The current situation with H5N1 avian influenza and the risk to humans

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1111/imj.16550
Michelle Wille, Ian G. Barr
{"title":"The current situation with H5N1 avian influenza and the risk to humans","authors":"Michelle Wille,&nbsp;Ian G. Barr","doi":"10.1111/imj.16550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Influenza in humans is mainly caused by two different viruses: influenza A virus (IAV) and influenza B virus. Beyond humans, IAV infects a broader range of species, including avian, equine, porcine and canine species. In contrast, influenza B virus almost exclusively infects humans. Avian IAVs are categorised in two main ways: by subtype and by pathotype. Subtyping is based on the diversity of the two major surface proteins: haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). These proteins are highly diverse, with 19 HA subtypes and 11 NA subtypes, where the HA-NA combination added together make up the basic identity tag, or subtype, for example, H1N1 and H5N1. To date, only three IAV subtypes have emerged in human populations as pandemic or epidemic viruses over the last century (H1N1, H3N2 and H2N2). Within some HA subtypes, such as H5, viruses may be further characterised into clades based on genetic differences in their HA, somewhat similar to “variants” in SARS-CoV-2.</p><p>Pathotyping is based on pathogenicity in chickens. Low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses, which are frequently found in wild waterbirds, the natural reservoir for these viruses, generally cause no clinical disease in them or other wild birds. Following introduction into poultry, H5 and H7 avian IAVs may evolve and become highly virulent, causing high levels of mortality in poultry (up to 100% in chickens). Consequently, these viruses are referred to as high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) viruses.</p><p>The ancestor of HPAI H5N1 viruses currently causing a global panzootic (animal pandemic) emerged in geese in China in 1996 (referred to as the Goose/Guandong (gs/gd) lineage) and has since evolved into a continuously circulating group of diverse HPAI viruses. Following a series of key events between 2014 and 2020, a subgroup of the HPAI gs/gd H5N1 lineage (known as clade 2.3.4.4b) emerged and spread like wildfire. Since September 2021, the virus has spread globally, with the exception of Oceania (up to August 2024). The host range has also dramatically increased, with more than 400 wild bird species affected,<span><sup>1</sup></span> and as a result of mass mortality events, some avian taxa may never recover.<span><sup>1</sup></span> This virus is also having a substantial impact on the poultry industry. In 2022, more than 130 000 000 chickens died or were culled because of HPAI.<span><sup>2</sup></span> On top of these large-scale mortality events, an enormous diversity (&gt;50 species) of predatory and scavenging mammalian species have been impacted, ranging from foxes to polar bears to house cats.<span><sup>3</sup></span> For most species, infections have only been sporadic; however, in some instances, unprecedented mass mortality events have occurred, such as in pinnipeds (seal and sea lions) in South America.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>In early 2024 this virus entered dairy cows in the USA by an unknown means and has since infected cows in over 195 herds in 13 states (data as of August 2024).<span><sup>5</sup></span> Although the infection in cows leads to transient mild disease, the infection appears to be concentrated in the udders, leading to very high levels of virus in the milk for 4–6 weeks during infection.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Fortunately, the pasteurisation process destroys the viability of the virus,<span><sup>7</sup></span> but dairy workers are still at risk when milking infected cows as the virus remains infectious on milking equipment, and the unpasteurised milk contains very high virus loads.<span><sup>7</sup></span></p><p>Since 1997, HPAI gs/gd H5N1 has caused nearly 900 human cases in 23 countries, with more than half of these cases resulting in death. To date, the majority of human cases have been those associated with contact with infected poultry, sick backyard birds or linked to poultry markets. However, not all H5N1 cases are caused by the same genetic clade, and differing clades seem to be associated with different clinical outcomes. A prime example is the clade that 2.3.4.4b H5N1 HPAI viruses, which are having a severe effect on wildlife and poultry; however, there have been relatively few human cases reported. Since 2021, globally, there have only been 40 detections of HPAI H5/H5N1. Of these, 17 have been because of clade 2.3.4.4b viruses (Fig. 1). Overall, the Food Agriculture Organization/World Organisation for Animal Health/ World Health Organization (FAO/WOAH/WHO) have indicated in a joint assessment published on 14 August 2024 that ‘the global public health risk of influenza A (H5N1) viruses as low’, but the risk for occupationally exposed people to infection ‘can range from low to medium, depending on the nature of exposure, the duration of exposure and the consistent and appropriate use of personal protective equipment’.<span><sup>8</sup></span> To date, four human cases have been caused by contact with infected dairy cows.<span><sup>9</sup></span> Most human cases infected with 2.3.4.4b H5N1 viruses have been mild<span><sup>10</sup></span> and in some cases may have been because of environmental carriage rather than true infections,<span><sup>11</sup></span> whereas humans who have been infected by cattle have reported mainly conjunctivis.<span><sup>10</sup></span> To date, only a single death has been confirmed caused by a clade 2.3.4.4b HPAI virus.<span><sup>10</sup></span> The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Influenza Risk Assessment Tool (IRAT), which uses data from other IAVs, has scored the <i>future</i> pandemic potential of clade 2.3.4.4b as ‘moderate risk’ based on information through 26 June 2024. In a risk comparison between animal influenza strains and subtypes, the 2.3.4.4b currently circulating in cattle has slightly increased in the risk of emergence (but not its impact) compared to other 2.3.4.4b viruses, but its emergence score remained lower than avian H9 and H7N9 viruses found in Asian poultry.<span><sup>12</sup></span></p><p>The ongoing 2.3.4.4b infections across numerous mammalian species are highly concerning, with mammal-to-mammal transmission implicated in outbreaks concerning minks,<span><sup>13</sup></span> pinnipeds<span><sup>4</sup></span> and dairy cows.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Mammal-to-mammal transmission potential has been addressed using ferret experiments. Not only can infection be established in ferrets but it has been demonstrated that these viruses can be transmitted by close contact with naïve ferrets housed in the same cages (and cause disease), but they do not transmit efficiently through aerosols to naïve ferrets separated from the infected animals by a perforated barrier. Four independent studies showed that only four of 18 (22%) ferrets could be infected with different 2.3.4.4b viruses by the aerosol route from infected donors.<span><sup>14-17</sup></span></p><p>For an avian IAV to acquire efficient mammalian transmission through aerosols, several genetic changes would be required. These comprise: (i) changing receptor specificity from avian-type to human-type receptors, i.e. α2.3- to α2.6-linked sialic acids; (ii) increased HA thermostability and pH stability; (iii) increased replication of viruses at temperatures equivalent to those in the mammalian upper respiratory tract; and (iv) changing the expression of RNA transcripts by the viral polymerase complex, resulting in increased replication.</p><p>One of these important changes is a change in the PB2 protein, which is part of the viral replication machinery. A single amino acid change in the PB2 (E627K) causes a change in the polymerase activity, improving the viruses' replication efficiency in mammals.<span><sup>18</sup></span> Interestingly the E627K amino acid change has only rarely been detected in cows infected with the H5N1 in the USA. Other mutations of concern in the PB2 protein which have been shown to increase the polymerase activity of IAVs in mammalian cells or mice, including D701N and Q591K, which were present in viruses detected in pinnipeds in South America<span><sup>4</sup></span>, and T271A (an uncommon mutation) that was identified in a mink H5N1 outbreak in Spain in October 2022.<span><sup>13</sup></span> Higher polymerase activity is likely to lead to higher replication of the virus in a mammalian host. In addition to specific mutations, the mixing of avian IAVs with human or porcine IAVs, might also lead to further mammalian adaptions.<span><sup>19</sup></span> This feature has underpinned all past human pandemic viruses, as all pandemic influenza viruses have contained at least one segment which originated from avian IAV. Fortunately, neither the 2.3.4.4b HPAI viruses nor other HPAI gs/gd H5Nx viruses have found the right combination of mutations or reassortments to make these viruses sufficiently adapted to humans to cause large numbers of human infections, nor have gained the ability to be able to be transmitted efficiently from one infected person to another.</p><p>Globally, it is critical that current, sustained outbreaks in mammals be carefully monitored for the emergence of further mutations, and that these viruses be regularly assessed for their vaccine match, antiviral drug sensitivity, transmission ability in ferret models and binding specificity studies and for pandemic emergence using tools such as IRAT.<span><sup>12</sup></span> In cattle, where control measures are possible, it will be critical to stop spread as continued transmission provides an ‘open air’ experiment for the potential emergence of further mammalian-adapted mutations and spread back into avian populations (which has already occurred) and into other species. Furthermore, H5N1 HPAI viruses for humans must continue to be assessed to ensure that existing candidate vaccine viruses remain well-matched to the circulating strains in the event that vaccines are required. Vaccinations of higher-risk human groups have already begun in some countries, such as Finland.<span><sup>20</sup></span> Effective H5N1 HPAI vaccines for poultry and other livestock may also be useful and could potentially be used to vaccinate threatened, accessible wildlife species.</p><p>Although H5N1 HPAI is not presently in Australia or New Zealand, the risk of arrival with migratory birds is moderate, with high uncertainty. In Australia, nationally coordinated surveillance is undertaken by the National Avian Influenza in Wild Birds group, and response is in accordance with the AUSVETPLAN (https://animalhealthaustralia.com.au/ausvetplan/). Overall, HPAI H5N1 is a complex problem, affecting wildlife, ecosystems, domestic animals, companion animals and humans, and therefore requires a OneHealth response and solution but, fortunately, the risk of this virus progressing to be the cause of the next human pandemic following COVID-19 is currently low.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":"54 11","pages":"1775-1778"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imj.16550","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imj.16550","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Influenza in humans is mainly caused by two different viruses: influenza A virus (IAV) and influenza B virus. Beyond humans, IAV infects a broader range of species, including avian, equine, porcine and canine species. In contrast, influenza B virus almost exclusively infects humans. Avian IAVs are categorised in two main ways: by subtype and by pathotype. Subtyping is based on the diversity of the two major surface proteins: haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). These proteins are highly diverse, with 19 HA subtypes and 11 NA subtypes, where the HA-NA combination added together make up the basic identity tag, or subtype, for example, H1N1 and H5N1. To date, only three IAV subtypes have emerged in human populations as pandemic or epidemic viruses over the last century (H1N1, H3N2 and H2N2). Within some HA subtypes, such as H5, viruses may be further characterised into clades based on genetic differences in their HA, somewhat similar to “variants” in SARS-CoV-2.

Pathotyping is based on pathogenicity in chickens. Low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses, which are frequently found in wild waterbirds, the natural reservoir for these viruses, generally cause no clinical disease in them or other wild birds. Following introduction into poultry, H5 and H7 avian IAVs may evolve and become highly virulent, causing high levels of mortality in poultry (up to 100% in chickens). Consequently, these viruses are referred to as high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) viruses.

The ancestor of HPAI H5N1 viruses currently causing a global panzootic (animal pandemic) emerged in geese in China in 1996 (referred to as the Goose/Guandong (gs/gd) lineage) and has since evolved into a continuously circulating group of diverse HPAI viruses. Following a series of key events between 2014 and 2020, a subgroup of the HPAI gs/gd H5N1 lineage (known as clade 2.3.4.4b) emerged and spread like wildfire. Since September 2021, the virus has spread globally, with the exception of Oceania (up to August 2024). The host range has also dramatically increased, with more than 400 wild bird species affected,1 and as a result of mass mortality events, some avian taxa may never recover.1 This virus is also having a substantial impact on the poultry industry. In 2022, more than 130 000 000 chickens died or were culled because of HPAI.2 On top of these large-scale mortality events, an enormous diversity (>50 species) of predatory and scavenging mammalian species have been impacted, ranging from foxes to polar bears to house cats.3 For most species, infections have only been sporadic; however, in some instances, unprecedented mass mortality events have occurred, such as in pinnipeds (seal and sea lions) in South America.4

In early 2024 this virus entered dairy cows in the USA by an unknown means and has since infected cows in over 195 herds in 13 states (data as of August 2024).5 Although the infection in cows leads to transient mild disease, the infection appears to be concentrated in the udders, leading to very high levels of virus in the milk for 4–6 weeks during infection.6 Fortunately, the pasteurisation process destroys the viability of the virus,7 but dairy workers are still at risk when milking infected cows as the virus remains infectious on milking equipment, and the unpasteurised milk contains very high virus loads.7

Since 1997, HPAI gs/gd H5N1 has caused nearly 900 human cases in 23 countries, with more than half of these cases resulting in death. To date, the majority of human cases have been those associated with contact with infected poultry, sick backyard birds or linked to poultry markets. However, not all H5N1 cases are caused by the same genetic clade, and differing clades seem to be associated with different clinical outcomes. A prime example is the clade that 2.3.4.4b H5N1 HPAI viruses, which are having a severe effect on wildlife and poultry; however, there have been relatively few human cases reported. Since 2021, globally, there have only been 40 detections of HPAI H5/H5N1. Of these, 17 have been because of clade 2.3.4.4b viruses (Fig. 1). Overall, the Food Agriculture Organization/World Organisation for Animal Health/ World Health Organization (FAO/WOAH/WHO) have indicated in a joint assessment published on 14 August 2024 that ‘the global public health risk of influenza A (H5N1) viruses as low’, but the risk for occupationally exposed people to infection ‘can range from low to medium, depending on the nature of exposure, the duration of exposure and the consistent and appropriate use of personal protective equipment’.8 To date, four human cases have been caused by contact with infected dairy cows.9 Most human cases infected with 2.3.4.4b H5N1 viruses have been mild10 and in some cases may have been because of environmental carriage rather than true infections,11 whereas humans who have been infected by cattle have reported mainly conjunctivis.10 To date, only a single death has been confirmed caused by a clade 2.3.4.4b HPAI virus.10 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Influenza Risk Assessment Tool (IRAT), which uses data from other IAVs, has scored the future pandemic potential of clade 2.3.4.4b as ‘moderate risk’ based on information through 26 June 2024. In a risk comparison between animal influenza strains and subtypes, the 2.3.4.4b currently circulating in cattle has slightly increased in the risk of emergence (but not its impact) compared to other 2.3.4.4b viruses, but its emergence score remained lower than avian H9 and H7N9 viruses found in Asian poultry.12

The ongoing 2.3.4.4b infections across numerous mammalian species are highly concerning, with mammal-to-mammal transmission implicated in outbreaks concerning minks,13 pinnipeds4 and dairy cows.5 Mammal-to-mammal transmission potential has been addressed using ferret experiments. Not only can infection be established in ferrets but it has been demonstrated that these viruses can be transmitted by close contact with naïve ferrets housed in the same cages (and cause disease), but they do not transmit efficiently through aerosols to naïve ferrets separated from the infected animals by a perforated barrier. Four independent studies showed that only four of 18 (22%) ferrets could be infected with different 2.3.4.4b viruses by the aerosol route from infected donors.14-17

For an avian IAV to acquire efficient mammalian transmission through aerosols, several genetic changes would be required. These comprise: (i) changing receptor specificity from avian-type to human-type receptors, i.e. α2.3- to α2.6-linked sialic acids; (ii) increased HA thermostability and pH stability; (iii) increased replication of viruses at temperatures equivalent to those in the mammalian upper respiratory tract; and (iv) changing the expression of RNA transcripts by the viral polymerase complex, resulting in increased replication.

One of these important changes is a change in the PB2 protein, which is part of the viral replication machinery. A single amino acid change in the PB2 (E627K) causes a change in the polymerase activity, improving the viruses' replication efficiency in mammals.18 Interestingly the E627K amino acid change has only rarely been detected in cows infected with the H5N1 in the USA. Other mutations of concern in the PB2 protein which have been shown to increase the polymerase activity of IAVs in mammalian cells or mice, including D701N and Q591K, which were present in viruses detected in pinnipeds in South America4, and T271A (an uncommon mutation) that was identified in a mink H5N1 outbreak in Spain in October 2022.13 Higher polymerase activity is likely to lead to higher replication of the virus in a mammalian host. In addition to specific mutations, the mixing of avian IAVs with human or porcine IAVs, might also lead to further mammalian adaptions.19 This feature has underpinned all past human pandemic viruses, as all pandemic influenza viruses have contained at least one segment which originated from avian IAV. Fortunately, neither the 2.3.4.4b HPAI viruses nor other HPAI gs/gd H5Nx viruses have found the right combination of mutations or reassortments to make these viruses sufficiently adapted to humans to cause large numbers of human infections, nor have gained the ability to be able to be transmitted efficiently from one infected person to another.

Globally, it is critical that current, sustained outbreaks in mammals be carefully monitored for the emergence of further mutations, and that these viruses be regularly assessed for their vaccine match, antiviral drug sensitivity, transmission ability in ferret models and binding specificity studies and for pandemic emergence using tools such as IRAT.12 In cattle, where control measures are possible, it will be critical to stop spread as continued transmission provides an ‘open air’ experiment for the potential emergence of further mammalian-adapted mutations and spread back into avian populations (which has already occurred) and into other species. Furthermore, H5N1 HPAI viruses for humans must continue to be assessed to ensure that existing candidate vaccine viruses remain well-matched to the circulating strains in the event that vaccines are required. Vaccinations of higher-risk human groups have already begun in some countries, such as Finland.20 Effective H5N1 HPAI vaccines for poultry and other livestock may also be useful and could potentially be used to vaccinate threatened, accessible wildlife species.

Although H5N1 HPAI is not presently in Australia or New Zealand, the risk of arrival with migratory birds is moderate, with high uncertainty. In Australia, nationally coordinated surveillance is undertaken by the National Avian Influenza in Wild Birds group, and response is in accordance with the AUSVETPLAN (https://animalhealthaustralia.com.au/ausvetplan/). Overall, HPAI H5N1 is a complex problem, affecting wildlife, ecosystems, domestic animals, companion animals and humans, and therefore requires a OneHealth response and solution but, fortunately, the risk of this virus progressing to be the cause of the next human pandemic following COVID-19 is currently low.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
H5N1 禽流感的现状及对人类的风险。
10 美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的流感风险评估工具(IRAT)采用了其他 IAVs 的数据,根据截至 2024 年 6 月 26 日的信息,将 2.3.4.4b 支系未来的大流行可能性评为 "中度风险"。在动物流感毒株和亚型的风险比较中,与其他 2.3.4.4b 病毒相比,目前在牛中流行的 2.3.4.4b 病毒的出现风险略有增加(但影响不大),但其出现评分仍低于在亚洲家禽中发现的禽 H9 和 H7N9 病毒。2.3.4.4b 病毒在众多哺乳动物中的持续感染令人高度担忧,在水貂、13 翼足类动物4 和奶牛5 中爆发的疫情牵涉到哺乳动物之间的传播。雪貂不仅可以被感染,而且已经证明,这些病毒可以通过与饲养在同一笼子中的天真雪貂的密切接触而传播(并导致疾病),但它们不会通过气溶胶有效地传播给被穿孔屏障隔开的天真雪貂。四项独立研究表明,18 只雪貂中只有 4 只(22%)可通过气溶胶途径从受感染的供体处感染不同的 2.3.4.4b 病毒。这些变化包括:(i) 将受体特异性从禽类型受体改为人类型受体,即将α2.3-连接的硅酸改为α2.6-连接的硅酸;(ii) 提高 HA 的热稳定性和 pH 值稳定性;(iii) 提高病毒在哺乳动物上呼吸道等温条件下的复制能力;(iv) 改变病毒聚合酶复合物的 RNA 转录本表达,从而提高复制能力。这些重要变化之一是作为病毒复制机制一部分的 PB2 蛋白发生了变化。PB2 中的一个氨基酸变化(E627K)会导致聚合酶活性发生变化,从而提高病毒在哺乳动物体内的复制效率。18 有趣的是,E627K 氨基酸变化仅在美国感染 H5N1 病毒的奶牛中罕见发现。PB2 蛋白中其他值得关注的突变已被证明可提高 IAV 在哺乳动物细胞或小鼠中的聚合酶活性,包括 D701N 和 Q591K(存在于在南美洲发现的凤尾鱼体内的病毒中)4 以及 T271A(一种不常见的突变)(2022 年 10 月在西班牙水貂 H5N1 疫情中发现)。除了特定变异外,禽类 IAV 与人类或猪 IAV 混合也可能导致哺乳动物的进一步适应。幸运的是,无论是 2.3.4.4b 型高致病性禽流感病毒,还是其他高致病性禽流感 gs/gd H5Nx 病毒,都没有找到适当的变异或重组组合,使这些病毒充分适应人类,造成大量人类感染,也没有获得从一个感染者有效传播到另一个感染者的能力。在全球范围内,关键是要仔细监测目前在哺乳动物中持续爆发的疫情,以防出现进一步的变异,并定期评估这些病毒的疫苗匹配性、抗病毒药物敏感性、在雪貂模型中的传播能力和结合特异性研究,以及利用 IRAT 等工具评估大流行的出现。在有可能采取控制措施的牛群中,阻止传播至关重要,因为持续传播为可能出现更多适应哺乳动物的变异和传播回禽类种群(已经发生)以及其他物种提供了 "露天 "实验。此外,必须继续评估用于人类的 H5N1 高致病性禽流感病毒,以确保在需要疫苗的情况下,现有候选疫苗病毒与流行毒株保持良好匹配。20 用于家禽和其他牲畜的有效 H5N1 高致病性禽流感疫苗也可能有用,并有可能用于受威胁的、可接触到的野生动物物种的疫苗接种。虽然 H5N1 高致病性禽流感目前未在澳大利亚或新西兰出现,但随候鸟迁徙到达的风险为中度,不确定性很高。在澳大利亚,全国野鸟禽流感小组负责全国协调监测工作,并根据澳大利亚禽流感计划(AUSVETPLAN)(https://animalhealthaustralia.com.au/ausvetplan/)采取应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
期刊最新文献
Final results of the National Oncology Mentorship Program 2023 and its impact on burnout and professional fulfilment. Platelet factor 4 immune disease: medical emergencies that look like heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Correction to: 'Managing cancer-related pain in the setting of proven IgE-mediated opioid anaphylaxis'. Real-world impact of pembrolizumab availability for deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer. Environmental impact of large language models in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1