Identification of vancomycin exposure target in neonates: how much is enough?

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1093/jac/dkae374
Yuan Gao, Tong Wu, Libin Pu, Xingfang Ji, Zhipeng Wang, Fan Wang, Chang Wang, Xia Song, Wen Qiu
{"title":"Identification of vancomycin exposure target in neonates: how much is enough?","authors":"Yuan Gao, Tong Wu, Libin Pu, Xingfang Ji, Zhipeng Wang, Fan Wang, Chang Wang, Xia Song, Wen Qiu","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkae374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Vancomycin is commonly used in neonates with the same pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target as adults. However, no evidence supports this practice, and the association between trough concentrations and treatment outcomes has been widely questioned. This study aimed to identify the optimal PK/PD predictor and assess the correlation between AUC/MIC, trough concentration and the vancomycin efficacy in neonates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively collected neonates who used vancomycin and constructed a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model to estimate the AUC. Logistic analyses were used to identify the variables related to efficacy. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to explore thresholds. The correlation between trough concentration and AUC/MIC on the first day was analysed using a linear regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPK modelling involved 131 neonates. Postmenstrual age and current weight were included in the covariate analysis. Forty-eight patients were included in the efficacy analysis, 13 of whom were infected with MRSA. The best-performance PK/PD target for efficacy was AUC0-24  h/MIC ≥ 331. The trough concentration was correlated with AUC0-24  h/MIC (r2 = 0.32), but individual differences existed. AUC0-24  h/MIC ranged up to 2.5-fold for a given trough concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AUC0-24  h/MIC ≥ 331 was the optimal target of vancomycin efficacy in neonates. The trough concentration was not a reliable predictor of efficacy and AUC0-24  h/MIC. AUC-guided dosage adjustments are more valuable in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Vancomycin is commonly used in neonates with the same pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target as adults. However, no evidence supports this practice, and the association between trough concentrations and treatment outcomes has been widely questioned. This study aimed to identify the optimal PK/PD predictor and assess the correlation between AUC/MIC, trough concentration and the vancomycin efficacy in neonates.

Methods: This study retrospectively collected neonates who used vancomycin and constructed a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model to estimate the AUC. Logistic analyses were used to identify the variables related to efficacy. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to explore thresholds. The correlation between trough concentration and AUC/MIC on the first day was analysed using a linear regression model.

Results: PPK modelling involved 131 neonates. Postmenstrual age and current weight were included in the covariate analysis. Forty-eight patients were included in the efficacy analysis, 13 of whom were infected with MRSA. The best-performance PK/PD target for efficacy was AUC0-24  h/MIC ≥ 331. The trough concentration was correlated with AUC0-24  h/MIC (r2 = 0.32), but individual differences existed. AUC0-24  h/MIC ranged up to 2.5-fold for a given trough concentration.

Conclusions: AUC0-24  h/MIC ≥ 331 was the optimal target of vancomycin efficacy in neonates. The trough concentration was not a reliable predictor of efficacy and AUC0-24  h/MIC. AUC-guided dosage adjustments are more valuable in clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿万古霉素暴露目标的确定:多少剂量才足够?
目的:万古霉素通常用于新生儿,其药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)目标与成人相同。然而,没有证据支持这种做法,而且谷浓度与治疗效果之间的关联受到广泛质疑。本研究旨在确定最佳的 PK/PD 预测指标,并评估 AUC/MIC、谷浓度与新生儿万古霉素疗效之间的相关性:本研究回顾性收集了使用万古霉素的新生儿,并构建了群体药代动力学(PPK)模型来估算AUC。采用逻辑分析确定与疗效相关的变量。分类和回归树分析用于探索阈值。使用线性回归模型分析了第一天的谷浓度和AUC/MIC之间的相关性:131名新生儿参与了PPK建模。经后年龄和当前体重被纳入协变量分析。48名患者被纳入疗效分析,其中13人感染了MRSA。疗效的最佳PK/PD目标是AUC0-24 h/MIC≥331。谷浓度与 AUC0-24 h/MIC 相关(r2 = 0.32),但存在个体差异。在给定的谷浓度下,AUC0-24 h/MIC最高可达2.5倍:结论:AUC0-24 h/MIC ≥ 331是新生儿万古霉素疗效的最佳目标值。谷浓度并不能可靠地预测疗效和 AUC0-24 h/MIC。AUC指导的剂量调整在临床应用中更有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of eravacycline susceptibility testing methods in 587 clinical carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates: broth microdilution, MIC test strip and disc diffusion. Efficacy and tolerability of high-dose cefalexin 45 mg/kg/dose (maximum 1.5 g) three times daily in children with bone and joint infections. Outcomes after a virological failure to first-line second-generation INSTI-based therapy in a real-life setting. Comment on: Skin pharmacokinetics of miltefosine in the treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in South Asia. Insights into interspecies protein binding variability using clindamycin as an example.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1