Pattern of Prescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors: Evaluating Appropriateness and Factors Contributing to Their Adverse Effect Reaction Risk.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.3390/jcm13206187
Aymen A Alqurain, Mohammed F Alomar, Shatha Fakhreddin, Zahrah Julayh, Zahra Korikeesh, Samaher Al-Shaibi, Afnan Alshnbari, Alaa Al Helaili, Luma Ameer, Manal Surour, Sherihan Ghosn, Dania Hussein, Bader AlAlwan, Fadhel A Alomar, Keshore R Bidasee
{"title":"Pattern of Prescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors: Evaluating Appropriateness and Factors Contributing to Their Adverse Effect Reaction Risk.","authors":"Aymen A Alqurain, Mohammed F Alomar, Shatha Fakhreddin, Zahrah Julayh, Zahra Korikeesh, Samaher Al-Shaibi, Afnan Alshnbari, Alaa Al Helaili, Luma Ameer, Manal Surour, Sherihan Ghosn, Dania Hussein, Bader AlAlwan, Fadhel A Alomar, Keshore R Bidasee","doi":"10.3390/jcm13206187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are amongst the most commonly prescribed classes of medication. However, inappropriate PPI use can lead to several adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Limited data exist on factors contributing to the risk of ADRs associated with PPI prescribing patterns in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. This retrospective, cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence and the pattern of PPI use and to identify factors contributing to the risk of ADRs. <b>Methods</b>: Data were collected from electronic medical records of patients at Al-Qateef Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥40 years attending an outpatient medical care clinic. PPI prescribing patterns were categorized based on their dosage intensity into low-dose, medium-dose (MD), and high-dose (HD) categories. Binary and multinominal logistic regression models were used to determine the relationship between PPI prescribing patterns and use, categorized by MD or HD, and patient characteristics, adjusted for significant covariates. Results are presented as adjusted odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). <b>Results</b>: The study included 41,084 patients. The prevalence of PPI prescribing was 31%. PPI users were more frequently found to be females than males (52% vs. 50%, <i>p</i> = 0.013); they were also likely to be prescribed more medications (7 vs. 6, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but less likely to have gastritis-related diseases (34% vs. 32%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to non-users. PPI HD users were more likely male (56% vs. 43%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), older (53 vs. 52 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and prescribed more medications (11.8 vs. 2.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to MD users. PPI usage was associated with concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15). An increasing number of prescribed medications was associated with HD usage (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.12-1.14), but negatively associated with MD usage (OR = 0.7 95% CI 0.69-0.71). Female gender was negatively associated with HD usage (OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91). <b>Conclusions</b>: Our findings indicate that 31% of the included cohort were prescribed PPI. Inappropriate PPI prescribing related to the drug's omission is a concern as PPI non-users presented with valid indications such as gastritis. Male gender and increasing NPM were the common factors contributing to increased risk of PPI ADR. This study points to the importance of re-evaluating PPI use to ensure effective therapy with minimum risks of ADR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are amongst the most commonly prescribed classes of medication. However, inappropriate PPI use can lead to several adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Limited data exist on factors contributing to the risk of ADRs associated with PPI prescribing patterns in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. This retrospective, cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence and the pattern of PPI use and to identify factors contributing to the risk of ADRs. Methods: Data were collected from electronic medical records of patients at Al-Qateef Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥40 years attending an outpatient medical care clinic. PPI prescribing patterns were categorized based on their dosage intensity into low-dose, medium-dose (MD), and high-dose (HD) categories. Binary and multinominal logistic regression models were used to determine the relationship between PPI prescribing patterns and use, categorized by MD or HD, and patient characteristics, adjusted for significant covariates. Results are presented as adjusted odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: The study included 41,084 patients. The prevalence of PPI prescribing was 31%. PPI users were more frequently found to be females than males (52% vs. 50%, p = 0.013); they were also likely to be prescribed more medications (7 vs. 6, p < 0.001), but less likely to have gastritis-related diseases (34% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) compared to non-users. PPI HD users were more likely male (56% vs. 43%, p < 0.001), older (53 vs. 52 years, p < 0.001), and prescribed more medications (11.8 vs. 2.8, p < 0.001) compared to MD users. PPI usage was associated with concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15). An increasing number of prescribed medications was associated with HD usage (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.12-1.14), but negatively associated with MD usage (OR = 0.7 95% CI 0.69-0.71). Female gender was negatively associated with HD usage (OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that 31% of the included cohort were prescribed PPI. Inappropriate PPI prescribing related to the drug's omission is a concern as PPI non-users presented with valid indications such as gastritis. Male gender and increasing NPM were the common factors contributing to increased risk of PPI ADR. This study points to the importance of re-evaluating PPI use to ensure effective therapy with minimum risks of ADR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质子泵抑制剂的处方模式:评估质子泵抑制剂的适当性和导致其不良反应风险的因素。
背景/目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是最常用的处方药之一。然而,不当使用 PPI 可导致多种药物不良反应 (ADR)。关于沙特阿拉伯东部地区与 PPI 处方模式相关的 ADR 风险因素的数据十分有限。这项回顾性横断面研究旨在评估 PPI 的使用率和模式,并确定导致 ADR 风险的因素。研究方法从 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间 Al-Qateef 中心医院患者的电子病历中收集数据。纳入标准包括年龄≥40 岁的门诊病人。根据剂量强度将 PPI 处方模式分为低剂量、中等剂量 (MD) 和高剂量 (HD) 三类。使用二元和多项式逻辑回归模型来确定按 MD 或 HD 分类的 PPI 处方模式和使用情况与患者特征之间的关系,并对重要的协变量进行调整。结果以调整后的几率比(OR)和相应的 95% 置信区间(95% CI)表示。研究结果研究共纳入 41084 名患者。PPI处方率为31%。使用 PPI 的女性多于男性(52% 对 50%,P = 0.013);他们可能开出的处方药也更多(7 对 6,P < 0.001),但与未使用 PPI 的患者相比,患有胃炎相关疾病的可能性较小(34% 对 32%,P < 0.001)。与 MD 使用者相比,PPI HD 使用者更可能是男性(56% 对 43%,p < 0.001)、年龄更大(53 岁对 52 岁,p < 0.001),且处方药物更多(11.8 对 2.8,p < 0.001)。使用 PPI 与同时使用抗血小板药物有关(OR = 1.08,95% CI 1.01-1.15)。处方药数量的增加与使用 HD 相关(OR = 1.13,95% CI 1.12-1.14),但与使用 MD 负相关(OR = 0.7,95% CI 0.69-0.71)。女性性别与使用 HD 负相关(OR = 0.85,95% CI 0.79-0.91)。结论我们的研究结果表明,31%的研究对象服用了 PPI。由于未使用 PPI 的患者具有胃炎等有效适应症,因此与漏服药物有关的不适当 PPI 处方令人担忧。男性性别和非传染性疾病增加是导致 PPI ADR 风险增加的常见因素。这项研究表明,重新评估 PPI 的使用以确保有效治疗并将 ADR 风险降至最低非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy of Classic Versus Horizontal Incision Techniques in Skin-Reducing Mastectomy: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis. Adherence to Exercise in People with Lung or Head and Neck Cancer: Self-Reported Symptoms and Motivation During Cancer Treatment Need to Be Considered. Analyzing the Impact of Rehabilitation Utilizing Neurofunctional Exercises on the Functional Status of Stroke Patients. Approaches to Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review. Allograft Prosthetic Composite (APC) for Proximal Humeral Bone Deficiency in Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Technical Note and Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1