Quantitative ROI differences for assessment of occult intertrochanteric extension of greater trochanteric fractures on pelvis CT.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Emergency Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s10140-024-02293-3
Meghan A Moriarty, Dimitri G Stefanov, Michael S Brown, Daniel M Walz, Pamela J Walsh
{"title":"Quantitative ROI differences for assessment of occult intertrochanteric extension of greater trochanteric fractures on pelvis CT.","authors":"Meghan A Moriarty, Dimitri G Stefanov, Michael S Brown, Daniel M Walz, Pamela J Walsh","doi":"10.1007/s10140-024-02293-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if difference in Hounsfield Units (HU) of the medullary bone between the injured and non-injured femurs in patients with greater trochanteric fractures is associated with occult intertrochanteric (IT) extension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review was performed of 81 patients (age range 54-102, 54 females and 27 males) who underwent CT and subsequent MRI after identification of a greater trochanteric fracture without evidence of IT extension on radiography and/or CT. Hounsfield units of the injured and non-injured femurs on CT were recorded at the level of the base of the greater trochanter centrally (ROI1) and the level of the upper border of the lesser trochanter posteromedially (ROI2). The difference between the injured and non-injured femur for each ROI1 and ROI2 were calculated. Absence or presence, and if present, extent of IT extension was assessed on MRI. Analysis was performed to determine if there is correlation of difference in density with presence, and extent of occult IT fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>81 cases met inclusion criteria, 14 (17%) had no IT extension, 11 (14%) had less than 50% IT extension and 56 (69%) had 50% or greater IT extension. There was statistical significance between presence and absence of IT extension between the injured and non-injured femur for ROI1 (HU) no IT extension median (IQR): 18.8(4-40), ROI1 (HU) present IT extension median (IQR): 65.5(46-90) p < .0001, and for ROI2 no IT extension median (IQR): 3(-8-25.5) and ROI2 present IT extension 51(40.5-76), p < .0001. There was statistical significance of the extent of IT extension: ROI1 less than 50% IT extension median (IQR): 37.5(27.5-57), ROI1 50% or greater IT extension median (IQR): 72.3(53.5-91.3), p < .0001, and for ROI2 less than 50% IT extension median (IQR): 17.5(8-49), and ROI2 50% or greater IT extension median (IQR): 55.8(45.3-81.5), p < .0001. A threshold ROI2 difference of 50 HU resulted in specificity of 92% and sensitivity 60.7% of for IT extension 50% or greater.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients presenting with greater trochanteric fractures, an asymmetric increased density measured by ROI differences within the medullary space of the IT region between the injured and non-injured femur is associated with occult IT extension.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-024-02293-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if difference in Hounsfield Units (HU) of the medullary bone between the injured and non-injured femurs in patients with greater trochanteric fractures is associated with occult intertrochanteric (IT) extension.

Methods: Retrospective review was performed of 81 patients (age range 54-102, 54 females and 27 males) who underwent CT and subsequent MRI after identification of a greater trochanteric fracture without evidence of IT extension on radiography and/or CT. Hounsfield units of the injured and non-injured femurs on CT were recorded at the level of the base of the greater trochanter centrally (ROI1) and the level of the upper border of the lesser trochanter posteromedially (ROI2). The difference between the injured and non-injured femur for each ROI1 and ROI2 were calculated. Absence or presence, and if present, extent of IT extension was assessed on MRI. Analysis was performed to determine if there is correlation of difference in density with presence, and extent of occult IT fractures.

Results: 81 cases met inclusion criteria, 14 (17%) had no IT extension, 11 (14%) had less than 50% IT extension and 56 (69%) had 50% or greater IT extension. There was statistical significance between presence and absence of IT extension between the injured and non-injured femur for ROI1 (HU) no IT extension median (IQR): 18.8(4-40), ROI1 (HU) present IT extension median (IQR): 65.5(46-90) p < .0001, and for ROI2 no IT extension median (IQR): 3(-8-25.5) and ROI2 present IT extension 51(40.5-76), p < .0001. There was statistical significance of the extent of IT extension: ROI1 less than 50% IT extension median (IQR): 37.5(27.5-57), ROI1 50% or greater IT extension median (IQR): 72.3(53.5-91.3), p < .0001, and for ROI2 less than 50% IT extension median (IQR): 17.5(8-49), and ROI2 50% or greater IT extension median (IQR): 55.8(45.3-81.5), p < .0001. A threshold ROI2 difference of 50 HU resulted in specificity of 92% and sensitivity 60.7% of for IT extension 50% or greater.

Conclusion: Patients presenting with greater trochanteric fractures, an asymmetric increased density measured by ROI differences within the medullary space of the IT region between the injured and non-injured femur is associated with occult IT extension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨盆 CT 评估大转子间骨折隐匿性延伸的定量 ROI 差异。
目的:确定股骨大转子骨折患者受伤和未受伤股骨髓质骨的 Hounsfield 单位(HU)差异是否与隐匿性转子间(IT)扩展有关:我们对81名患者(年龄在54-102岁之间,54名女性和27名男性)进行了回顾性检查,这些患者在X光和/或CT检查中发现股骨大转子骨折,但没有IT扩展的迹象,随后接受了CT和MRI检查。在大转子基底中央水平(ROI1)和小转子上缘后内侧水平(ROI2)记录 CT 上受伤股骨和未受伤股骨的 Hounsfield 单位。计算每个 ROI1 和 ROI2 的受伤股骨与未受伤股骨之间的差异。通过核磁共振成像评估股骨内侧伸展是否存在,如果存在,则评估股骨内侧伸展的程度。进行分析以确定密度差异与是否存在隐匿性股骨内侧骨折以及其范围是否存在相关性:81例符合纳入标准,14例(17%)无IT扩展,11例(14%)IT扩展不足50%,56例(69%)IT扩展达到或超过50%。受伤股骨和未受伤股骨之间存在和不存在 IT 延伸之间存在统计学意义,ROI1(HU)无 IT 延伸中位数(IQR):18.8(4-40),ROI1(HU)有 IT 延伸中位数(IQR):65.5(46-90) p 结论:在大转子骨折患者中,受伤股骨与未受伤股骨之间IT区域髓腔内的ROI差异所测量到的非对称密度增加与隐性IT扩展有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Radiology
Emergency Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Exploring the role of CT scouts in expediting MRI in acute stroke. Splenic artery embolization for variceal bleeding in portal hypertension: a systematic review and metanalysis. Radiology resident proficiency in pediatric trauma cases: a comparative analysis based on trauma center status using the WIDI SIM exam. Correction to: Emergency imaging protocols for pregnant patients: a multiinstitutional and multi- specialty comparison of physician education. Reliability of distal radius fracture classification systems: a CT based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1