Magnetocardiography in the Evaluation of Sudden Cardiac Death Risk: A Systematic Review

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1111/anec.70028
Thomas Lachlan, Hejie He, Kengo Kusano, Takeshi Aiba, Donatella Brisinda, Riccardo Fenici, Faizel Osman
{"title":"Magnetocardiography in the Evaluation of Sudden Cardiac Death Risk: A Systematic Review","authors":"Thomas Lachlan,&nbsp;Hejie He,&nbsp;Kengo Kusano,&nbsp;Takeshi Aiba,&nbsp;Donatella Brisinda,&nbsp;Riccardo Fenici,&nbsp;Faizel Osman","doi":"10.1111/anec.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is responsible for 15%–20% of deaths globally/year, predominantly due to ventricular arrhythmias (VA) caused by vulnerable cardiac substrate. Identifying those at risk has proved difficult with several limitations of current methods. We evaluated the evidence for magnetocardiography (MCG) in predicting SCD events. We searched Embase/Medline databases for English language papers evaluating MCG in patients at risk of VA. A total of 119 papers were screened with 27 papers included for analysis (23 case–controlled, four cohort studies); study sizes varied (<i>n</i> = 12 to 158). Etiology was ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) in 22, dilated cardiomyopathy in 2, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy in 1 and mixed in 2. In patients with ICM there were consistent discriminatory features seen using time-based and signal-complexity measures that persisted when evaluating the independence of these parameters. Current flow analysis demonstrated promising discriminatory results in other etiologies. The features studied support the role of MCG in identifying substrate for VA, particularly in ICM.</p>","PeriodicalId":8074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.70028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is responsible for 15%–20% of deaths globally/year, predominantly due to ventricular arrhythmias (VA) caused by vulnerable cardiac substrate. Identifying those at risk has proved difficult with several limitations of current methods. We evaluated the evidence for magnetocardiography (MCG) in predicting SCD events. We searched Embase/Medline databases for English language papers evaluating MCG in patients at risk of VA. A total of 119 papers were screened with 27 papers included for analysis (23 case–controlled, four cohort studies); study sizes varied (n = 12 to 158). Etiology was ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) in 22, dilated cardiomyopathy in 2, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy in 1 and mixed in 2. In patients with ICM there were consistent discriminatory features seen using time-based and signal-complexity measures that persisted when evaluating the independence of these parameters. Current flow analysis demonstrated promising discriminatory results in other etiologies. The features studied support the role of MCG in identifying substrate for VA, particularly in ICM.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振心动图在评估心脏性猝死风险中的应用:系统性综述》(Magnetocardiography in the Evaluation of Sudden Cardiac Death Risk: A Systematic Review)。
全球每年有 15%-20% 的人死于心脏性猝死 (SCD),主要原因是脆弱的心脏基质导致室性心律失常 (VA)。由于目前的方法存在一些局限性,因此很难识别高危人群。我们评估了磁心动图 (MCG) 预测 SCD 事件的证据。我们在 Embase/Medline 数据库中检索了对有 VA 风险的患者进行 MCG 评估的英文论文。共筛选出 119 篇论文,并纳入 27 篇论文进行分析(23 篇病例对照研究,4 篇队列研究);研究规模各不相同(n = 12 到 158)。在 ICM 患者中,使用基于时间和信号复杂性的测量方法可以发现一致的鉴别特征,在评估这些参数的独立性时,这些特征依然存在。当前的血流分析表明,对其他病因也有很好的鉴别效果。所研究的特征支持 MCG 在识别 VA 底物方面的作用,尤其是在 ICM 中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY (A.N.E) is an online only journal that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. ANE is the first journal in an evolving subspecialty that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. The publication includes topics related to 12-lead, exercise and high-resolution electrocardiography, arrhythmias, ischemia, repolarization phenomena, heart rate variability, circadian rhythms, bioengineering technology, signal-averaged ECGs, T-wave alternans and automatic external defibrillation. ANE publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of noninvasive electrocardiology. Original research, clinical studies, state-of-the-art reviews, case reports, technical notes, and letters to the editors will be published to meet future demands in this field.
期刊最新文献
Intracardiac Echocardiography and Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Dextrocardia Reassess Hospital Costs and Mortality Between Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation in a Modern Context Biotronik Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for Measurement of Intrathoracic Impedance: A Report of Two Cases Magnetocardiography in the Evaluation of Sudden Cardiac Death Risk: A Systematic Review Predicting Spontaneous Termination of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Analysis of Standard Electrocardiograms: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1