An exploratory study of perceptions and utilization of genetic information in the intended parent experience of oocyte donor selection.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1007/s10815-024-03298-0
Carolyn Kalscheur, Iman Kashmola-Perez, Laura Rust, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Krista Redlinger-Grosse
{"title":"An exploratory study of perceptions and utilization of genetic information in the intended parent experience of oocyte donor selection.","authors":"Carolyn Kalscheur, Iman Kashmola-Perez, Laura Rust, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Krista Redlinger-Grosse","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03298-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Utilization of oocyte donation has become an increasingly common practice in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Since the introduction of larger carrier screening (CS) panels and extended family medical histories (EFMH), studies have not examined how this information factors into the oocyte donor selection process. This exploratory, qualitative study provides further insight into what role, if any, donors' available genetic information (e.g., larger CS panels and EFMH) plays in selecting an oocyte donor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online screening survey was distributed to individuals who have undergone or are currently in the process of selecting an oocyte donor through the RESOLVE network and Mayo Clinic's Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility clinic. From 13 survey respondents, six oocyte recipients subsequently participated in semi-structured telephone interviews and discussed their experiences as oocyte recipients including their perceptions of donors' available genetic information and process in choosing an oocyte donor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetic information was seen as valuable and reassuring for participants, particularly EFMH, but did not play a significant role in the selection process for these participants. Supplemental emergent themes provide context on the psychosocial complexities of the oocyte recipient experience and possible explanations for why genetic information is not a decisional priority. Participants indicated genetic information was not extensively discussed or fully explained by providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results demonstrate how genetic counselors can be more involved in the pre-selection process to discuss the utility and limitations of genetic information, as well as address psychosocial issues common to the oocyte recipient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03298-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Utilization of oocyte donation has become an increasingly common practice in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Since the introduction of larger carrier screening (CS) panels and extended family medical histories (EFMH), studies have not examined how this information factors into the oocyte donor selection process. This exploratory, qualitative study provides further insight into what role, if any, donors' available genetic information (e.g., larger CS panels and EFMH) plays in selecting an oocyte donor.

Methods: An online screening survey was distributed to individuals who have undergone or are currently in the process of selecting an oocyte donor through the RESOLVE network and Mayo Clinic's Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility clinic. From 13 survey respondents, six oocyte recipients subsequently participated in semi-structured telephone interviews and discussed their experiences as oocyte recipients including their perceptions of donors' available genetic information and process in choosing an oocyte donor.

Results: Genetic information was seen as valuable and reassuring for participants, particularly EFMH, but did not play a significant role in the selection process for these participants. Supplemental emergent themes provide context on the psychosocial complexities of the oocyte recipient experience and possible explanations for why genetic information is not a decisional priority. Participants indicated genetic information was not extensively discussed or fully explained by providers.

Conclusions: Results demonstrate how genetic counselors can be more involved in the pre-selection process to discuss the utility and limitations of genetic information, as well as address psychosocial issues common to the oocyte recipient experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于在选择卵细胞捐献者的过程中预期父母对遗传信息的认识和利用的探索性研究。
目的:在辅助生殖技术(ART)中,卵母细胞捐献的应用越来越普遍。自从引入更大规模的携带者筛查(CS)小组和扩大家族病史(EFMH)以来,还没有研究如何将这些信息纳入卵细胞捐献者的选择过程。这项探索性的定性研究进一步揭示了捐献者的可用遗传信息(如更大范围的携带者筛查和扩展家族病史)在选择卵细胞捐献者时的作用:通过 RESOLVE 网络和梅奥诊所的生殖内分泌与不孕症诊所,向已经或正在选择卵细胞捐献者的个人发放了一份在线筛选调查。在 13 位调查对象中,有 6 位卵细胞接受者随后参加了半结构化电话访谈,讨论了他们作为卵细胞接受者的经历,包括他们对捐献者现有遗传信息的看法和选择卵细胞捐献者的过程:结果:遗传信息对参与者(尤其是 EFMH)来说是有价值的,也是一种安慰,但在这些参与者的选择过程中并没有发挥重要作用。新出现的补充主题提供了卵细胞接受者经历的社会心理复杂性的背景,以及基因信息不是优先决定因素的可能原因。参与者表示,医疗服务提供者并未广泛讨论或充分解释遗传信息:结果表明,遗传咨询师可以更多地参与预选过程,讨论遗传信息的作用和局限性,并解决卵细胞接受者常见的社会心理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of Duostim protocol on pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients: A meta-analysis comparing single and double conventional stimulation cycles. Effect of zinc on sperm recovered by swim-up. The nexus between gamete donation and cryobiology in ARTs: Avoiding the unavoidable. Phenotypic impact of CFTR mutations on male reproductive tract agenesis in a Chinese cohort with congenital absence of the vas deferens. A novel homozygous mutation in the NLRP2 gene causes early embryonic arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1