Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Response during High-frequency Yoga Breathing, Breath Awareness, and Quiet Rest.

IF 1.1 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE International Journal of Yoga Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_225_23
Shirley Telles, Dipak Chetry, Acharya Balkrishna
{"title":"Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Response during High-frequency Yoga Breathing, Breath Awareness, and Quiet Rest.","authors":"Shirley Telles, Dipak Chetry, Acharya Balkrishna","doi":"10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_225_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Yoga breathing influences cortical activity and, hence, cortico-efferent sensory activity. Previously, slow yoga breathing influenced the components of mid-latency auditory evoked potentials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to compare middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEPs) recorded during (i) High-frequency yoga breathing (HFYB), (ii) Breath awareness (BAW), and (iii) Quiet rest (QR) as a control in experienced yoga practitioners.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The MLAEPs were recorded before, during, and after the practice of HFYB compared to an equal duration of BAW and QR in 22 university students whose ages ranged from 18 to 28 years, recorded from the vertex referenced to linked earlobes and the ground electrode on forehead.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The peak amplitude of the Pa wave was significantly increased during HFYB compared to before HFYB (repeated measures ANOVA, <i>post hoc</i> analysis with least significant difference, <i>P</i> < 0.05). During BAW, the peak amplitude of the Na wave was significantly increased compared to before BAW (<i>P</i> < 0.05). During QR, the peak latency of \"Pa\" and \"Nb\" waves was significantly increased compared to before QR (<i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that changes in MLAEPs during HFYB, BAW, and QR were different and distinct. Both interventional sessions appear to increase the recruitment of neural resources in the primary auditory cortex, whereas QR appears to slow transmission within the thalamic reticular projection to the cortex. Generalizing the findings is restricted by the sample being confined to male experienced practitioners of yoga breathing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14436,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Yoga","volume":"17 2","pages":"101-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Yoga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_225_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Yoga breathing influences cortical activity and, hence, cortico-efferent sensory activity. Previously, slow yoga breathing influenced the components of mid-latency auditory evoked potentials.

Objective: The present study aimed to compare middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEPs) recorded during (i) High-frequency yoga breathing (HFYB), (ii) Breath awareness (BAW), and (iii) Quiet rest (QR) as a control in experienced yoga practitioners.

Materials and methods: The MLAEPs were recorded before, during, and after the practice of HFYB compared to an equal duration of BAW and QR in 22 university students whose ages ranged from 18 to 28 years, recorded from the vertex referenced to linked earlobes and the ground electrode on forehead.

Results: The peak amplitude of the Pa wave was significantly increased during HFYB compared to before HFYB (repeated measures ANOVA, post hoc analysis with least significant difference, P < 0.05). During BAW, the peak amplitude of the Na wave was significantly increased compared to before BAW (P < 0.05). During QR, the peak latency of "Pa" and "Nb" waves was significantly increased compared to before QR (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that changes in MLAEPs during HFYB, BAW, and QR were different and distinct. Both interventional sessions appear to increase the recruitment of neural resources in the primary auditory cortex, whereas QR appears to slow transmission within the thalamic reticular projection to the cortex. Generalizing the findings is restricted by the sample being confined to male experienced practitioners of yoga breathing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高频瑜伽呼吸、呼吸意识和安静休息时的中潜伏期听觉诱发反应。
背景:瑜伽呼吸会影响大脑皮层活动,进而影响皮质传入感觉活动。以前,缓慢的瑜伽呼吸会影响中潜伏期听觉诱发电位的成分:本研究旨在比较经验丰富的瑜伽练习者在(i)高频瑜伽呼吸(HFYB)、(ii)呼吸意识(BAW)和(iii)安静休息(QR)时记录的中潜听觉诱发电位(MLAEPs):对 22 名年龄在 18 至 28 岁之间的大学生在练习 HFYB 之前、期间和之后的 MLAEPs 进行记录,并与同等持续时间的 BAW 和 QR 进行比较:与HFYB前相比,HFYB时Pa波的峰值振幅明显增加(重复测量方差分析,差异最小的事后分析,P < 0.05)。在 BAW 期间,Na 波的峰值振幅与 BAW 前相比明显增加(P < 0.05)。QR期间,与QR前相比,"Pa "波和 "Nb "波的峰值潜伏期明显增加(P < 0.01):研究结果表明,HFYB、BAW 和 QR 期间 MLAEPs 的变化各不相同且截然不同。两个干预过程似乎都增加了初级听皮层神经资源的招募,而 QR 似乎减缓了丘脑网状投射到皮层的传输。由于样本仅限于经验丰富的男性瑜伽呼吸练习者,因此研究结果的推广受到了限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Yoga
International Journal of Yoga INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Supervised Yogic Intervention on Pain Status, Flexibility, and Corticomotor Excitability in Fibromyalgia Patients: A Unique Case Report. Effect of Volitional Modification of Breath Frequency on Attention and Mood States: An Exploratory Randomized Crossover Study. Efficacy of Standardized Yoga Asanas as Add-on Therapy in the Management of Hypothyroidism: A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled Clinical Study. Impact of Nada Yoga Music Therapy on Anxiety and Quality of Life in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Influence of High-frequency Yoga Breathing (Kapalabhati) on States Changes in Gamma Oscillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1