Pregabalin for Neuropathic Pain and Itch in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY JAMA dermatology Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3767
Margarita Calvo, Macarena Tejos-Bravo, Alvaro Passi-Solar, Fernanda Espinoza, Ignacia Fuentes, Irene Lara-Corrales, Elena Pope
{"title":"Pregabalin for Neuropathic Pain and Itch in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Randomized Crossover Trial.","authors":"Margarita Calvo, Macarena Tejos-Bravo, Alvaro Passi-Solar, Fernanda Espinoza, Ignacia Fuentes, Irene Lara-Corrales, Elena Pope","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) experience neuropathic pain and itch. There is a lack of evidence on any treatment for these symptoms in patients with RDEB.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To test the efficacy of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain and itch in patients with RDEB.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial of oral pregabalin (50-300 mg/d) vs placebo was conducted at 2 sites, Toronto (Canada) and Santiago (Chile) from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Patients eligible to participate were diagnosed with RDEB, aged 8 to 40 years, not pregnant or lactating (if female), and had evidence of probable neuropathic pain and itching defined as distal thermal sensory loss (confirmed by thermal roller), score of 4 or greater on the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4), and score greater than 4 on the 10-point visual analog scale [VAS]). Patients with a clinically important or poorly controlled medical or psychiatric condition or pregabalin intolerance or allergy were excluded. Of 41 patients screened, 3 were not eligible and 28 declined enrollment. Data analyses were performed in 2021 through 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants received both pregabalin and matched placebo (titrated to a maximum-tolerated dose of 300 mg/day) in a randomized sequence so that comparisons could be made within participants and between groups.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Difference in the mean pain and itch scores between pregabalin and placebo treatment (measured using VAS) before and after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 10 participants were randomized to 2 groups, 6 patients (mean [SD] age, 26.7 [8.1] years; 3 females [50%]) in group 1, and 4 patients (mean [SD] age, 26.5 [7.8] years, 2 females [50%]) in group 2. Group 1 received a sequence of pregabalin-placebo while group 2 received placebo-pregabalin. Pregabalin significantly reduced mean (SD) pain scores by 1.9 (1.5) points when controlling for sequence and treatment period vs baseline, while placebo had 0.1 (2.0) points of reduction. The effect of pregabalin was a mild but significant reduction in itch compared to baseline (mean [SD] points, 0.9 [2.2]), whereas the placebo produced no reduction (0.1 [2.5]). The mean pregabalin dose was generally well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this randomized crossover trial indicate that pregabalin significantly reduced pain and itch scores from baseline compared to placebo in patients with RDEB. This feasibility study provided preliminary data on the efficacy of pregabalin in managing pain and itch in RDEB and gathered essential data to inform the design of a larger cohort trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03928093.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3767","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) experience neuropathic pain and itch. There is a lack of evidence on any treatment for these symptoms in patients with RDEB.

Objectives: To test the efficacy of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain and itch in patients with RDEB.

Design, setting, and participants: A randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial of oral pregabalin (50-300 mg/d) vs placebo was conducted at 2 sites, Toronto (Canada) and Santiago (Chile) from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Patients eligible to participate were diagnosed with RDEB, aged 8 to 40 years, not pregnant or lactating (if female), and had evidence of probable neuropathic pain and itching defined as distal thermal sensory loss (confirmed by thermal roller), score of 4 or greater on the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4), and score greater than 4 on the 10-point visual analog scale [VAS]). Patients with a clinically important or poorly controlled medical or psychiatric condition or pregabalin intolerance or allergy were excluded. Of 41 patients screened, 3 were not eligible and 28 declined enrollment. Data analyses were performed in 2021 through 2023.

Intervention: Participants received both pregabalin and matched placebo (titrated to a maximum-tolerated dose of 300 mg/day) in a randomized sequence so that comparisons could be made within participants and between groups.

Main outcomes and measures: Difference in the mean pain and itch scores between pregabalin and placebo treatment (measured using VAS) before and after intervention.

Results: In all, 10 participants were randomized to 2 groups, 6 patients (mean [SD] age, 26.7 [8.1] years; 3 females [50%]) in group 1, and 4 patients (mean [SD] age, 26.5 [7.8] years, 2 females [50%]) in group 2. Group 1 received a sequence of pregabalin-placebo while group 2 received placebo-pregabalin. Pregabalin significantly reduced mean (SD) pain scores by 1.9 (1.5) points when controlling for sequence and treatment period vs baseline, while placebo had 0.1 (2.0) points of reduction. The effect of pregabalin was a mild but significant reduction in itch compared to baseline (mean [SD] points, 0.9 [2.2]), whereas the placebo produced no reduction (0.1 [2.5]). The mean pregabalin dose was generally well tolerated.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this randomized crossover trial indicate that pregabalin significantly reduced pain and itch scores from baseline compared to placebo in patients with RDEB. This feasibility study provided preliminary data on the efficacy of pregabalin in managing pain and itch in RDEB and gathered essential data to inform the design of a larger cohort trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03928093.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普瑞巴林治疗隐性萎缩性表皮松解症患者的神经痛和痒:随机交叉试验。
重要性:隐性萎缩性表皮松解症(RDEB)患者会出现神经性疼痛和瘙痒。目前尚缺乏治疗 RDEB 患者这些症状的证据:测试普瑞巴林治疗 RDEB 患者神经性疼痛和瘙痒的疗效:从 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日,在加拿大多伦多和智利圣地亚哥两地进行了口服普瑞巴林(50-300 毫克/天)与安慰剂的随机、双盲、交叉试验。符合参与条件的患者被诊断为 RDEB,年龄在 8-40 岁之间,未怀孕或哺乳(如果是女性),有证据显示可能存在神经性疼痛和瘙痒,定义为远端热感觉缺失(通过热滚筒确认),Douleur Neuropathique 4 问卷 (DN4) 得分大于等于 4 分,10 点视觉模拟量表 [VAS] 得分大于 4 分)。患有临床重要或控制不佳的内科或精神科疾病或对普瑞巴林不耐受或过敏的患者被排除在外。在筛选出的 41 名患者中,3 人不符合条件,28 人拒绝入组。数据分析于 2021 年至 2023 年进行:参与者按随机顺序接受普瑞巴林和匹配的安慰剂(滴定至最大耐受剂量 300 毫克/天),以便在参与者内部和组间进行比较:干预前后普瑞巴林和安慰剂治疗的平均疼痛和瘙痒评分差异(使用 VAS 测量):共有 10 名参与者被随机分为两组,第一组有 6 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 26.7 [8.1] 岁;3 名女性 [50%]),第二组有 4 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 26.5 [7.8] 岁;2 名女性 [50%]),第一组接受普瑞巴林-安慰剂治疗,第二组接受安慰剂-普瑞巴林治疗。如果控制顺序和治疗时间与基线相比,普瑞巴林能明显降低平均(标度)疼痛评分 1.9 (1.5) 分,而安慰剂能降低 0.1 (2.0) 分。与基线相比,普瑞巴林的作用是轻微但显著地减轻瘙痒(平均[标度]分,0.9 [2.2]分),而安慰剂没有减轻作用(0.1 [2.5]分)。普瑞巴林的平均剂量总体上耐受性良好:这项随机交叉试验的结果表明,与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林能显著降低 RDEB 患者的疼痛和瘙痒评分。这项可行性研究提供了普瑞巴林治疗RDEB疼痛和瘙痒疗效的初步数据,并为设计更大规模的队列试验收集了重要数据:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03928093。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
期刊最新文献
Annular Eroded Plaque With Honey-Colored Crusting On Scrotum. Error in Figure 2. Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil Initiation for Patients With Hair Loss: An International Modified Delphi Consensus Statement. Salt and Atopic Dermatitis. Salt and Atopic Dermatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1