Rosanne Thornhill, David Blitzer, Seth T. Lirette, Kristen T. Carter, Asim Mohammed, David A. Baran, Hannah Copeland
{"title":"Impact of Center Volume on the Use of Status 2 Exceptions for Heart Transplantation","authors":"Rosanne Thornhill, David Blitzer, Seth T. Lirette, Kristen T. Carter, Asim Mohammed, David A. Baran, Hannah Copeland","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>There are limited data examining the relationship between transplant center volume and their use of Status 2 exceptions for heart transplant (OHT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database identified all patients undergoing OHT under Status 2 exception between late 2018 and early 2023. Demographics were collected and transplant centers were categorized based on the number of OHT performed annually (very low volume = < 5 OHT per year; low volume = 5–24 OHT per year; medium volume = 25–50 OHT per year, high volume = > 50 OHT per year).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across all centers, 6348 OHT were included, with <i>n</i> = 68 performed at very low volume centers, <i>n</i> = 1001 performed at low volume centers, <i>n</i> = 1834 performed at medium volume centers, and <i>n</i> = 3445 performed at high volume centers. Medium and high volume centers applied for at least one Status 2 exception about 30%–35% of the time, compared to 50%–60% of the time observed at very low and low volume centers. Compared to very low volume centers, medium volume centers applied for half the amount of Status 2 exceptions (IRR = 0.52 [0.35–0.76]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) while high volume centers applied for less than half the amount (IRR = 0.42 [0.29–0.62]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). High-volume centers were also 18% less likely to apply for exceptions than medium-volume centers (IRR = 0.82 [0.74–0.91]; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Lower volume transplant centers apply for Status 2 exceptions at a significantly higher rate, with a stepwise decrease in exception use with increasing transplant center volume.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
There are limited data examining the relationship between transplant center volume and their use of Status 2 exceptions for heart transplant (OHT).
Methods
A retrospective review of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database identified all patients undergoing OHT under Status 2 exception between late 2018 and early 2023. Demographics were collected and transplant centers were categorized based on the number of OHT performed annually (very low volume = < 5 OHT per year; low volume = 5–24 OHT per year; medium volume = 25–50 OHT per year, high volume = > 50 OHT per year).
Results
Across all centers, 6348 OHT were included, with n = 68 performed at very low volume centers, n = 1001 performed at low volume centers, n = 1834 performed at medium volume centers, and n = 3445 performed at high volume centers. Medium and high volume centers applied for at least one Status 2 exception about 30%–35% of the time, compared to 50%–60% of the time observed at very low and low volume centers. Compared to very low volume centers, medium volume centers applied for half the amount of Status 2 exceptions (IRR = 0.52 [0.35–0.76]; p < 0.001) while high volume centers applied for less than half the amount (IRR = 0.42 [0.29–0.62]; p < 0.001). High-volume centers were also 18% less likely to apply for exceptions than medium-volume centers (IRR = 0.82 [0.74–0.91]; p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Lower volume transplant centers apply for Status 2 exceptions at a significantly higher rate, with a stepwise decrease in exception use with increasing transplant center volume.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.