Current Practice, Safety and Efficacy of Interventions for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Evidence From a UK Registry.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Clinical Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1111/coa.14245
Adam J Donne, Kim Keltie, Julie Burn, Emma Belilios, Steven Powell, Paola Cognigni, Iain J Nixon, Neil Bateman, Haytham Kubba, Owen Judd, Andrew Sims
{"title":"Current Practice, Safety and Efficacy of Interventions for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Evidence From a UK Registry.","authors":"Adam J Donne, Kim Keltie, Julie Burn, Emma Belilios, Steven Powell, Paola Cognigni, Iain J Nixon, Neil Bateman, Haytham Kubba, Owen Judd, Andrew Sims","doi":"10.1111/coa.14245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the current practice, safety and efficacy of interventions used in the management of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) in the UK NHS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective registry (recruitment between 1st April 2018 and 31st August 2022, retrospective data from 1st January 2015 permitted with consent). Sub-group data-linked to Hospital Episode Statistics for additional follow-up (until 31st July 2022).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>UK NHS hospitals treating RRP patients.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children and adults diagnosed with RRP and managed in an NHS hospital.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Disease severity (Derkay, voice handicap and GRBAS scores), management (type and frequency of surgical and adjuvant intervention) and complications (cancer, death).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and thirty patients were entered into the registry; 304 (including 65 children) were eligible for analysis. Children had more severe disease than adults (median Derkay score 10 vs. 5). Microdebrider was the most common surgical intervention, particularly in children (86% of children, 49% of adults). Additionally, lasers (CO<sub>2</sub>, KTP and pulsed dye) were used in 34% of adults. Gardasil was the most common adjuvant therapy (21 children, 23 adults). Procedural complications were rare (10.8% children, 5.9% adults). Five patients developed laryngeal malignancy; there were six deaths during follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the largest UK RRP study to date. RRP is more aggressive in children than adults, and treatment choice differs between age groups. Overall, management was safe with minimal complications reported, and generally effective in maintaining a safe airway. Standardised reporting is required to objectively monitor disease progression and safety over time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT03465280, ISRCTN36100560.</p>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.14245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the current practice, safety and efficacy of interventions used in the management of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) in the UK NHS.

Design: Prospective registry (recruitment between 1st April 2018 and 31st August 2022, retrospective data from 1st January 2015 permitted with consent). Sub-group data-linked to Hospital Episode Statistics for additional follow-up (until 31st July 2022).

Setting: UK NHS hospitals treating RRP patients.

Participants: Children and adults diagnosed with RRP and managed in an NHS hospital.

Main outcome measures: Disease severity (Derkay, voice handicap and GRBAS scores), management (type and frequency of surgical and adjuvant intervention) and complications (cancer, death).

Results: Three hundred and thirty patients were entered into the registry; 304 (including 65 children) were eligible for analysis. Children had more severe disease than adults (median Derkay score 10 vs. 5). Microdebrider was the most common surgical intervention, particularly in children (86% of children, 49% of adults). Additionally, lasers (CO2, KTP and pulsed dye) were used in 34% of adults. Gardasil was the most common adjuvant therapy (21 children, 23 adults). Procedural complications were rare (10.8% children, 5.9% adults). Five patients developed laryngeal malignancy; there were six deaths during follow-up period.

Conclusions: This is the largest UK RRP study to date. RRP is more aggressive in children than adults, and treatment choice differs between age groups. Overall, management was safe with minimal complications reported, and generally effective in maintaining a safe airway. Standardised reporting is required to objectively monitor disease progression and safety over time.

Trial registration: NCT03465280, ISRCTN36100560.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性呼吸道乳头状瘤病干预措施的现行做法、安全性和有效性:来自英国登记处的证据。
目的确定英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)目前用于治疗复发性呼吸道乳头状瘤病(RRP)的干预措施、安全性和有效性:前瞻性登记(2018 年 4 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日期间进行招募,经同意可从 2015 年 1 月 1 日起提供回顾性数据)。分组数据与医院病例统计(Hospital Episode Statistics)挂钩,以进行额外随访(至 2022 年 7 月 31 日):治疗 RRP 患者的英国国家医疗服务系统医院:主要结果指标:疾病严重程度(Derkay、嗓音障碍和 GRBAS 评分)、管理(手术和辅助干预的类型和频率)和并发症(癌症、死亡):登记在册的患者有 330 人,其中 304 人(包括 65 名儿童)符合分析条件。与成人相比,儿童的病情更为严重(Derkay评分中位数为10分,成人为5分)。显微脱毛器是最常见的手术治疗方法,尤其是在儿童中(86% 的儿童和 49% 的成人)。此外,34%的成人使用过激光(CO2、KTP 和脉冲染料)。加德西(Gardasil)是最常见的辅助疗法(21 名儿童,23 名成人)。手术并发症很少见(儿童为 10.8%,成人为 5.9%)。五名患者出现喉恶性肿瘤;六名患者在随访期间死亡:这是迄今为止英国规模最大的 RRP 研究。结论:这是英国迄今为止最大规模的RRP研究。儿童RRP比成人更具侵袭性,不同年龄组的治疗选择也不尽相同。总体而言,治疗是安全的,报告的并发症极少,而且在维持气道安全方面普遍有效。需要进行标准化的报告,以客观监测疾病的进展和长期安全性:试验注册:NCT03465280、ISRCTN36100560。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Otolaryngology
Clinical Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with: current otorhinolaryngological practice audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL head and neck oncology head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery continuing medical education and ORL training The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research. Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject. • Negative/null results In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.
期刊最新文献
Risk Stratification of Suspected Head and Neck Cancer Referral Letters: A Prospective Cohort Study. The Effect of Using Perioperative Platelet-Rich Plasma on Wound Healing Rate and Prevention of Salivary Fistula Formation in Patients Undergoing Partial Parotidectomy. 'How Long Do I Have?' - Examining survival outcomes in laryngeal cancer patients managed with non-curative intent in Northern UK: Insights from the Northern Head & Neck Cancer Alliance Retrospective Study. Issue Information Epidemiology of Cholesteatoma in the UK Biobank.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1