LLpowershap: logistic loss-based automated Shapley values feature selection method.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Medical Research Methodology Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02370-8
Iqbal Madakkatel, Elina Hyppönen
{"title":"LLpowershap: logistic loss-based automated Shapley values feature selection method.","authors":"Iqbal Madakkatel, Elina Hyppönen","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02370-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shapley values have been used extensively in machine learning, not only to explain black box machine learning models, but among other tasks, also to conduct model debugging, sensitivity and fairness analyses and to select important features for robust modelling and for further follow-up analyses. Shapley values satisfy certain axioms that promote fairness in distributing contributions of features toward prediction or reducing error, after accounting for non-linear relationships and interactions when complex machine learning models are employed. Recently, feature selection methods using predictive Shapley values and p-values have been introduced, including powershap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a novel feature selection method, LLpowershap, that takes forward these recent advances by employing loss-based Shapley values to identify informative features with minimal noise among the selected sets of features. We also enhance the calculation of p-values and power to identify informative features and to estimate number of iterations of model development and testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our simulation results show that LLpowershap not only identifies higher number of informative features but outputs fewer noise features compared to other state-of-the-art feature selection methods. Benchmarking results on four real-world datasets demonstrate higher or comparable predictive performance of LLpowershap compared to other Shapley based wrapper methods, or filter methods. LLpowershap is also ranked the best in mean ranking among the seven feature selection methods tested on the benchmark datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate that LLpowershap is a viable wrapper feature selection method that can be used for feature selection in large biomedical datasets and other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02370-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shapley values have been used extensively in machine learning, not only to explain black box machine learning models, but among other tasks, also to conduct model debugging, sensitivity and fairness analyses and to select important features for robust modelling and for further follow-up analyses. Shapley values satisfy certain axioms that promote fairness in distributing contributions of features toward prediction or reducing error, after accounting for non-linear relationships and interactions when complex machine learning models are employed. Recently, feature selection methods using predictive Shapley values and p-values have been introduced, including powershap.

Methods: We present a novel feature selection method, LLpowershap, that takes forward these recent advances by employing loss-based Shapley values to identify informative features with minimal noise among the selected sets of features. We also enhance the calculation of p-values and power to identify informative features and to estimate number of iterations of model development and testing.

Results: Our simulation results show that LLpowershap not only identifies higher number of informative features but outputs fewer noise features compared to other state-of-the-art feature selection methods. Benchmarking results on four real-world datasets demonstrate higher or comparable predictive performance of LLpowershap compared to other Shapley based wrapper methods, or filter methods. LLpowershap is also ranked the best in mean ranking among the seven feature selection methods tested on the benchmark datasets.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that LLpowershap is a viable wrapper feature selection method that can be used for feature selection in large biomedical datasets and other settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LLpowershap:基于逻辑损失的自动夏普利值特征选择方法。
背景:夏普利值在机器学习中得到了广泛应用,它不仅用于解释黑盒机器学习模型,还用于进行模型调试、灵敏度和公平性分析,以及为稳健建模和进一步的后续分析选择重要特征。Shapley 值满足某些公理,在使用复杂机器学习模型时,在考虑非线性关系和相互作用后,这些公理可促进公平分配特征对预测或减少误差的贡献。最近,人们推出了使用预测夏普利值和 p 值的特征选择方法,包括 powerhap.Methods:我们提出了一种新颖的特征选择方法 LLpowershap,它采用基于损失的 Shapley 值来识别信息特征,并将所选特征集中的噪声降至最低,从而推动了这些最新进展。我们还加强了 p 值和功率的计算,以确定信息特征,并估算模型开发和测试的迭代次数:我们的模拟结果表明,与其他最先进的特征选择方法相比,LLpowershap 不仅能识别出更多的信息特征,还能输出更少的噪声特征。在四个实际数据集上的基准测试结果表明,与其他基于 Shapley 的包装方法或过滤方法相比,LLpowershap 的预测性能更高,甚至不相上下。在基准数据集上测试的七种特征选择方法中,LLpowershap 的平均排名也是最好的:我们的研究结果表明,LLpowershap 是一种可行的包装特征选择方法,可用于大型生物医学数据集和其他环境中的特征选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
期刊最新文献
The role of the estimand framework in the analysis of patient-reported outcomes in single-arm trials: a case study in oncology. Cardinality matching versus propensity score matching for addressing cluster-level residual confounding in implantable medical device and surgical epidemiology: a parametric and plasmode simulation study. Establishing a machine learning dementia progression prediction model with multiple integrated data. Correction: Forced randomization: the what, why, and how. Three new methodologies for calculating the effective sample size when performing population adjustment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1