Unsupervised Clustering of Adult Spinal Deformity Patterns Predicts Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1177/21925682241296481
Renaud Lafage, Junho Song, Jonathan Elysee, Mitchell S Fourman, Justin S Smith, Christopher Ames, Shay Bess, Alan H Daniels, Munish Gupta, Richard Hostin, Han Jo Kim, Eric Klineberg, Gregory Mundis, Bassel G Diebo, Christopher Shaffrey, Frank Schwab, Virginie Lafage, Douglas Burton
{"title":"Unsupervised Clustering of Adult Spinal Deformity Patterns Predicts Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Renaud Lafage, Junho Song, Jonathan Elysee, Mitchell S Fourman, Justin S Smith, Christopher Ames, Shay Bess, Alan H Daniels, Munish Gupta, Richard Hostin, Han Jo Kim, Eric Klineberg, Gregory Mundis, Bassel G Diebo, Christopher Shaffrey, Frank Schwab, Virginie Lafage, Douglas Burton","doi":"10.1177/21925682241296481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo evaluate whether different radiographic clusters of adult spinal deformity identified using artificial intelligence-based clustering are associated with distinct surgical outcomes.MethodsPatients were classified based on the results of a previously conducted analysis that examined clusters of deformity, including Moderate Sagittal (Mod Sag), Severe Sagittal (Sev Sag), Coronal, and Hyper-Thoracic Kyphosis (Hyper-TK). The surgical data, HRQOL, and complication outcomes of these clusters were then compared.ResultsThe final analysis included 1062 patients. Similar to published results on a different patient sample, Mod Sag and Sev Sag patients were older, more likely to have a history of previous spine surgery, and more disabled. By 2-year, all clusters improved in HRQOL and reached a similar rate of minimal clinically important difference (MCID).The Sev Sag cluster had the highest rate major complications (53% vs 34-40%), and complications leading to reoperation (29% vs 17-23%), implant failures (20% vs 8-11%), and operative complications (27% vs 10-17%). Coronal patients had the highest rate of pulmonary complications (9% vs 3-6%) but the lowest rate of X-ray imbalance (10% vs 19-21%). No significant differences were found in neurological complications, infection rate, gastrointestinal, or cardiac events (all <i>P</i> > .1). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a lower time to first complications for the Sev Sag cluster.ConclusionsAll clusters of adult spinal deformity benefit similarly from surgery as they all achieved similar rates of MCID. Although the rates of complications varied among the clusters, the types of complications were not significantly different.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2265-2273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241296481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo evaluate whether different radiographic clusters of adult spinal deformity identified using artificial intelligence-based clustering are associated with distinct surgical outcomes.MethodsPatients were classified based on the results of a previously conducted analysis that examined clusters of deformity, including Moderate Sagittal (Mod Sag), Severe Sagittal (Sev Sag), Coronal, and Hyper-Thoracic Kyphosis (Hyper-TK). The surgical data, HRQOL, and complication outcomes of these clusters were then compared.ResultsThe final analysis included 1062 patients. Similar to published results on a different patient sample, Mod Sag and Sev Sag patients were older, more likely to have a history of previous spine surgery, and more disabled. By 2-year, all clusters improved in HRQOL and reached a similar rate of minimal clinically important difference (MCID).The Sev Sag cluster had the highest rate major complications (53% vs 34-40%), and complications leading to reoperation (29% vs 17-23%), implant failures (20% vs 8-11%), and operative complications (27% vs 10-17%). Coronal patients had the highest rate of pulmonary complications (9% vs 3-6%) but the lowest rate of X-ray imbalance (10% vs 19-21%). No significant differences were found in neurological complications, infection rate, gastrointestinal, or cardiac events (all P > .1). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a lower time to first complications for the Sev Sag cluster.ConclusionsAll clusters of adult spinal deformity benefit similarly from surgery as they all achieved similar rates of MCID. Although the rates of complications varied among the clusters, the types of complications were not significantly different.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人脊柱畸形模式的无监督聚类可预测手术和患者报告结果
研究设计回顾性队列研究:评估使用基于人工智能的聚类方法确定的成人脊柱畸形的不同影像学群组是否与不同的手术结果相关:根据之前进行的畸形群组分析结果对患者进行分类,包括中度矢状突(Mod Sagal)、重度矢状突(Sev Sag)、冠状突和超胸椎后凸(Hyper-TK)。然后对这些分组的手术数据、HRQOL 和并发症结果进行比较:最终分析包括 1062 名患者。与已发表的不同患者样本结果相似,Mod Sag 和 Sev Sag 患者年龄更大,更有可能既往接受过脊柱手术,且残疾程度更高。Sev Sag组的主要并发症发生率最高(53% vs 34-40%),导致再次手术的并发症发生率最高(29% vs 17-23%),植入失败率最高(20% vs 8-11%),手术并发症发生率最高(27% vs 10-17%)。冠状动脉患者的肺部并发症发生率最高(9% vs 3-6%),但X光不平衡发生率最低(10% vs 19-21%)。在神经系统并发症、感染率、胃肠道或心脏事件方面没有发现明显差异(P 均大于 0.1)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,Sev Sag组出现首次并发症的时间较短:结论:所有成人脊柱畸形群组从手术中获益相似,因为它们都达到了相似的MCID率。虽然各组群的并发症发生率不同,但并发症类型并无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Apical Vertebral Translation as a Coronal Risk Factor for Side-Specific Hip Osteoarthritis in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis. Does Gabapentin Use Following ACDF Decrease Opioid Utilization? A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Analysis Conducted in Academic Medical Centers. The Modified 5-Item Frailty Index as a Predictor of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery. Performance Comparison at Different Levels of Surgical Complexity. Opioid Use in Opioid Naive Patients After Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. High-Speed Instance Segmentation for Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Multicenter Validation and Inference Speed Evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1