Comparing the effects of three local anaesthetic agents on cardiac conduction system - A randomised study.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-14 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_1185_23
Vaishali Agarwal, Pravin K Das, Soumya S Nath, Manoj Tripathi, Bhuwan Tiwari
{"title":"Comparing the effects of three local anaesthetic agents on cardiac conduction system - A randomised study.","authors":"Vaishali Agarwal, Pravin K Das, Soumya S Nath, Manoj Tripathi, Bhuwan Tiwari","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_1185_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of three local anaesthetic (LA) agents, namely bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, on the cardiac conduction system as assessed by corrected QT (QTc) and P wave dispersion (PWD) intervals in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries and to find the most suitable LA agent that can be used for a long duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 75 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II of either gender in the age group of 18-65 years undergoing elective lower limb orthopaedic surgeries under epidural anaesthesia. These were allocated to groups B (bupivacaine), L (levobupivacaine), and R (ropivacaine). We observed blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, PWD, and QTc intervals from baseline value through Holter monitoring, pain assessment by visual analogue scale, and demand and total volume of LA consumed by patient-controlled analgesia devices. The repeated measures of ANOVA were carried out to find the effect of time and time-to-group interaction among the groups across the periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On intergroup comparison of QTc and PWD, no significant difference among groups was observed, but on intragroup analysis, a statistically significant increase in QTc and PWD from baseline was observed for each of groups B, L, and R at all time intervals. However, the mean increase in QTc and PWD recorded for Group B was higher than in groups L and R.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bupivacaine has the maximal tendency to prolong QTc and PWD. All three agents showed comparable haemodynamic effects and time to onset of sensory and motor blockade.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1185_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: This study aimed to compare the effects of three local anaesthetic (LA) agents, namely bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, on the cardiac conduction system as assessed by corrected QT (QTc) and P wave dispersion (PWD) intervals in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries and to find the most suitable LA agent that can be used for a long duration.

Methods: The study included 75 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II of either gender in the age group of 18-65 years undergoing elective lower limb orthopaedic surgeries under epidural anaesthesia. These were allocated to groups B (bupivacaine), L (levobupivacaine), and R (ropivacaine). We observed blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, PWD, and QTc intervals from baseline value through Holter monitoring, pain assessment by visual analogue scale, and demand and total volume of LA consumed by patient-controlled analgesia devices. The repeated measures of ANOVA were carried out to find the effect of time and time-to-group interaction among the groups across the periods.

Results: On intergroup comparison of QTc and PWD, no significant difference among groups was observed, but on intragroup analysis, a statistically significant increase in QTc and PWD from baseline was observed for each of groups B, L, and R at all time intervals. However, the mean increase in QTc and PWD recorded for Group B was higher than in groups L and R.

Conclusions: Bupivacaine has the maximal tendency to prolong QTc and PWD. All three agents showed comparable haemodynamic effects and time to onset of sensory and motor blockade.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较三种局麻药对心脏传导系统的影响--随机研究。
背景和目的:本研究旨在比较布比卡因、左旋布比卡因和罗哌卡因这三种局麻药对下肢矫形手术中心脏传导系统的影响(通过校正QT(QTc)和P波弥散(PWD)间期评估),并找出最适合长期使用的局麻药:研究对象包括在硬膜外麻醉下接受择期下肢矫形手术的 75 名美国麻醉医师协会体能状态 I 级和 II 级患者,性别不限,年龄在 18-65 岁之间。这些患者被分配到 B 组(布比卡因)、L 组(左布比卡因)和 R 组(罗哌卡因)。我们通过 Holter 监测仪观察血压、心率、呼吸频率、PWD 和 QTc 间期的基线值,通过视觉模拟量表评估疼痛,并通过患者自控镇痛设备观察 LA 的需求量和总用量。通过重复测量方差分析发现了时间和时间-组间交互作用对各组在不同时期的影响:在 QTc 和 PWD 的组间比较中,未观察到各组间的显著差异,但在组内分析中,观察到 B、L 和 R 组在所有时间间隔内的 QTc 和 PWD 与基线相比均有统计学意义上的显著增加。然而,B 组的 QTc 和 PWD 平均增幅高于 L 组和 R 组:结论:布比卡因具有延长 QTc 和 PWD 的最大趋势。所有三种药剂的血流动力学效应以及感觉和运动阻滞开始的时间具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
ABCs of anaesthesia private practice: Adapting, building and conquering. Anaesthetic management of a child with suspected Opitz-Kaveggia syndrome. Awake Seldinger technique-based tracheal intubation in near-total laryngeal obstruction. Bridging the pain gap after cancer surgery - Evaluating the feasibility of transitional pain service to prevent persistent postsurgical pain - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Challenges in central venous catheter placement due to thoracic venous anomaly in an infant - A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1