Costs and benefits of routine labs in hospital patients: iatrogenic anaemia and undiagnosed acute kidney injury.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002884
Dawson Dean
{"title":"Costs and benefits of routine labs in hospital patients: iatrogenic anaemia and undiagnosed acute kidney injury.","authors":"Dawson Dean","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Guidelines recommend avoiding unnecessary laboratory tests to minimise risks of anaemia in hospitalised patients as well as reduce costs, but there are costs to skipping routine labs including missing acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Quantify the costs and benefits of routine labs in dollar costs as well as mortality.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of 48 204 admissions at University of Kentucky Hospitals and simulates different strategies for skipping labs.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In a simplified estimate of pure dollar costs, the costs of daily labs appear to outweigh the costs of missing acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In both dollar costs and the number of patients with mortality effects, the benefits of randomly skipping labs appear to significantly outweigh the costs, but the costs are not insignificant.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Guidelines recommend avoiding unnecessary laboratory tests to minimise risks of anaemia in hospitalised patients as well as reduce costs, but there are costs to skipping routine labs including missing acute kidney injury.

Objective: Quantify the costs and benefits of routine labs in dollar costs as well as mortality.

Evidence review: This is a retrospective analysis of 48 204 admissions at University of Kentucky Hospitals and simulates different strategies for skipping labs.

Findings: In a simplified estimate of pure dollar costs, the costs of daily labs appear to outweigh the costs of missing acute kidney injury.

Conclusions and relevance: In both dollar costs and the number of patients with mortality effects, the benefits of randomly skipping labs appear to significantly outweigh the costs, but the costs are not insignificant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院患者常规化验的成本与收益:先天性贫血和未诊断的急性肾损伤。
重要性:指南建议避免不必要的实验室检查,以最大限度地降低住院患者贫血的风险并降低成本,但跳过常规实验室检查也是有成本的,包括错过急性肾损伤:量化常规化验的成本和收益(以美元计算)以及死亡率:这是一项对肯塔基大学医院 48 204 例住院病人的回顾性分析,模拟了不同的跳过实验室策略:研究结果:在对纯美元成本的简化估算中,每日化验的成本似乎超过了错过急性肾损伤的成本:无论从美元成本还是从影响死亡率的患者人数来看,随机跳过化验室的收益似乎都大大超过了成本,但成本也并非微不足道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementing group consultations in a lower limb musculoskeletal outpatient service to improve efficiency and maintain positive patient outcomes. Improving the primary care clinical testing process in southwest Scotland: a systems-based approach. Simulation with Monte Carlo methods to focus quality improvement efforts on interventions with the greatest potential for reducing PACU length of stay: a cross-sectional observational study. Aligning implementation research and clinical operations: a partnership to promote implementation research in primary care. Increasing resuscitation status-related goals of care discussions for older adults with severe mental illness in a Canadian mental health setting: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1