How long is long enough? An international survey exploring practice variations on the recommended duration of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer and long-term outcomes.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005976
Lucy Haggstrom, Yeh Chen Lee, Clare Scott, Philipp Harter, Linn Woelber, Jonathan Ledermann, Charlie Gourley, Iain A McNeish, Frédéric Amant, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Alexandra Leary, Amit M Oza, Anna Tinker, Antonio González Martin, Sabrina Chiara Cecere, Sandro Pignata, Nicoletta Colombo, Hiroyuki Yoshida, Christian Marth, Ora Rosengarten, Kathleen Nadine Moore, Eva María Gómez-García, David Tan, Michael L Friedlander
{"title":"How long is long enough? An international survey exploring practice variations on the recommended duration of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer and long-term outcomes.","authors":"Lucy Haggstrom, Yeh Chen Lee, Clare Scott, Philipp Harter, Linn Woelber, Jonathan Ledermann, Charlie Gourley, Iain A McNeish, Frédéric Amant, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Alexandra Leary, Amit M Oza, Anna Tinker, Antonio González Martin, Sabrina Chiara Cecere, Sandro Pignata, Nicoletta Colombo, Hiroyuki Yoshida, Christian Marth, Ora Rosengarten, Kathleen Nadine Moore, Eva María Gómez-García, David Tan, Michael L Friedlander","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are no data, and thus no consensus, on the optimal duration of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy for exceptional responders (here defined as progression-free for 5 years or longer) with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The current licence is to continue PARP inhibitors until progression or toxicity; however, international practice varies considerably. The risks of late progression and late-onset myeloid malignancies, defined as occurring beyond 5 years of PARP inhibition, are unknown. This study aims to examine the practice patterns and opinions regarding the management and surveillance protocols of exceptional responders with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online international survey of experts from June 2023 to June 2024 was carried out, disseminated at Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup meetings and by Chairs of Cooperative Groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>210 responses were received from 26 countries including Australia (27 respondents), Germany (24), the UK (21), the Netherlands (16), France (13), Spain (12), Canada (12), Italy (11), Japan (11), and other countries (63). Most respondents did not have institutional or trials group guidelines regarding duration of PARP inhibitors (154, 73.3%). For the minority with guidelines, recommendations varied: 1 year (2), 2 years (13), 3 years (4), and indefinite treatment (22). Individual practice varied considerably for those without guidelines: most (116, 76.3%) recommended ≥5 years of PARP inhibition, of which 73 (48.0%) recommended indefinite PARP inhibition. Sixty-six respondents (31.4%) reported having patients with late progression and 46 (22.0%) had cases with late-onset myeloid malignancies. Surveillance practices varied widely across all respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This international survey highlights the diverse practice variations and disparate views on the optimal duration of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The responses suggest a notable risk of late progression and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia among exceptional responders which needs confirmation. Detailed individual patient data is required to draw more reliable conclusions; another study is underway addressing this.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There are no data, and thus no consensus, on the optimal duration of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy for exceptional responders (here defined as progression-free for 5 years or longer) with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The current licence is to continue PARP inhibitors until progression or toxicity; however, international practice varies considerably. The risks of late progression and late-onset myeloid malignancies, defined as occurring beyond 5 years of PARP inhibition, are unknown. This study aims to examine the practice patterns and opinions regarding the management and surveillance protocols of exceptional responders with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Methods: An online international survey of experts from June 2023 to June 2024 was carried out, disseminated at Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup meetings and by Chairs of Cooperative Groups.

Results: 210 responses were received from 26 countries including Australia (27 respondents), Germany (24), the UK (21), the Netherlands (16), France (13), Spain (12), Canada (12), Italy (11), Japan (11), and other countries (63). Most respondents did not have institutional or trials group guidelines regarding duration of PARP inhibitors (154, 73.3%). For the minority with guidelines, recommendations varied: 1 year (2), 2 years (13), 3 years (4), and indefinite treatment (22). Individual practice varied considerably for those without guidelines: most (116, 76.3%) recommended ≥5 years of PARP inhibition, of which 73 (48.0%) recommended indefinite PARP inhibition. Sixty-six respondents (31.4%) reported having patients with late progression and 46 (22.0%) had cases with late-onset myeloid malignancies. Surveillance practices varied widely across all respondents.

Conclusions: This international survey highlights the diverse practice variations and disparate views on the optimal duration of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The responses suggest a notable risk of late progression and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia among exceptional responders which needs confirmation. Detailed individual patient data is required to draw more reliable conclusions; another study is underway addressing this.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多长时间才算足够长?一项国际调查,探索铂敏感复发性卵巢癌患者使用 PARP 抑制剂维持治疗的推荐时间和长期疗效的实践差异。
目的:对于铂敏感复发性卵巢癌的特异反应者(此处定义为 5 年或更长时间无进展),聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂维持治疗的最佳持续时间尚无数据,因此也未达成共识。目前的许可规定是继续使用 PARP 抑制剂,直至病情进展或出现毒性反应;但国际上的做法有很大差异。晚期进展和晚发髓系恶性肿瘤(定义为 PARP 抑制 5 年后发生)的风险尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨有关铂敏感复发性卵巢癌特殊应答者的管理和监测方案的实践模式和观点:结果:共收到来自 26 个国家的 210 份回复,包括澳大利亚(27 份)、德国(24 份)、英国(21 份)、荷兰(16 份)、法国(13 份)、西班牙(12 份)、加拿大(12 份)、意大利(11 份)、日本(11 份)和其他国家(63 份)。大多数受访者没有关于 PARP 抑制剂用药时间的机构或试验组指南(154 个,73.3%)。在少数有指南的受访者中,建议各不相同:1 年(2 人)、2 年(13 人)、3 年(4 人)和无限期治疗(22 人)。没有指南的受访者的个人实践差异很大:大多数受访者(116 人,76.3%)建议使用 PARP 抑制剂≥5 年,其中 73 人(48.0%)建议无限期使用 PARP 抑制剂。66名受访者(31.4%)报告有晚期进展的患者,46名受访者(22.0%)报告有晚期髓系恶性肿瘤病例。所有受访者的监测方法差异很大:这项国际调查凸显了铂敏感复发性卵巢癌患者在使用 PARP 抑制剂进行维持治疗的最佳疗程方面存在的各种实践差异和不同观点。调查结果表明,在特殊应答者中存在明显的晚期进展和骨髓增生异常综合征/急性髓性白血病风险,这一点需要确认。要得出更可靠的结论,需要详细的个体患者数据;目前正在进行另一项研究来解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
The prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in vulvovaginal melanoma. First robotic radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer using the Hugo RAS platform. Secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer: can we predict the future? Mixed neuroendocrine and endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium: a rare aggressive malignancy. Diaphragmatic and pericardiac ovarian cancer recurrence removal and mesh reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1