Ying Cao , Jichao Zhu , Bingshao Liang , Yan Guo , Li Ding , Fupin Hu
{"title":"Assessment of lefamulin 20 µg disk versus broth microdilution when tested against common respiratory pathogens","authors":"Ying Cao , Jichao Zhu , Bingshao Liang , Yan Guo , Li Ding , Fupin Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of the disk diffusion test with lefamulin 20 µg compared with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 572 clinical stains, including 240 <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, 211 <em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em>, and 121 <em>Haemophilus influenzae</em>, isolated from 71 medical centres from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network in 2020. BMD method and disk diffusion methods were performed according to CLSI. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very ME (VME) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Lefamulin showed potent activity against <em>S. aureus, S. pneumoniae,</em> and <em>H. influenzae</em>. Using the BMD method, lefamulin inhibited 97.1% of <em>S. aureus</em> isolates at 0.25 mg/L; seven isolates were not susceptible. For <em>S. pneumoniae</em> and <em>H. influenzae,</em> the percentage of susceptibility to lefamulin was 100% and no non-susceptible strains were found in this study. Compared with the reference BMD method, the CA of the lefamulin 20 µg disk testing was 99.8% (571/572), with 14.3% (1/7) VME and no ME. In our study, VME was determined in <em>S. aureus</em>. For <em>S. pneumoniae</em> and <em>H. influenzae</em>, the VME was not determined due to the lack of lefamulin non-susceptible strains.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The lefamulin 20 µg disk diffusion testing showed excellent CA and ME with the reference BMD method for <em>S. aureus, S. pneumoniae,</em> and <em>H. influenzae</em>. The VME exceeding CLSI recommendations may be a bias due to fewer lefamulin non-susceptible isolates. Our results suggest that lefamulin non-susceptible isolates detected by disk diffusion should be confirmed by the reference BMD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"64 6","pages":"Article 107366"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924002826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the performance of the disk diffusion test with lefamulin 20 µg compared with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.
Methods
A total of 572 clinical stains, including 240 Staphylococcus aureus, 211 Streptococcus pneumoniae, and 121 Haemophilus influenzae, isolated from 71 medical centres from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network in 2020. BMD method and disk diffusion methods were performed according to CLSI. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very ME (VME) were calculated.
Results
Lefamulin showed potent activity against S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae. Using the BMD method, lefamulin inhibited 97.1% of S. aureus isolates at 0.25 mg/L; seven isolates were not susceptible. For S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, the percentage of susceptibility to lefamulin was 100% and no non-susceptible strains were found in this study. Compared with the reference BMD method, the CA of the lefamulin 20 µg disk testing was 99.8% (571/572), with 14.3% (1/7) VME and no ME. In our study, VME was determined in S. aureus. For S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, the VME was not determined due to the lack of lefamulin non-susceptible strains.
Conclusions
The lefamulin 20 µg disk diffusion testing showed excellent CA and ME with the reference BMD method for S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae. The VME exceeding CLSI recommendations may be a bias due to fewer lefamulin non-susceptible isolates. Our results suggest that lefamulin non-susceptible isolates detected by disk diffusion should be confirmed by the reference BMD.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.