Efficacy and tolerability of house dust mites subcutaneous immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid: an Italian multicenter study.

E Compalati, I Atzeni, S Cabras, P Fancello, R Longo, F Frati
{"title":"Efficacy and tolerability of house dust mites subcutaneous immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid: an Italian multicenter study.","authors":"E Compalati, I Atzeni, S Cabras, P Fancello, R Longo, F Frati","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Subcutaneous immunotherapy is an effective treatment of respiratory allergy and allergoids offer a treatment option characterized by reduced IgE-binding properties to improve the safety profile. Purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and the safety of an injective monomeric allergoid in patients with moderate to severe persistent allergic rhinitis due to house dust mites. <b>Methods.</b> in a perspective, controlled, observational study a suspension of 0.70 mL at 10 BU/mL containing a mixture of carbamylated extract of <i>Dermatophagoides</i> was injected monthly for 12 months, following a 5-weeks build-up phase (0.10-0.20-0.30-0.50-0.70 mL weekly), to 58 patients (mean age 25.1 ± 12.7). A matching group of 60 patients (mean age 34.0 ± 14.2) was observed as control, and both groups were allowed to assume standard pharmacotherapy. After one year, changes from baseline in visual analogue scale for symptoms and drugs intake were compared; satisfaction rate was based on patients' and physicians' judgements. <b>Results.</b> In respect to baseline both groups showed an improvement in symptoms with a significant difference in favor of immunotherapy. Drugs intake was significantly lower in patients receiving injections. High level of agreement was found between doctors and patients on their rate of satisfaction. No serious reactions occurred, and at least a mild episodic local or systemic reaction was reported by a limited number of patients. <b>Conclusions.</b> In routine practice injective monomeric allergoid of house dust mites was safe and associated with a perceived significant clinical benefit in persistent rhinitis shown by objective and subjective outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. Subcutaneous immunotherapy is an effective treatment of respiratory allergy and allergoids offer a treatment option characterized by reduced IgE-binding properties to improve the safety profile. Purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and the safety of an injective monomeric allergoid in patients with moderate to severe persistent allergic rhinitis due to house dust mites. Methods. in a perspective, controlled, observational study a suspension of 0.70 mL at 10 BU/mL containing a mixture of carbamylated extract of Dermatophagoides was injected monthly for 12 months, following a 5-weeks build-up phase (0.10-0.20-0.30-0.50-0.70 mL weekly), to 58 patients (mean age 25.1 ± 12.7). A matching group of 60 patients (mean age 34.0 ± 14.2) was observed as control, and both groups were allowed to assume standard pharmacotherapy. After one year, changes from baseline in visual analogue scale for symptoms and drugs intake were compared; satisfaction rate was based on patients' and physicians' judgements. Results. In respect to baseline both groups showed an improvement in symptoms with a significant difference in favor of immunotherapy. Drugs intake was significantly lower in patients receiving injections. High level of agreement was found between doctors and patients on their rate of satisfaction. No serious reactions occurred, and at least a mild episodic local or systemic reaction was reported by a limited number of patients. Conclusions. In routine practice injective monomeric allergoid of house dust mites was safe and associated with a perceived significant clinical benefit in persistent rhinitis shown by objective and subjective outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用单体过敏原进行屋尘螨皮下免疫疗法的疗效和耐受性:一项意大利多中心研究。
摘要:背景。皮下免疫疗法是治疗呼吸道过敏症的有效方法,类过敏原提供了一种治疗选择,其特点是减少了 IgE 结合特性,从而提高了安全性。本研究的目的是调查注射单体类过敏原对中重度持续性屋尘螨过敏性鼻炎患者的疗效和安全性。方法:在一项透视、对照、观察性研究中,58 名患者(平均年龄为 25.1 ± 12.7 岁)每月注射一次 0.70 mL、浓度为 10 BU/mL 的悬浮液,其中含有氨甲酰化的 Dermatophagoides 提取物混合物,持续 12 个月,然后经过 5 周的积累阶段(每周注射 0.10-0.20-0.30-0.50-0.70 mL)。60 名患者(平均年龄为 34.0 ± 14.2)为对照组,两组患者均可接受标准药物治疗。一年后,比较视觉模拟量表中症状和药物摄入量与基线相比的变化;满意度基于患者和医生的判断。结果显示与基线相比,两组患者的症状都有所改善,但免疫疗法的效果明显优于前者。接受注射治疗的患者药物摄入量明显较低。医生和患者的满意度高度一致。没有出现严重反应,少数患者至少出现了轻微的局部或全身反应。结论在常规实践中,注射屋尘螨单体过敏原是安全的,而且从客观和主观结果来看,对顽固性鼻炎有明显的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
A narrative review on allergy and exposure to domestic and non-domestic animals: favorable and unfavorable effects. An overview of hidden food allergens: need for change to the priority food allergen lists? Cost-effective allergy screening: a retrospective observational study. Efficacy and tolerability of house dust mites subcutaneous immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid: an Italian multicenter study. Different clinical phenotypes in common variable immunodeficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1