Evolution and Adaptations of Robotic DIEP Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010790
Suat Morkuzu, K Can Bayezid, Berk B Ozmen, Seyma Fatima Eren, Souha Farhat, Alexandra L McLennan, Andrew J James, Dariush Nikkhah, Saïd C Azoury, Risal S Djohan, Sarah N Bishop, Graham S Schwarz
{"title":"Evolution and Adaptations of Robotic DIEP Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Suat Morkuzu, K Can Bayezid, Berk B Ozmen, Seyma Fatima Eren, Souha Farhat, Alexandra L McLennan, Andrew J James, Dariush Nikkhah, Saïd C Azoury, Risal S Djohan, Sarah N Bishop, Graham S Schwarz","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of robotic technology into surgical procedures has gained considerable attention for its promise to enhance a variety of clinical outcomes. Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest has emerged as a novel approach for autologous breast reconstruction. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current techniques, outcomes, and complications of robotic DIEP flap surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted after PRISMA 2020 guidelines across databases including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from 2000 to 2023. Articles exploring robotic DIEP flap harvest for breast reconstruction were assessed to compare operative techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. The risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies involving 108 patients were included. Three studies used a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique, whereas 11 studies used a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach. Preoperative planning utilized computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography imaging. The mean robotic operative time was 64 minutes, with total operative times averaging 574 minutes for TAPP and 497 minutes for TEP. The mean length of stay was 5 days, and the mean fascial incision length was 3 cm. Overall complication rate was 14.9%, with no significant difference compared with conventional DIEP flap procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic DIEP flap harvest is a promising technique that may reduce postoperative pain and limiting abdominal donor site morbidity. Potential limitations include longer operative times, variable hospital stays, and increased costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010790","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of robotic technology into surgical procedures has gained considerable attention for its promise to enhance a variety of clinical outcomes. Robotic deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest has emerged as a novel approach for autologous breast reconstruction. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current techniques, outcomes, and complications of robotic DIEP flap surgery.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted after PRISMA 2020 guidelines across databases including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from 2000 to 2023. Articles exploring robotic DIEP flap harvest for breast reconstruction were assessed to compare operative techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. The risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Results: Fourteen studies involving 108 patients were included. Three studies used a totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique, whereas 11 studies used a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach. Preoperative planning utilized computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography imaging. The mean robotic operative time was 64 minutes, with total operative times averaging 574 minutes for TAPP and 497 minutes for TEP. The mean length of stay was 5 days, and the mean fascial incision length was 3 cm. Overall complication rate was 14.9%, with no significant difference compared with conventional DIEP flap procedures.

Conclusion: Robotic DIEP flap harvest is a promising technique that may reduce postoperative pain and limiting abdominal donor site morbidity. Potential limitations include longer operative times, variable hospital stays, and increased costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人 DIEP 皮瓣手术的演变与适应性:系统回顾
背景:将机器人技术整合到外科手术中,因其有望提高各种临床效果而备受关注。机器人下腹穿孔器(DIEP)皮瓣采集已成为自体乳房重建的一种新方法。本系统性综述旨在全面概述目前机器人DIEP皮瓣手术的技术、效果和并发症:方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南,在2000年至2023年期间的PubMed、Embase、Google Scholar和Web of Science等数据库中进行了系统性文献检索。对探讨机器人DIEP皮瓣采集用于乳房重建的文章进行了评估,以比较手术技术、临床效果和并发症。采用ROBINS-I和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对偏倚风险进行评估:结果:共纳入 14 项研究,涉及 108 名患者。三项研究采用了完全腹膜外(TEP)技术,而 11 项研究采用了经腹腹膜前(TAPP)方法。术前规划采用了计算机断层扫描血管成像和磁共振血管成像。机器人手术的平均时间为64分钟,TAPP的总手术时间平均为574分钟,TEP的总手术时间平均为497分钟。平均住院时间为5天,平均筋膜切口长度为3厘米。总体并发症发生率为14.9%,与传统DIEP皮瓣手术相比无明显差异:结论:机器人DIEP皮瓣采集术是一种很有前景的技术,可减少术后疼痛,限制腹部供体部位的发病率。潜在的局限性包括手术时间较长、住院时间不固定以及费用增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Facial Fractures at the Armed Forces Capital Hospital of Korea: A 10-Year Study From 2013 to 2022. Lower Eyelid Surgical Anatomy and the Implications for Blepharoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Anatomic Studies in the Literature. FSTL1 Can Be a Promising Target in TMJ Osteoarthritis via Regulating Chondrocyte Mitophagy and Apoptosis. U-Shaped Osseous Release for Le Fort 1 Osteotomy: Potential Application to Superior Repositioning. Outcomes of Reconstructing Large Oncosurgical Defects of the Lateral Face in Older Cutaneous Cancer Patients Using Cervicofacial and Cervicothoracic Flaps.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1