Viscoelastic Hemostatic Testing as a Diagnostic Tool for Hypercoagulability in Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.3390/jcm13206279
Khaled Ahmed Yassen, Dur I Shahwar, Aqeel Qasem Alrasasi, Feras Aldandan, Danah Sami Alali, Maryam Yousef Almuslem, Nouran Hassanein, Imtiyaz Khan, Klaus Görlinger
{"title":"Viscoelastic Hemostatic Testing as a Diagnostic Tool for Hypercoagulability in Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Khaled Ahmed Yassen, Dur I Shahwar, Aqeel Qasem Alrasasi, Feras Aldandan, Danah Sami Alali, Maryam Yousef Almuslem, Nouran Hassanein, Imtiyaz Khan, Klaus Görlinger","doi":"10.3390/jcm13206279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver transplantation is a complex surgical procedure in which various forms of coagulation dysfunction can occur, including perioperative hypercoagulability. The hemostasis balance in liver graft recipients with end-stage liver disease can shift to thrombosis or haemorrhage, depending on the associated risk factors and clinical conditions. Hypercoagulability can result in serious complications such as thromboembolism, which can affect the vessels of the newly transplanted liver graft. Standard coagulation tests (SCTs), such as prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), have a poor ability to diagnose and monitor an early stage of hypercoagulability. Recent studies demonstrated that viscoelastic hemostatic elastic tests (VETs), such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thromboelastography (TEG), are promising alternative tools for diagnosing hypercoagulability disorders. VETs measure clotting and clot formation time, clot strength (maximum clot firmness), fibrin and platelet contribution to clot firmness, and fibrinolysis, which makes them more sensitive in identifying liver graft recipients at risk for thrombosis as compared with SCTs. However, developing evidence-based guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of hypercoagulability based on VET results is still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508851/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liver transplantation is a complex surgical procedure in which various forms of coagulation dysfunction can occur, including perioperative hypercoagulability. The hemostasis balance in liver graft recipients with end-stage liver disease can shift to thrombosis or haemorrhage, depending on the associated risk factors and clinical conditions. Hypercoagulability can result in serious complications such as thromboembolism, which can affect the vessels of the newly transplanted liver graft. Standard coagulation tests (SCTs), such as prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), have a poor ability to diagnose and monitor an early stage of hypercoagulability. Recent studies demonstrated that viscoelastic hemostatic elastic tests (VETs), such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thromboelastography (TEG), are promising alternative tools for diagnosing hypercoagulability disorders. VETs measure clotting and clot formation time, clot strength (maximum clot firmness), fibrin and platelet contribution to clot firmness, and fibrinolysis, which makes them more sensitive in identifying liver graft recipients at risk for thrombosis as compared with SCTs. However, developing evidence-based guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of hypercoagulability based on VET results is still needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粘弹性止血测试作为肝移植高凝状态的诊断工具:叙述性综述。
肝移植是一种复杂的外科手术,可能会出现各种形式的凝血功能障碍,包括围手术期高凝状态。患有终末期肝病的肝移植受者的止血平衡可能会转向血栓形成或出血,这取决于相关的风险因素和临床条件。高凝状态可导致严重并发症,如血栓栓塞,影响新移植肝脏的血管。标准凝血检测(SCT),如凝血酶原时间和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT),诊断和监测早期高凝状态的能力较差。最近的研究表明,粘弹性止血弹性测试(VET),如旋转血栓弹力仪(ROTEM)和血栓弹力图(TEG),是诊断高凝状态的有前途的替代工具。血栓弹力图可测量凝血和血栓形成时间、血栓强度(最大血栓坚固度)、纤维蛋白和血小板对血栓坚固度的贡献以及纤维蛋白溶解,因此与SCT相比,血栓弹力图在识别有血栓风险的肝脏移植受者方面更为敏感。然而,根据 VET 结果制定预防和治疗高凝状态的循证指南仍有必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy of Classic Versus Horizontal Incision Techniques in Skin-Reducing Mastectomy: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis. Adherence to Exercise in People with Lung or Head and Neck Cancer: Self-Reported Symptoms and Motivation During Cancer Treatment Need to Be Considered. Analyzing the Impact of Rehabilitation Utilizing Neurofunctional Exercises on the Functional Status of Stroke Patients. Approaches to Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review. Allograft Prosthetic Composite (APC) for Proximal Humeral Bone Deficiency in Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Technical Note and Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1