Vincent Gélinas, Valérie E Paquet, Maude F Paquet, Antony T Vincent, Steve J Charette
{"title":"Whole-genome-based taxonomy as the most accurate approach to identify Flavobacterium species.","authors":"Vincent Gélinas, Valérie E Paquet, Maude F Paquet, Antony T Vincent, Steve J Charette","doi":"10.1093/femsle/fnae089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The genus Flavobacterium comprises a diversity of species, including fish pathogens. Multiple techniques have been used to identify isolates of this genus, such as phenotyping, polymerase chain reaction genotyping, and in silico whole-genome taxonomy. In this study, we demonstrate that whole-genome-based taxonomy, using average nucleotide identity and molecular phylogeny, is the most accurate approach for Flavobacterium species. We obtained various isolated strains from official collections; these strains had been previously characterized by a third party using various identification methodologies. We analyzed isolates by PCR genotyping using previously published primers targeting gyrB and gyrA genes, which are supposedly specific to the genus Flavobacterium and Flavobacterium psychrophilum, respectively. After genomic analysis, nearly half of the isolates had their identities re-evaluated: around a quarter of them were re-assigned to other genera and two isolates are new species of flavobacteria. In retrospect, the phenotyping method was the least accurate. While gyrB genotyping was accurate with the isolates included in this study, bioinformatics analysis suggests that only 70% of the Flavobacterium species could be appropriately identified using this approach. We propose that whole-genome taxonomy should be used for accurate Flavobacterium identification, and we encourage bacterial collections to review the identification of isolates identified by phenotyping.</p>","PeriodicalId":12214,"journal":{"name":"Fems Microbiology Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fems Microbiology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnae089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The genus Flavobacterium comprises a diversity of species, including fish pathogens. Multiple techniques have been used to identify isolates of this genus, such as phenotyping, polymerase chain reaction genotyping, and in silico whole-genome taxonomy. In this study, we demonstrate that whole-genome-based taxonomy, using average nucleotide identity and molecular phylogeny, is the most accurate approach for Flavobacterium species. We obtained various isolated strains from official collections; these strains had been previously characterized by a third party using various identification methodologies. We analyzed isolates by PCR genotyping using previously published primers targeting gyrB and gyrA genes, which are supposedly specific to the genus Flavobacterium and Flavobacterium psychrophilum, respectively. After genomic analysis, nearly half of the isolates had their identities re-evaluated: around a quarter of them were re-assigned to other genera and two isolates are new species of flavobacteria. In retrospect, the phenotyping method was the least accurate. While gyrB genotyping was accurate with the isolates included in this study, bioinformatics analysis suggests that only 70% of the Flavobacterium species could be appropriately identified using this approach. We propose that whole-genome taxonomy should be used for accurate Flavobacterium identification, and we encourage bacterial collections to review the identification of isolates identified by phenotyping.
期刊介绍:
FEMS Microbiology Letters gives priority to concise papers that merit rapid publication by virtue of their originality, general interest and contribution to new developments in microbiology. All aspects of microbiology, including virology, are covered.
2019 Impact Factor: 1.987, Journal Citation Reports (Source Clarivate, 2020)
Ranking: 98/135 (Microbiology)
The journal is divided into eight Sections:
Physiology and Biochemistry (including genetics, molecular biology and ‘omic’ studies)
Food Microbiology (from food production and biotechnology to spoilage and food borne pathogens)
Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology
Pathogens and Pathogenicity (including medical, veterinary, plant and insect pathogens – particularly those relating to food security – with the exception of viruses)
Environmental Microbiology (including ecophysiology, ecogenomics and meta-omic studies)
Virology (viruses infecting any organism, including Bacteria and Archaea)
Taxonomy and Systematics (for publication of novel taxa, taxonomic reclassifications and reviews of a taxonomic nature)
Professional Development (including education, training, CPD, research assessment frameworks, research and publication metrics, best-practice, careers and history of microbiology)
If you are unsure which Section is most appropriate for your manuscript, for example in the case of transdisciplinary studies, we recommend that you contact the Editor-In-Chief by email prior to submission. Our scope includes any type of microorganism - all members of the Bacteria and the Archaea and microbial members of the Eukarya (yeasts, filamentous fungi, microbial algae, protozoa, oomycetes, myxomycetes, etc.) as well as all viruses.