Physiotherapy in acute geriatrics wards: What (de)motivates patients? A qualitative study based on self-determination theory.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05474-4
Lucie Vancraeynest, Marie Vermeer, Marjorie Iacovelli, Caroline Naert, Zoé Coget, Etienne Toussaint, Didier Schoevaerdts
{"title":"Physiotherapy in acute geriatrics wards: What (de)motivates patients? A qualitative study based on self-determination theory.","authors":"Lucie Vancraeynest, Marie Vermeer, Marjorie Iacovelli, Caroline Naert, Zoé Coget, Etienne Toussaint, Didier Schoevaerdts","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05474-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the benefits of physiotherapy for hospitalized older patients (HOPs) are well established, these patients are often considered demotivated by healthcare team members (HTMs), which is perceived as a hindrance to their rehabilitation. The quantitative data currently available on the lack of involvement of HOPs are mainly measures of mobility. Motivation as such has, to our knowledge, never been measured. Therefore, this study aims to quantify for the first time the motivation levels of HOPs in their participation in activities of daily living (ADLs) and physiotherapy, and to explore the motivating factors behind their participation in physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The motivation of 60 older patients hospitalized in an acute geriatrics ward was quantified using the Scale of Demotivation Assessment (SDA). Out of these participants, 14 were interrogated through individual semi-structured face-to-face interviews. After transcription, data were analyzed according to Self-Determination Theory, which has been proven effective in the understanding of motivational mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of demotivation was 47% (95% CI: [0.34;0.6]) for ADLs and 35% (95% CI: [0.23;0.48]) for physiotherapy. The main demotivating factors were the feeling of external control (lack of autonomy) and dependance experienced by HOPs, as well as the limited availability of staff during hospitalization. Conversely, feelings of competence, security, respect for limits, and commitment from the HTMs were important motivating factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A large number of relational factors have an impact on the motivation of HOPs regarding their participation in ADLs and in physiotherapy sessions. Appropriate time and space organizing and the provision of suitable equipment, combined with a genuine caring and respectful attitude from the HTMs, could considerably encourage the expression of intrinsic motivation and thus the involvement of HOPs in their own care program.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05474-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While the benefits of physiotherapy for hospitalized older patients (HOPs) are well established, these patients are often considered demotivated by healthcare team members (HTMs), which is perceived as a hindrance to their rehabilitation. The quantitative data currently available on the lack of involvement of HOPs are mainly measures of mobility. Motivation as such has, to our knowledge, never been measured. Therefore, this study aims to quantify for the first time the motivation levels of HOPs in their participation in activities of daily living (ADLs) and physiotherapy, and to explore the motivating factors behind their participation in physiotherapy.

Methods: The motivation of 60 older patients hospitalized in an acute geriatrics ward was quantified using the Scale of Demotivation Assessment (SDA). Out of these participants, 14 were interrogated through individual semi-structured face-to-face interviews. After transcription, data were analyzed according to Self-Determination Theory, which has been proven effective in the understanding of motivational mechanisms.

Results: The prevalence of demotivation was 47% (95% CI: [0.34;0.6]) for ADLs and 35% (95% CI: [0.23;0.48]) for physiotherapy. The main demotivating factors were the feeling of external control (lack of autonomy) and dependance experienced by HOPs, as well as the limited availability of staff during hospitalization. Conversely, feelings of competence, security, respect for limits, and commitment from the HTMs were important motivating factors.

Conclusion: A large number of relational factors have an impact on the motivation of HOPs regarding their participation in ADLs and in physiotherapy sessions. Appropriate time and space organizing and the provision of suitable equipment, combined with a genuine caring and respectful attitude from the HTMs, could considerably encourage the expression of intrinsic motivation and thus the involvement of HOPs in their own care program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性老年病房的物理治疗:是什么(消除)了患者的动机?基于自我决定理论的定性研究。
背景:虽然物理治疗对住院老年患者(HOPs)的益处已得到公认,但医护团队成员(HTMs)往往认为这些患者缺乏积极性,这被视为他们康复的障碍。目前,有关老年病人参与不足的量化数据主要是对行动能力的衡量。据我们所知,从未对动机进行过测量。因此,本研究旨在首次量化居家养老患者参与日常生活活动(ADLs)和物理治疗的动机水平,并探讨他们参与物理治疗背后的动机因素:方法:使用 "去动机评估量表"(SDA)对在老年病急症病房住院的 60 名老年患者的动机进行量化。在这些参与者中,有 14 人接受了半结构化面对面访谈。转录后,根据自我决定理论对数据进行了分析:ADL和物理治疗的动机消退率分别为47%(95% CI:[0.34;0.6])和35%(95% CI:[0.23;0.48])。主要的挫伤积极性因素是居家护理人员的外部控制感(缺乏自主性)和依赖感,以及住院期间工作人员的有限可用性。相反,能力感、安全感、对限制的尊重以及来自高危产妇的承诺则是重要的激励因素:结论:许多关系因素都会影响居家护理人员参与日常活动和物理治疗的积极性。安排适当的时间和空间、提供合适的设备,再加上物理治疗师真诚的关怀和尊重态度,都能极大地鼓励居家养老服务人员表达内在动机,从而使他们参与到自己的护理计划中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with the occupational balance in caregivers of people with dementia: A cross-sectional study from the ATENEA project. Mazor X robot-assisted upper and lower cervical pedicle screw fixation: a case report and literature review. Sociodemographic and health disparities in self-care difficulties among older individuals: Evidence from South Africa. Association of cognitive performance with overall, dosage, intensity, and domain physical activity in aging: NHANES 2011-2014. Validity and reliability of the TechPH scale in assessing Iranian older adults' attitudes toward technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1