Nine Years of Continuous Flow LVAD (HeartMate 3): Survival and LVAD-Related Complications before and after Hospital Discharge.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.3390/jcdd11100301
Rodrigo Sandoval Boburg, Spiros Lukas Marinos, Michael Baumgaertner, Christian Jörg Rustenbach, Christoph Salewski, Isabelle Doll, Rafal Berger, Christian Schlensak, Medhat Radwan
{"title":"Nine Years of Continuous Flow LVAD (HeartMate 3): Survival and LVAD-Related Complications before and after Hospital Discharge.","authors":"Rodrigo Sandoval Boburg, Spiros Lukas Marinos, Michael Baumgaertner, Christian Jörg Rustenbach, Christoph Salewski, Isabelle Doll, Rafal Berger, Christian Schlensak, Medhat Radwan","doi":"10.3390/jcdd11100301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-stage heart failure is associated with high mortality. Recent developments such as the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) have improved patient outcomes. The HeartMate 3 LVAD is a novel centrifugal pump that was developed to provide hemodynamic support in heart failure patients, either as a bridge-to-transplant (BTT), myocardial recovery, or destination therapy (DT). Our objective was to evaluate the survival rates and LVAD-related complications of the HeartMate 3 LVAD before and after hospital discharge in our center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed all patients implanted with the HeartMate 3 LVAD in our institute between September 2015 and June 2024. Patients who received a Heart Ware Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD) and HeartMate 2 LVAD devices were excluded. The primary endpoint was survival before and after hospital discharge. The secondary endpoints included an incidence of serious LVAD adverse events (bleeding, major infection, hemolysis, device thrombosis and malfunction, and neurological dysfunction) and the causes of re-admission along the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 consecutive HeartMate 3 LVAD patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 56.1 ± 10.6 years. A total of 72.9% of patients received LVAD therapy as a BTT, 14.6% as DT, 10.4% as a bridge-to-decision, and 2.1% as a bridge-to-recovery. A total of 85.4% of patients were discharged after implantation. The main cause for in-hospital mortality was right ventricular failure (8.3%), followed by stroke, abdominal bleeding, and multi-organ failure (2.1% each). One patient (2.1%) had successful heart transplantation, 26 patients (63.4%) are still on LVAD support, and 11 (26.8%) patients have died during follow-up. The main cause of mortality after hospital discharge was sepsis, which occurred in 9.8% of patients, followed by right ventricular failure, non-LVAD-related causes, unknown causes with two (4.9%) cases each, and one case of fatal stroke (2.4%). During the follow-up, there was no need for LVAD replacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HeartMate 3 LVAD is associated with excellent in-hospital survival rates in patients with end-stage heart failure. Right ventricular failure was the main cause of death before hospital discharge, whereas sepsis was the main cause of death after hospital discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"11 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11100301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: End-stage heart failure is associated with high mortality. Recent developments such as the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) have improved patient outcomes. The HeartMate 3 LVAD is a novel centrifugal pump that was developed to provide hemodynamic support in heart failure patients, either as a bridge-to-transplant (BTT), myocardial recovery, or destination therapy (DT). Our objective was to evaluate the survival rates and LVAD-related complications of the HeartMate 3 LVAD before and after hospital discharge in our center.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients implanted with the HeartMate 3 LVAD in our institute between September 2015 and June 2024. Patients who received a Heart Ware Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD) and HeartMate 2 LVAD devices were excluded. The primary endpoint was survival before and after hospital discharge. The secondary endpoints included an incidence of serious LVAD adverse events (bleeding, major infection, hemolysis, device thrombosis and malfunction, and neurological dysfunction) and the causes of re-admission along the follow-up period.

Results: A total of 48 consecutive HeartMate 3 LVAD patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 56.1 ± 10.6 years. A total of 72.9% of patients received LVAD therapy as a BTT, 14.6% as DT, 10.4% as a bridge-to-decision, and 2.1% as a bridge-to-recovery. A total of 85.4% of patients were discharged after implantation. The main cause for in-hospital mortality was right ventricular failure (8.3%), followed by stroke, abdominal bleeding, and multi-organ failure (2.1% each). One patient (2.1%) had successful heart transplantation, 26 patients (63.4%) are still on LVAD support, and 11 (26.8%) patients have died during follow-up. The main cause of mortality after hospital discharge was sepsis, which occurred in 9.8% of patients, followed by right ventricular failure, non-LVAD-related causes, unknown causes with two (4.9%) cases each, and one case of fatal stroke (2.4%). During the follow-up, there was no need for LVAD replacement.

Conclusions: HeartMate 3 LVAD is associated with excellent in-hospital survival rates in patients with end-stage heart failure. Right ventricular failure was the main cause of death before hospital discharge, whereas sepsis was the main cause of death after hospital discharge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续流 LVAD(HeartMate 3)九年:出院前后的存活率和 LVAD 相关并发症。
背景:终末期心力衰竭的死亡率很高。左心室辅助装置(LVAD)等最新研发成果改善了患者的预后。HeartMate 3 LVAD 是一种新型离心泵,其开发目的是为心衰患者提供血液动力学支持,作为移植前桥(BTT)、心肌恢复或终点治疗(DT)。我们的目的是评估本中心的 HeartMate 3 LVAD 出院前后的存活率和 LVAD 相关并发症:我们对 2015 年 9 月至 2024 年 6 月期间在我院植入 HeartMate 3 LVAD 的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。接受心脏器械心室辅助装置(HVAD)和HeartMate 2 LVAD装置的患者被排除在外。主要终点是出院前后的存活率。次要终点包括 LVAD 严重不良事件(出血、重大感染、溶血、装置血栓形成和故障以及神经功能障碍)的发生率以及随访期间再次入院的原因:共有 48 名 HeartMate 3 LVAD 患者参与了这项研究。平均年龄为(56.1 ± 10.6)岁。72.9%的患者在接受 LVAD 治疗时进行了 BTT,14.6%进行了 DT,10.4%进行了 "决定之桥",2.1%进行了 "恢复之桥"。共有85.4%的患者在植入后出院。院内死亡的主要原因是右心室功能衰竭(8.3%),其次是中风、腹腔出血和多器官功能衰竭(各占2.1%)。一名患者(2.1%)成功进行了心脏移植,26 名患者(63.4%)仍在接受 LVAD 支持,11 名患者(26.8%)在随访期间死亡。出院后死亡的主要原因是脓毒症,占患者总数的 9.8%,其次是右心室衰竭、非 LVAD 相关原因和不明原因,各占 2 例(4.9%),还有 1 例致命中风(2.4%)。在随访期间,没有人需要更换 LVAD:结论:对于终末期心力衰竭患者,HeartMate 3 LVAD具有良好的院内存活率。右心室衰竭是出院前的主要死因,而脓毒症则是出院后的主要死因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Rehabilitation After Open Heart Surgery: A Narrative Systematic Review. Different Proteins as Biomarkers for Sac Shrinkage After Endovascular Aortic Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Predictive Value of Preoperative Morphology Parameters in Patients Undergoing On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Sex Differences Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Technique. Females at a Clear Disadvantage with Postoperative Myocardial Infarction Symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1