Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: final analysis of the randomized, phase III RATIONALE-307 trial

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY ESMO Open Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103727
J. Wang , S. Lu , X. Yu , Y. Hu , J. Zhao , M. Sun , Y. Yu , C. Hu , K. Yang , Y. Song , X. Lin , L. Liang , S. Leaw , W. Zheng
{"title":"Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: final analysis of the randomized, phase III RATIONALE-307 trial","authors":"J. Wang ,&nbsp;S. Lu ,&nbsp;X. Yu ,&nbsp;Y. Hu ,&nbsp;J. Zhao ,&nbsp;M. Sun ,&nbsp;Y. Yu ,&nbsp;C. Hu ,&nbsp;K. Yang ,&nbsp;Y. Song ,&nbsp;X. Lin ,&nbsp;L. Liang ,&nbsp;S. Leaw ,&nbsp;W. Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>First-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy alone in advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC) at the interim analysis of the phase III RATIONALE-307 trial. We present the final analysis of this trial.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Patients with treatment-naive, stage IIIB/IV, sq-NSCLC were randomized (1 : 1: 1) to 21-day cycles of i.v.: tislelizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm A); tislelizumab plus <em>nab</em>-paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm B); or paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm C). The primary endpoint was independent review committee-assessed PFS; overall survival was a secondary endpoint.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 360 patients were randomized; 355 received treatment. At the final analysis (median study follow-up: 16.7 months), tislelizumab plus chemotherapy had a manageable safety profile, consistent with that at the interim analysis. Improvement in PFS was maintained for arms A and B versus C {hazard ratio (HR) 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.62] and 0.43 (95% CI 0.31-0.60), respectively}. Overall survival HRs for arms A and B versus C were 0.68 (95% CI 0.46-1.01) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.50-1.12), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The RATIONALE-307 final analysis demonstrated superior clinical benefit with addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy, and a manageable safety profile, as first-line treatment of advanced sq-NSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"9 10","pages":"Article 103727"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702924014972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

First-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy alone in advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC) at the interim analysis of the phase III RATIONALE-307 trial. We present the final analysis of this trial.

Patients and methods

Patients with treatment-naive, stage IIIB/IV, sq-NSCLC were randomized (1 : 1: 1) to 21-day cycles of i.v.: tislelizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm A); tislelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm B); or paclitaxel and carboplatin (arm C). The primary endpoint was independent review committee-assessed PFS; overall survival was a secondary endpoint.

Results

In total, 360 patients were randomized; 355 received treatment. At the final analysis (median study follow-up: 16.7 months), tislelizumab plus chemotherapy had a manageable safety profile, consistent with that at the interim analysis. Improvement in PFS was maintained for arms A and B versus C {hazard ratio (HR) 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.62] and 0.43 (95% CI 0.31-0.60), respectively}. Overall survival HRs for arms A and B versus C were 0.68 (95% CI 0.46-1.01) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.50-1.12), respectively.

Conclusions

The RATIONALE-307 final analysis demonstrated superior clinical benefit with addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy, and a manageable safety profile, as first-line treatment of advanced sq-NSCLC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗:RATIONALE-307 随机 III 期试验的最终分析。
研究目的在III期RATIONALE-307试验的中期分析中,在晚期鳞状非小细胞肺癌(sq-NSCLC)患者中,一线替赛珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗相比可显著改善无进展生存期(PFS)。我们将介绍该试验的最终分析结果:未经治疗的 IIIB/IV 期 sq-NSCLC 患者被随机(1:1:1)分配到 21 天周期的静脉注射:替舒瑞单抗加紫杉醇和卡铂(A 组);替舒瑞单抗加纳布-紫杉醇和卡铂(B 组);或紫杉醇和卡铂(C 组)。主要终点是独立审查委员会评估的PFS;总生存期是次要终点:共有 360 名患者接受了随机治疗,其中 355 人接受了治疗。在最终分析(中位随访时间:16.7个月)中,替赛珠单抗联合化疗的安全性良好,与中期分析结果一致。A组和B组与C组相比,PFS的改善幅度保持不变{危险比(HR)分别为0.45[95%置信区间(CI)0.33-0.62]和0.43(95% CI 0.31-0.60)}。A组和B组与C组相比,总生存率分别为0.68(95% CI 0.46-1.01)和0.75(95% CI 0.50-1.12):RATIONALE-307的最终分析表明,在化疗基础上加用替斯利珠单抗可获得更好的临床疗效,且安全性可控,可作为晚期sq-NSCLC的一线治疗药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ESMO Open
ESMO Open Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
255
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research. ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO. Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.
期刊最新文献
Pazopanib in the real-world setting in soft tissue sarcomas: data from the Italian national registry Identifying predictors of treatment response and molecular changes induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer: the NEOENDO translational study☆ Lurbinectedin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a brief report of the IFCT-2105 LURBICLIN study☆ Maintenance with 5-FU/LV-aflibercept after induction with FOLFIRI-aflibercept versus FOLFIRI-aflibercept until progression as second-line treatment in older adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: the AFEMA phase II randomized trial A machine learning-based analysis of nationwide cancer comprehensive genomic profiling data across cancer types to identify features associated with recommendation of genome-matched therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1