Outcome differences of emergency cesarean delivery in the delivery room versus the operating room: A study based on propensity score matching.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15972
Kaisun Zhao, Chunlan Yuan, Shimei He, Jian Yan, Jianchun Huang
{"title":"Outcome differences of emergency cesarean delivery in the delivery room versus the operating room: A study based on propensity score matching.","authors":"Kaisun Zhao, Chunlan Yuan, Shimei He, Jian Yan, Jianchun Huang","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to compare the risks and outcomes associated with category I cesarean section procedures performed in the delivery room versus those performed in the operating room.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The analysis included 126 singleton pregnant women who underwent inpatient delivery at the Second People's Hospital of Nanning between January 2021 and May 2024. Following propensity score matching, 21 cases were in the delivery room group, and 105 cases were in the operating room group. Parameters under investigation encompassed decision-to-delivery interval, incision-to-delivery interval, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative antibiotic duration, postoperative hospital stay length, postoperative fever incidence, adverse neonatal outcomes, and blood routine parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The decision-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the delivery room group than in the operating room group. Conversely, the delivery room group exhibited longer surgical durations, higher blood loss, prolonged postoperative antibiotic usage, extended hospital stays, and elevated white blood cell counts with statistical significance (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, no notable variations were observed between the groups in maternal and neonatal outcome indicators, such as adverse neonatal outcomes and postoperative fever rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outcomes suggest that the delivery room group showed increased risks compared with the operating room group, potentially indicating heightened vulnerabilities to bleeding and infection. Hence, it is advisable for patients to undergo surgery in the operating room unless the delivery room is equipped with sterile surgical facilities or in cases of urgent necessity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to compare the risks and outcomes associated with category I cesarean section procedures performed in the delivery room versus those performed in the operating room.

Patients and methods: The analysis included 126 singleton pregnant women who underwent inpatient delivery at the Second People's Hospital of Nanning between January 2021 and May 2024. Following propensity score matching, 21 cases were in the delivery room group, and 105 cases were in the operating room group. Parameters under investigation encompassed decision-to-delivery interval, incision-to-delivery interval, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative antibiotic duration, postoperative hospital stay length, postoperative fever incidence, adverse neonatal outcomes, and blood routine parameters.

Results: The decision-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the delivery room group than in the operating room group. Conversely, the delivery room group exhibited longer surgical durations, higher blood loss, prolonged postoperative antibiotic usage, extended hospital stays, and elevated white blood cell counts with statistical significance (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, no notable variations were observed between the groups in maternal and neonatal outcome indicators, such as adverse neonatal outcomes and postoperative fever rates.

Conclusions: The outcomes suggest that the delivery room group showed increased risks compared with the operating room group, potentially indicating heightened vulnerabilities to bleeding and infection. Hence, it is advisable for patients to undergo surgery in the operating room unless the delivery room is equipped with sterile surgical facilities or in cases of urgent necessity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产房与手术室紧急剖宫产的结果差异:基于倾向得分匹配的研究。
目的本研究旨在比较在产房与在手术室进行I类剖宫产手术的相关风险和结果:分析对象包括2021年1月至2024年5月期间在南宁市第二人民医院住院分娩的126名单胎孕妇。经过倾向评分匹配,产房组 21 例,手术室组 105 例。研究参数包括从决定到分娩的时间间隔、从切口到分娩的时间间隔、手术时间、术中失血量、术后抗生素使用时间、术后住院时间、术后发热发生率、新生儿不良结局和血常规参数:产房组从决定到分娩的间隔时间明显短于手术室组。相反,产房组的手术时间更长、失血量更高、术后使用抗生素时间更长、住院时间更长、白细胞计数升高,且差异有统计学意义(P 结论:结果表明,产房组与手术室组相比,手术时间更长、失血量更高、术后使用抗生素时间更长、住院时间更长、白细胞计数升高,且差异有统计学意义(P):结果表明,与手术室组相比,产房组的风险更高,这可能表明更容易出血和感染。因此,建议患者在手术室接受手术,除非产房配备了无菌手术设施或有迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study. Proposal for a new classification of intrauterine adhesions by sites. Retraction: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of a Cervical Traction Maneuver (Amr's Maneuver) on the Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Retracted: Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single-center randomized control trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1