{"title":"Optimized Calcium Hydroxylapatite Formulation and Its Injection Technique for Hand Rejuvenation: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Emanuele Bartoletti, Alison Favaroni, Loredana Cavalieri","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1404a283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hand rejuvenation treatment is in high demand in cosmetic medicine. Radiesse®, a commercially available formulation of calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA), is safe, biocompatible, and provides long-lasting results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the presented formulation of Radiesse® and its injection procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The hands of 58 women were treated employing Radiesse® diluted with lidocaine. The treatment was performed using a blunt cannula following the proximal-to-distal fanning technique at two entry points on the dorsum of the hands. The patients received 1-4 treatments over a follow-up period of up to five years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hands of 58 females were evaluated using the Merz Hand Grading Scale (MHGS) and treated with the presented CaHA formulation. After the first treatment, 55 patients (94.8%) achieved a 1-point improvement, and 19 patients (32.8%) did not receive further treatment, being satisfied with the results. The remaining 39 women (67.2%) received 2-4 follow-up treatments. At the end of the treatment(s), 46 women (79%) achieved a final improvement of one point, and 12 women (21%) a final improvement of two points. Three minor adverse events were registered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiesse® diluted with lidocaine is an excellent choice for hand rejuvenation. The formulation and technique proved to be safe and efficient. In our experience, a blunt cannula should be employed for optimal vein correction. The treatment was highly satisfying, although planning a second treatment during the 1-month follow-up visit is recommended to best achieve long-lasting results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1404a283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Hand rejuvenation treatment is in high demand in cosmetic medicine. Radiesse®, a commercially available formulation of calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA), is safe, biocompatible, and provides long-lasting results.
Objective: The study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the presented formulation of Radiesse® and its injection procedure.
Methods: The hands of 58 women were treated employing Radiesse® diluted with lidocaine. The treatment was performed using a blunt cannula following the proximal-to-distal fanning technique at two entry points on the dorsum of the hands. The patients received 1-4 treatments over a follow-up period of up to five years.
Results: The hands of 58 females were evaluated using the Merz Hand Grading Scale (MHGS) and treated with the presented CaHA formulation. After the first treatment, 55 patients (94.8%) achieved a 1-point improvement, and 19 patients (32.8%) did not receive further treatment, being satisfied with the results. The remaining 39 women (67.2%) received 2-4 follow-up treatments. At the end of the treatment(s), 46 women (79%) achieved a final improvement of one point, and 12 women (21%) a final improvement of two points. Three minor adverse events were registered.
Conclusions: Radiesse® diluted with lidocaine is an excellent choice for hand rejuvenation. The formulation and technique proved to be safe and efficient. In our experience, a blunt cannula should be employed for optimal vein correction. The treatment was highly satisfying, although planning a second treatment during the 1-month follow-up visit is recommended to best achieve long-lasting results.