Comparison of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of end-stage patients with gastrointestinal cancers receiving conventional therapies with recipients of supportive-palliative care package.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-11 DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2032_23
Samira Vaziri, Kourosh Javdani Esfehani, Reza Hamidi, Hassan Amiri, Mobin Naghshbandi, Mahdi Rezai, Fatemeh Mohammadi
{"title":"Comparison of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of end-stage patients with gastrointestinal cancers receiving conventional therapies with recipients of supportive-palliative care package.","authors":"Samira Vaziri, Kourosh Javdani Esfehani, Reza Hamidi, Hassan Amiri, Mobin Naghshbandi, Mahdi Rezai, Fatemeh Mohammadi","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2032_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer after receiving palliative and supportive care.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Conducted at Firoozgar Hospital in Tehran, Iran, this observational study included 500 end-stage gastrointestinal cancer patients. The study divided these patients into two groups: 250 utilized palliative medicine services, while the remaining 250 did not. The study compared the conditions of patients in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those receiving palliative care, only 21% underwent chemotherapy, significantly lower than the 55% in the non-palliative care group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Hospital mortality rates were considerably reduced in the palliative care group, with 115 patients (46%) compared to 200 patients (80%) in the non-palliative group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The average hospital stay for patients receiving palliative care was 25.11 ± 5.12 days, significantly shorter than the 96.42 ± 14.15 days in the non-palliative group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire scores showed that patients in the palliative care group experienced significantly better outcomes in pain and mood symptoms, but no significant difference was observed in physical function compared to the non-palliative group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative medicine is recommended for gastrointestinal cancer patients as it can significantly reduce unnecessary hospital referrals and length of hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2032_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer after receiving palliative and supportive care.

Materials and methods: Conducted at Firoozgar Hospital in Tehran, Iran, this observational study included 500 end-stage gastrointestinal cancer patients. The study divided these patients into two groups: 250 utilized palliative medicine services, while the remaining 250 did not. The study compared the conditions of patients in both groups.

Results: Among those receiving palliative care, only 21% underwent chemotherapy, significantly lower than the 55% in the non-palliative care group (P < 0.001). Hospital mortality rates were considerably reduced in the palliative care group, with 115 patients (46%) compared to 200 patients (80%) in the non-palliative group (P < 0.001). The average hospital stay for patients receiving palliative care was 25.11 ± 5.12 days, significantly shorter than the 96.42 ± 14.15 days in the non-palliative group (P < 0.001). The EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire scores showed that patients in the palliative care group experienced significantly better outcomes in pain and mood symptoms, but no significant difference was observed in physical function compared to the non-palliative group.

Conclusion: Palliative medicine is recommended for gastrointestinal cancer patients as it can significantly reduce unnecessary hospital referrals and length of hospitalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较接受传统疗法和支持性姑息治疗套餐的胃肠道癌症晚期患者的质量调整生命年(QALYs)。
研究目的本研究旨在比较胃肠道癌症患者在接受姑息治疗和支持治疗后的质量调整生命年(QALYs):这项观察性研究在伊朗德黑兰的 Firoozgar 医院进行,包括 500 名终末期胃肠道癌症患者。研究将这些患者分为两组:250 人使用了姑息治疗服务,其余 250 人未使用。研究比较了两组患者的病情:在接受姑息治疗的患者中,只有 21% 接受了化疗,明显低于非姑息治疗组的 55%(P < 0.001)。姑息治疗组的住院死亡率大大降低,为115人(46%),而非姑息治疗组为200人(80%)(P < 0.001)。接受姑息治疗的患者平均住院时间为(25.11 ± 5.12)天,明显短于非姑息治疗组(96.42 ± 14.15)天(P < 0.001)。根据EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L)调查问卷的评分结果显示,姑息治疗组患者在疼痛和情绪症状方面的疗效明显优于非姑息治疗组,但在身体功能方面与非姑息治疗组相比无明显差异:结论:建议对胃肠道癌症患者采取姑息治疗,因为它可以大大减少不必要的转院和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Am I really fat/thin?!" Self-perceived body image and correlation with nutritional status among medical students in Central Gujarat. A clinical comparative study on carbamylated haemoglobin as a surrogate marker to differentiate acute kidney injury from chronic kidney disease. A clinical study of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Maharashtra. A community-based study on health seeking behaviour among NCD patients in rural and urban Tamil Nadu - A convergent mixed method study. A cross-sectional survey of ocular problems after COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers at a teaching hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1