Effectiveness of an exercise therapy program based on sports in adults with acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of a sport-based exercise therapy program combined with usual care (sET+UC) compared with usual care alone (UC) on health-related quality of life, upper limb motor control, functional capacity, mobility, balance, and physical activity participation in ambulant adults with acquired brain injury (ABI).

Design: Single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Rehabilitation center.

Participants: Twenty-three adults with ABI (82.6% stroke; 17 males; mean age of 59.6±10.3 yr) INTERVENTION: Participants received either sET+UC (n=11) or UC (n=12). The sET+UC group received sixteen 60-minute sessions of a sport-based ET program in addition to sixteen 60-minute sessions of usual care, whereas the UC group attended usual care only.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were health-related quality of life (Short Form-36, SF-36) and upper limb motor control (Fugl Meyer-Upper Extremity; FM-UE), while the secondary included functional capacity (6-Minute Walk Test, 10-Meter Walk Test), mobility (Timed Up and Go Test), balance (Berg Balance Scale) and physical activity participation (Global Physical Activity Questionnaire).

Results: Significant differences were found in all outcome analyses at post-intervention when comparing between groups. The sET+UC group showed significant improvements in both the physical (p=.027, r=.46) and mental component summary (p=.001, r=.71) of the SF-36 as well as FM-UE (p=.004, r=.60), with large effect sizes. In turn, all secondary outcomes were also significantly improved in this group (all p<.05 r>.05). In contrast, the UC group showed slight improvements in post-intervention scores but did not reach significance in any of these measures.

Conclusions: This study shows that a sport-based exercise therapy program combined with usual care can effectively improve all the aforementioned outcomes measures in ABI population. Further research with larger sample sizes and follow-up assessments is crucial to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the long-term effects of the intervention in this specific population.