Radiation dose to health care workers measured by thermoluminescent dosimetry.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.018
M Alakhras, D S Al-Mousa, B Al Mohammad, I Kleib
{"title":"Radiation dose to health care workers measured by thermoluminescent dosimetry.","authors":"M Alakhras, D S Al-Mousa, B Al Mohammad, I Kleib","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate radiation dose among physicians, nurses, nuclear medicine (NM) technicians, and radiographers at a single institution and to compare the difference in the measured dose during COVID-19 with other periods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the occupational radiation doses received by all workers in diagnostic radiography and NM departments at a single institution during a 5-year period (2018-2022) was performed. Dose measurements were recorded for 94 radiology personnel: radiographers, NM technicians, physicians, and nurses. In addition to descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the average annual effective dose between male and female workers and between the periods before and during COVID-19. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare effective radiation doses from different quadrants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The annual average effective doses were found to be between 0.58 and 0.72 mSv for males and 0.68 and 0.85 mSv for females. All radiographers, 86% of nurses, and 69% of physicians have received annual average effective doses below 0.99 mSv. The average annual effective doses for all radiation workers were similar in the period before COVID-19 when compared to the period during COVID-19 except for nurses who had significantly lower (P<0.05) doses before COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The average annual effective doses of radiation workers during 2018-2022 were well below the annual dose limit. A relatively higher average effective dose was received among NM technicians compared with other radiation occupational workers. While the caseload during the COVID-19 pandemic was lower due to government policies, the radiation dose to healthcare workers during the pandemic was similar to that before the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate radiation dose among physicians, nurses, nuclear medicine (NM) technicians, and radiographers at a single institution and to compare the difference in the measured dose during COVID-19 with other periods.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of the occupational radiation doses received by all workers in diagnostic radiography and NM departments at a single institution during a 5-year period (2018-2022) was performed. Dose measurements were recorded for 94 radiology personnel: radiographers, NM technicians, physicians, and nurses. In addition to descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the average annual effective dose between male and female workers and between the periods before and during COVID-19. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare effective radiation doses from different quadrants.

Results: The annual average effective doses were found to be between 0.58 and 0.72 mSv for males and 0.68 and 0.85 mSv for females. All radiographers, 86% of nurses, and 69% of physicians have received annual average effective doses below 0.99 mSv. The average annual effective doses for all radiation workers were similar in the period before COVID-19 when compared to the period during COVID-19 except for nurses who had significantly lower (P<0.05) doses before COVID-19.

Conclusion: The average annual effective doses of radiation workers during 2018-2022 were well below the annual dose limit. A relatively higher average effective dose was received among NM technicians compared with other radiation occupational workers. While the caseload during the COVID-19 pandemic was lower due to government policies, the radiation dose to healthcare workers during the pandemic was similar to that before the pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过热释光剂量计测量医护人员的辐射剂量。
目的:评估一家机构的医生、护士、核医学(NM)技师和放射技师的辐射剂量,并比较 COVID-19 期间与其他时期测量剂量的差异:对一家机构的放射诊断和核医学部门的所有工作人员在 5 年期间(2018-2022 年)接受的职业辐射剂量进行了回顾性分析。记录了 94 名放射科人员的剂量测量结果:放射技师、NM 技术员、医生和护士。除描述性统计外,还使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验来比较男性和女性工作人员之间以及 COVID-19 之前和期间之间的年平均有效剂量。Kruskal-Wallis 检验用于比较不同象限的有效辐射剂量:结果发现,男性的年平均有效剂量在 0.58 至 0.72 mSv 之间,女性在 0.68 至 0.85 mSv 之间。所有放射技师、86% 的护士和 69% 的医生的年平均有效剂量低于 0.99 毫西弗。与 COVID-19 期间相比,COVID-19 之前所有辐射工作者的年均有效剂量相似,但护士的年均有效剂量明显较低:2018-2022 年期间,辐射工作人员的年平均有效剂量远低于年剂量限值。与其他辐射职业工作者相比,核医学技术人员的平均有效剂量相对较高。虽然COVID-19大流行期间的病例量因政府政策而减少,但大流行期间医护人员的辐射剂量与大流行前相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Contents RCR meetings Classifying, recognizing, and troubleshooting errors in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided breast biopsies. Radiation dose to health care workers measured by thermoluminescent dosimetry. Dual-energy subtraction radiography (DESR): a systematic review and meta-analysis of pulmonary nodule detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1