Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications according to STOPP-Frail criteria in nursing home residents, the SHELTER study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05450-y
Alireza Malek Makan, Hein van Hout, Graziano Onder, Harriet Finne-Soveri, Daniela Fialova, Rob van Marum
{"title":"Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications according to STOPP-Frail criteria in nursing home residents, the SHELTER study.","authors":"Alireza Malek Makan, Hein van Hout, Graziano Onder, Harriet Finne-Soveri, Daniela Fialova, Rob van Marum","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05450-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in nursing home residents across eight countries and investigate differences between residents with and without cognitive impairment, as well as those with and without life expectancy of six months or less.</p><p><strong>Methods and deign: </strong>The study utilized the second edition of the STOPP-Frail criteria to operationalize PIMs in the baseline assessment of nursing home residents participating in the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) project. The data were collected between 2009 and 2012. The project was conducted in eight countries: Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Israel. Cognitive impairment was measured by the cognitive performance scale (CPS). The presence of end-stage disease with a life expectancy of six months or less was recorded. The study included residents aged 60 years or older who underwent a valid medication assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 3,832 eligible residents, 87.9% had at least one PIM. Specifically, 24.3%, 23.5%, 18.8%, and 19.3% of residents had one, two, three, and four or more PIMs, respectively. On average, each person was prescribed 2.16 PIMs. Cognitively impaired residents (n = 1999) had an average of 1.96 PIMs (SD 1.49) per person, while residents with a low CPS score (n = 1783) had an average of 2.40 PIMs (SD 1.57) per person, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). Similarly, NH residents with life expectancy of six months or less had an average of 1.66 PIMs (SD 1.30), whereas those without had an average of 2.17 PIMs (SD 1.55) (p < 0.001). The average number of PIMs varied across countries, ranging from 3.23 in Finland to 2.15 in the UK (P < 0.001). Anti-platelets and aspirin were the most prescribed PIMs, accounting for over 38.0% of prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the high prevalence of PIMs among nursing home residents. However, PIMs were somewhat lower in residents with cognitive impairment and life expectancy of six months or less. Efforts must continue to improve the rationale behind prescribing practices in nursing homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05450-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in nursing home residents across eight countries and investigate differences between residents with and without cognitive impairment, as well as those with and without life expectancy of six months or less.

Methods and deign: The study utilized the second edition of the STOPP-Frail criteria to operationalize PIMs in the baseline assessment of nursing home residents participating in the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) project. The data were collected between 2009 and 2012. The project was conducted in eight countries: Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Israel. Cognitive impairment was measured by the cognitive performance scale (CPS). The presence of end-stage disease with a life expectancy of six months or less was recorded. The study included residents aged 60 years or older who underwent a valid medication assessment.

Results: Among the 3,832 eligible residents, 87.9% had at least one PIM. Specifically, 24.3%, 23.5%, 18.8%, and 19.3% of residents had one, two, three, and four or more PIMs, respectively. On average, each person was prescribed 2.16 PIMs. Cognitively impaired residents (n = 1999) had an average of 1.96 PIMs (SD 1.49) per person, while residents with a low CPS score (n = 1783) had an average of 2.40 PIMs (SD 1.57) per person, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). Similarly, NH residents with life expectancy of six months or less had an average of 1.66 PIMs (SD 1.30), whereas those without had an average of 2.17 PIMs (SD 1.55) (p < 0.001). The average number of PIMs varied across countries, ranging from 3.23 in Finland to 2.15 in the UK (P < 0.001). Anti-platelets and aspirin were the most prescribed PIMs, accounting for over 38.0% of prescriptions.

Conclusions: This study highlights the high prevalence of PIMs among nursing home residents. However, PIMs were somewhat lower in residents with cognitive impairment and life expectancy of six months or less. Efforts must continue to improve the rationale behind prescribing practices in nursing homes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据 STOPP-Frail 标准确定的养老院居民潜在用药不当情况,SHELTER 研究。
研究目的本研究旨在确定八个国家的疗养院居民潜在用药不当(PIMs)的发生率,并调查有认知障碍和无认知障碍以及预期寿命为六个月或更短的疗养院居民之间的差异。方法与设计:本研究采用第二版 STOPP-Frail 标准对参与 "长期护理中的老年人服务与健康(SHELTER)"项目的疗养院居民进行基线评估,以确定潜在用药不当的发生率。数据收集时间为 2009 年至 2012 年。该项目在八个国家开展:这八个国家分别是捷克共和国、英格兰、芬兰、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰和以色列。认知障碍通过认知表现量表(CPS)进行测量。此外,还记录了是否患有预期寿命为 6 个月或更短时间的终末期疾病。研究对象包括年龄在 60 岁或以上、接受过有效药物评估的居民:在 3,832 名符合条件的居民中,87.9% 的人至少有一次 PIM。具体来说,分别有 24.3%、23.5%、18.8% 和 19.3% 的居民拥有一种、两种、三种和四种或更多的 PIM。平均每人被处方 2.16 种 PIM。认知功能受损的住户(n = 1999)平均每人被处方 1.96 个 PIMs(标准差为 1.49),而 CPS 分数较低的住户(n = 1783)平均每人被处方 2.40 个 PIMs(标准差为 1.57),两者之间存在显著的统计学差异(P 结论:认知功能受损的住户平均每人被处方 1.96 个 PIMs(标准差为 1.49):本研究强调了养老院居民中 PIM 的高发生率。然而,在有认知障碍且预期寿命为 6 个月或更短的住院者中,PIM 的发生率略低。必须继续努力改善疗养院处方做法的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Impact of dementia on post-hip fracture walking ability: a stratified analysis based on pre-fracture mobility in Swedish cohorts of older adults. Quality of life and associated characteristics in long-term care residents with advanced dementia in Macao: a cross-sectional study. Home physical therapy versus telerehabilitation in improving motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Psychotropic use for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in US adults: a nationwide cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1