Digital Flexible Ureteroscope: Evaluating Factors Responsible for Damage and Implementing a Mandatory Certification Program for Usage.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0208
Joao G Porto, Ansh Bhatia, Renil S Titus, Maria Camila Suarez Arbelaez, Mohamadhusni Zarli, Alejandra Guevara, Michael Tradewell, Diana M Lopategui, Ramgopal Satyanarayana, Robert Marcovich, Hemendra N Shah
{"title":"Digital Flexible Ureteroscope: Evaluating Factors Responsible for Damage and Implementing a Mandatory Certification Program for Usage.","authors":"Joao G Porto, Ansh Bhatia, Renil S Titus, Maria Camila Suarez Arbelaez, Mohamadhusni Zarli, Alejandra Guevara, Michael Tradewell, Diana M Lopategui, Ramgopal Satyanarayana, Robert Marcovich, Hemendra N Shah","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Digital flexible ureteroscopes (DFUs) play a crucial role in endourological procedures, and scope breakages are often avoidable with proper measures in place. We aimed to evaluate the effect of mandatory training on DFU durability and to assess the influence of various factors on instrument damage. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Mandatory training involving instructional videos on DFU care was introduced for all processing and operating room staff handling DFUs. Only certified personnel were allowed to handle DFUs, with meticulous usage documentation. The average annual usage of each DFU was compared pre and post program implementation. We examined factors such as patient demographics, procedure details, and operator experience impacting scope life using negative binomial regression. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The average usage of DFU increased by 21%, from 6.38 to 7.74 cases. We found that post-graduate year stood out as a significant predictive factor (estimate = 3.28, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Moreover, the streamlined model revealed that previous ureteral-stent use (estimate = 0.94, <i>p</i> < 0.001), struvite stones (estimate = 3.08, <i>p</i> = 0.01), and a higher number of stones (estimate = 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.04) were associated with an increased number of procedures before DFU breakage, whreas in situ lithotripsy in the lower calyx was associated with a reduced number of procedures before DFU breakage (estimate = -1.11, <i>p</i> = 0.003). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Implementing a mandatory training program showed an increase in DFU durability by 21%, suggesting a potential reduction in annual repair and replacement costs by the same percentage. Furthermore, outcomes were more favorable when experienced practitioners conducted treatments, especially in cases involving struvite stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"1372-1379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Digital flexible ureteroscopes (DFUs) play a crucial role in endourological procedures, and scope breakages are often avoidable with proper measures in place. We aimed to evaluate the effect of mandatory training on DFU durability and to assess the influence of various factors on instrument damage. Materials and Methods: Mandatory training involving instructional videos on DFU care was introduced for all processing and operating room staff handling DFUs. Only certified personnel were allowed to handle DFUs, with meticulous usage documentation. The average annual usage of each DFU was compared pre and post program implementation. We examined factors such as patient demographics, procedure details, and operator experience impacting scope life using negative binomial regression. Results: The average usage of DFU increased by 21%, from 6.38 to 7.74 cases. We found that post-graduate year stood out as a significant predictive factor (estimate = 3.28, p = 0.04). Moreover, the streamlined model revealed that previous ureteral-stent use (estimate = 0.94, p < 0.001), struvite stones (estimate = 3.08, p = 0.01), and a higher number of stones (estimate = 0.11, p = 0.04) were associated with an increased number of procedures before DFU breakage, whreas in situ lithotripsy in the lower calyx was associated with a reduced number of procedures before DFU breakage (estimate = -1.11, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Implementing a mandatory training program showed an increase in DFU durability by 21%, suggesting a potential reduction in annual repair and replacement costs by the same percentage. Furthermore, outcomes were more favorable when experienced practitioners conducted treatments, especially in cases involving struvite stones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字柔性输尿管镜:评估造成损坏的因素并实施强制性使用认证计划。
目的:数字柔性输尿管镜(DFU)在腔内造影术中起着至关重要的作用,如果措施得当,通常可以避免镜片破损。我们旨在评估强制性培训对 DFU 耐用性的影响,并评估各种因素对器械损坏的影响。材料和方法:对处理 DFU 的所有处理人员和手术室人员进行强制性培训,培训内容包括 DFU 护理教学视频。只有经过认证的人员才能处理 DFU,并对使用情况进行细致记录。我们比较了计划实施前后每个 DFU 的年平均使用量。我们使用负二项回归法研究了影响范围寿命的患者人口统计学、手术细节和操作者经验等因素。结果:DFU 的平均使用量增加了 21%,从 6.38 例增加到 7.74 例。我们发现研究生年级是一个重要的预测因素(估计值 = 3.28,P = 0.04)。此外,简化模型显示,曾使用输尿管支架(估计值 = 0.94,p < 0.001)、结石(估计值 = 3.08,p = 0.01)和结石数量较多(估计值 = 0.11,p = 0.04)与 DFU 破裂前手术次数增加有关,而下肾萼原位碎石与 DFU 破裂前手术次数减少有关(估计值 = -1.11,p = 0.003)。结论实施强制培训计划后,DFU 的耐用性提高了 21%,这表明每年的维修和更换费用也可能会相应减少。此外,由经验丰富的从业人员进行治疗,尤其是在涉及结石的病例中,效果更为理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: Caution in Interpreting Retrospective Data on Percutaneous Nephrostomy and Retrograde Ureteral Stenting for Obstructive Pyelonephritis. MRI Fusion Cryoablation: Is There an Outcome Difference Between Anterior and Posterior Lesions? Association Between Renal Pelvis Urine Density and the Risk of Infectious Complications after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Development of Patient-Specific Nomogram to Assist in Clinical Decision-Making for Single Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Report from the Single Port Advanced Robotic Consortium. Emerging Role of Laser Lithotripsy for Bladder Stones: Real-World Outcomes from Two European Endourology Centers with a Systematic Review of Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1