Analysis of factors associated with postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with urine culture-positive stone lithotripsy.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477119
Xinwei Li, Yuanpeng Zhang, Hailong Ruan, Xiaoping Zhang, Lei Liu
{"title":"Analysis of factors associated with postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with urine culture-positive stone lithotripsy.","authors":"Xinwei Li, Yuanpeng Zhang, Hailong Ruan, Xiaoping Zhang, Lei Liu","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a significant postoperative complication following lithotripsy, particularly in patients with positive urine cultures. Understanding the factors that contribute to the development of SIRS in these patients is crucial for improving clinical outcomes and reducing morbidity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2022 to 2023, patients with preoperative positive urine culture who underwent minimally invasive uroscopic lithotripsy in Wuhan Union Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 393 patients with positive urine cultures underwent endoscopic lithotripsy, and 13.2% (52/393) were diagnosed with SIRS by relevant indicators after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to study the risk factors for the occurrence of SIRS in patients postoperatively, which were preoperative positive WBC in urinalysis (OR = 5.685, <i>p</i> = 0.0051) and postoperative hemoglobin drop of greater than 5 g/L (OR = 2.180, <i>p</i> = 0.0145). Notably, preoperative upper urinary tract drainage was found to be a protective factor (OR = 0.4029, <i>p</i> = 0.0302), and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) value (OR = 1.025, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and procalcitonin (PCT) value (OR = 1.066, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) were predictive factors. Besides, postoperative hemoglobin drop showed a weak correlation with surgical duration (r = 0.1589, <i>p</i> = 0.0016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, our study identifies key factors affecting the occurrence of SIRS after lithotripsy for urine culture-positive stone: preoperative positive WBC in urinalysis, postoperative hemoglobin drop, and preoperative upper urinary tract drainage. And monitoring postoperative CRP and PCT levels helps to predict SIRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1477119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a significant postoperative complication following lithotripsy, particularly in patients with positive urine cultures. Understanding the factors that contribute to the development of SIRS in these patients is crucial for improving clinical outcomes and reducing morbidity.

Materials and methods: From 2022 to 2023, patients with preoperative positive urine culture who underwent minimally invasive uroscopic lithotripsy in Wuhan Union Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: A total of 393 patients with positive urine cultures underwent endoscopic lithotripsy, and 13.2% (52/393) were diagnosed with SIRS by relevant indicators after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to study the risk factors for the occurrence of SIRS in patients postoperatively, which were preoperative positive WBC in urinalysis (OR = 5.685, p = 0.0051) and postoperative hemoglobin drop of greater than 5 g/L (OR = 2.180, p = 0.0145). Notably, preoperative upper urinary tract drainage was found to be a protective factor (OR = 0.4029, p = 0.0302), and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) value (OR = 1.025, p < 0.0001) and procalcitonin (PCT) value (OR = 1.066, p < 0.0001) were predictive factors. Besides, postoperative hemoglobin drop showed a weak correlation with surgical duration (r = 0.1589, p = 0.0016).

Conclusions: In summary, our study identifies key factors affecting the occurrence of SIRS after lithotripsy for urine culture-positive stone: preoperative positive WBC in urinalysis, postoperative hemoglobin drop, and preoperative upper urinary tract drainage. And monitoring postoperative CRP and PCT levels helps to predict SIRS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿培养阳性结石碎石患者术后全身炎症反应综合征相关因素分析。
导言:全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)是碎石术后的一个重要并发症,尤其是在尿培养阳性的患者中。了解导致这些患者发生 SIRS 的因素对于改善临床效果和降低发病率至关重要:回顾性分析了2022年至2023年在武汉协和医院接受微创尿镜碎石术的术前尿培养阳性患者:共有393例尿培养阳性患者接受了内镜碎石术,术后通过相关指标诊断出SIRS的患者占13.2%(52/393)。多变量逻辑回归用于研究患者术后发生 SIRS 的危险因素,即术前尿检白细胞阳性(OR = 5.685,P = 0.0051)和术后血红蛋白下降大于 5 g/L(OR = 2.180,P = 0.0145)。值得注意的是,术前上尿路引流是一个保护因素(OR = 0.4029,P = 0.0302),术后C反应蛋白(CRP)值(OR = 1.025,P = 0.0016)也是一个保护因素:综上所述,我们的研究确定了影响尿培养阳性结石碎石术后 SIRS 发生的关键因素:术前尿检白细胞阳性、术后血红蛋白下降和术前上尿路引流。监测术后 CRP 和 PCT 水平有助于预测 SIRS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
期刊最新文献
Innovative vaginal manipulator technique vs. traditional method for vaginal fornix deployment in robotic sacrocolpopexy. Open laminectomy vs. minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review. Unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery: a meta-analysis unveiling the learning curve and clinical benefits. Compare three deep learning-based artificial intelligence models for classification of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter diagnostic study. Ureteroinguinal hernia: an added advantage for laparoscopy in the management of inguinal hernia-a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1