Outcomes associated with hip preservation using osteochondral allograft transplants and acetabular labrum reconstruction.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS HIP International Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1177/11207000241288445
Kylee Rucinski, James L Cook, Cory R Crecelius, Brett D Crist
{"title":"Outcomes associated with hip preservation using osteochondral allograft transplants and acetabular labrum reconstruction.","authors":"Kylee Rucinski, James L Cook, Cory R Crecelius, Brett D Crist","doi":"10.1177/11207000241288445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation with or without labral reconstruction is considered a hip preservation surgical treatment option for young, active patients. This study aims to report early outcomes for use of OCA and labrum allograft transplants for patients treated for symptomatic femoral head chondral damage and/or acetabular labrum deficiency after implementation of a comprehensive joint restoration approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>33 patients from a lifelong registry were included for analysis. Outcomes were compared for statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) differences based on graft preservation methodology (standard preservation [SP] vs. Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System [MOPS]), and based on surfaces treated (femoral head only, labrum only, or femoral head and labrum).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean follow-up duration was 44.8 (range 12-95) months. Success was documented in 28 (84.8%) patients. For the SP cohort, successful outcomes were documented in 5 cases (50%), while all 23 MOPS cases (100%) were deemed successful at least 1 year after surgery. Hip preservation surgeries performed using MOPS grafts were associated with significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.001; OR = 47x) higher success rates, including significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs at 1 and 2 years after surgery. Revision was performed in 2 patients in the SP cohort and failure requiring total hip arthroplasty was documented in 3 SP patients. Mean time to revision or failure was 23.6 (range 4-43) months. The surfaces treated were significantly associated with failure when comparing patients undergoing a femoral head OCA with or without labral reconstruction to those undergoing labral reconstruction only (<i>p</i> = 0.03; OR = 8.3x).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with symptomatic femoral head cartilage loss and/or irreparable acetabular labrum deficiency undergoing femoral head OCA transplantation and/or labral reconstruction with meniscus allografts using MOPS-preserved tissues experienced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function through at least 2 years after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"11207000241288445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000241288445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation with or without labral reconstruction is considered a hip preservation surgical treatment option for young, active patients. This study aims to report early outcomes for use of OCA and labrum allograft transplants for patients treated for symptomatic femoral head chondral damage and/or acetabular labrum deficiency after implementation of a comprehensive joint restoration approach.

Methods: 33 patients from a lifelong registry were included for analysis. Outcomes were compared for statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences based on graft preservation methodology (standard preservation [SP] vs. Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System [MOPS]), and based on surfaces treated (femoral head only, labrum only, or femoral head and labrum).

Results: Mean follow-up duration was 44.8 (range 12-95) months. Success was documented in 28 (84.8%) patients. For the SP cohort, successful outcomes were documented in 5 cases (50%), while all 23 MOPS cases (100%) were deemed successful at least 1 year after surgery. Hip preservation surgeries performed using MOPS grafts were associated with significantly (p = 0.001; OR = 47x) higher success rates, including significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs at 1 and 2 years after surgery. Revision was performed in 2 patients in the SP cohort and failure requiring total hip arthroplasty was documented in 3 SP patients. Mean time to revision or failure was 23.6 (range 4-43) months. The surfaces treated were significantly associated with failure when comparing patients undergoing a femoral head OCA with or without labral reconstruction to those undergoing labral reconstruction only (p = 0.03; OR = 8.3x).

Conclusions: Patients with symptomatic femoral head cartilage loss and/or irreparable acetabular labrum deficiency undergoing femoral head OCA transplantation and/or labral reconstruction with meniscus allografts using MOPS-preserved tissues experienced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function through at least 2 years after surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用骨软骨同种异体移植和髋臼唇重建术保留髋关节的相关结果。
背景:骨软骨异体移植(OCA)联合或不联合髋臼唇重建被认为是年轻、活跃患者的一种髋关节保护手术治疗选择。本研究旨在报告采用综合关节修复方法治疗无症状股骨头软骨损伤和/或髋臼唇缺损的患者使用 OCA 和髋臼唇同种异体移植的早期疗效。结果:平均随访时间为 44.8 个月:平均随访时间为 44.8 个月(12-95 个月)。28例(84.8%)患者获得成功。SP队列中有5例(50%)成功,而所有23例MOPS患者(100%)在术后至少1年都被认为是成功的。使用 MOPS 移植物进行髋关节保留手术的成功率明显更高(p = 0.001;OR = 47x),包括术后 1 年和 2 年的 PROMs 显著改善,且具有临床意义。SP队列中有2名患者进行了翻修,3名SP患者因手术失败需要进行全髋关节置换术。翻修或失败的平均时间为 23.6 个月(4-43 个月)。与接受或不接受股骨头骨骺重建术的患者相比,仅接受股骨头骨骺重建术的患者的治疗表面与失败有明显关系(P = 0.03; OR = 8.3x):结论:有症状的股骨头软骨缺失和/或不可修复的髋臼唇缺损患者在接受股骨头OCA移植和/或使用MOPS保存组织的半月板异体移植进行唇重建手术后,至少在术后两年内疼痛和功能都会有统计学意义和临床意义的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
期刊最新文献
A prospective multicentre study of 82 prosthetic joint infections treated with a standardised debridement and implant retention (DAIR) protocol followed by 6 weeks of antimicrobial therapy: favourable results. Hounsfield unit values are useful for predicting early outcomes after acetabular fractures: a retrospective study. Total hip arthroplasty in patients under 35 years: a systematic review of the last 2 decades studies. Patients with multiple sclerosis have higher rates of worsening following total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched analysis. A multicentre prospective assessment of the utility of robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty with virtual range of motion on intraoperative implant positioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1