Social, cultural and political conditions for advancing health equity: examples from eight country case studies (2011-2021).

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015694
Miriam van den Berg, Joanne Flavel, Ashley Schram, Sharon Friel, Hailay Abrha Gesesew, Fran Baum
{"title":"Social, cultural and political conditions for advancing health equity: examples from eight country case studies (2011-2021).","authors":"Miriam van den Berg, Joanne Flavel, Ashley Schram, Sharon Friel, Hailay Abrha Gesesew, Fran Baum","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Progress in addressing systematic health inequities, both between and within countries, has been slow. However, there are examples of actions taken on social determinants of health and policy changes aimed at shaping the underlying sociopolitical context that drives these inequities.Using case study methodology, this article identifies five countries (Ethiopia, Jordan, Spain, Sri Lanka and Vietnam) that made progress on health equity during 2011-2021 and three countries (Afghanistan, Nigeria and the USA) that had not made the same gains. The case studies revealed social, cultural and political conditions that appeared to be prerequisites for enhancing health equity.Data related to population health outcomes, human development, poverty, universal healthcare, gender equity, sociocultural narratives, political stability and leadership, governance, peace, democracy, willingness to collaborate, social protection and the Sustainable Development Goals were interrogated revealing four key factors that help advance health equity. These were (1) action directed at structural determinants of health inequities, for example, sociopolitical conditions that determine the distribution of resources and opportunities based on gender, race, ethnicity and geographical location; (2) leadership and good governance, for example, the degree of freedom, and the absence of violence and terrorism; (3) a health equity lens for policy development, for example, facilitating the uptake of a health equity agenda through cross-sector policies and (4) taking action to level the social gradient in health through a combination of universal and targeted approaches.Reducing health inequities is a complex and challenging task. The countries in this study do not reveal guaranteed recipes for progressing health equity; however, the efforts should be recognised, as well as lessons learnt from countries struggling to make progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 Suppl 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015694","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Progress in addressing systematic health inequities, both between and within countries, has been slow. However, there are examples of actions taken on social determinants of health and policy changes aimed at shaping the underlying sociopolitical context that drives these inequities.Using case study methodology, this article identifies five countries (Ethiopia, Jordan, Spain, Sri Lanka and Vietnam) that made progress on health equity during 2011-2021 and three countries (Afghanistan, Nigeria and the USA) that had not made the same gains. The case studies revealed social, cultural and political conditions that appeared to be prerequisites for enhancing health equity.Data related to population health outcomes, human development, poverty, universal healthcare, gender equity, sociocultural narratives, political stability and leadership, governance, peace, democracy, willingness to collaborate, social protection and the Sustainable Development Goals were interrogated revealing four key factors that help advance health equity. These were (1) action directed at structural determinants of health inequities, for example, sociopolitical conditions that determine the distribution of resources and opportunities based on gender, race, ethnicity and geographical location; (2) leadership and good governance, for example, the degree of freedom, and the absence of violence and terrorism; (3) a health equity lens for policy development, for example, facilitating the uptake of a health equity agenda through cross-sector policies and (4) taking action to level the social gradient in health through a combination of universal and targeted approaches.Reducing health inequities is a complex and challenging task. The countries in this study do not reveal guaranteed recipes for progressing health equity; however, the efforts should be recognised, as well as lessons learnt from countries struggling to make progress.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进卫生公平的社会、文化和政治条件:八个国家案例研究的实例(2011-2021 年)。
在解决国家之间和国家内部的系统性卫生不平等方面,进展缓慢。本文采用案例研究方法,确定了 2011-2021 年期间在卫生公平方面取得进展的五个国家(埃塞俄比亚、约旦、西班牙、斯里兰卡和越南)和未取得同样进展的三个国家(阿富汗、尼日利亚和美国)。案例研究显示,社会、文化和政治条件似乎是加强卫生公平的先决条件。与人口健康结果、人类发展、贫困、全民医疗保健、性别公平、社会文化叙事、政治稳定和领导力、治理、和平、民主、合作意愿、社会保护和可持续发展目标有关的数据得到了分析,揭示了有助于促进卫生公平的四个关键因素。这四个因素是:(1) 针对健康不公平的结构性决定因素采取行动,例如,根据性别、种族、族裔和地理位置决定资源和机会分配的社会政治条件;(2) 领导力和善治,例如,自由度以及没有暴力和恐怖主义;(3) 从健康公平的角度制定政策,例如,通过跨部门政策促进采纳健康公平议程;(4) 采取行动,通过普遍方法和有针对性的方法相结合,拉平健康方面的社会梯度。减少卫生不公平现象是一项复杂而具有挑战性的任务。本研究中的国家并没有揭示出促进卫生公平的可靠方法;但是,我们应该承认这些努力,并从努力取得进展的国家中吸取经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Caught between violence: Mpox virus and the perils of neglect in Africa. Health impact and cost-effectiveness of vaccination using potential next-generation influenza vaccines in Thailand: a modelling study. Probing the past: historical case study analysis to inform more just and sustainable global health partnerships in education. Seven core competencies and conditions for equitable partnerships and power sharing in community-based participatory research. Private sector tuberculosis care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional standardised patients study of adherence to national TB guidelines in urban Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1