Do adolescents with hearing loss use social media and the internet differently from their hearing peers?

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Laryngology and Otology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1017/S002221512400149X
Deniz Tuz, Busra Altın, Merve Ozbal Batuk
{"title":"Do adolescents with hearing loss use social media and the internet differently from their hearing peers?","authors":"Deniz Tuz, Busra Altın, Merve Ozbal Batuk","doi":"10.1017/S002221512400149X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the internet and social media use of teenagers with hearing loss with that of their normal hearing peers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 27 hearing-impaired and 27 normal-hearing peers (12-18 years). The Social Media Attitude Scale, the Internet Use Purposes Scale, University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale and the Problematic Internet Use Scale were used to compare hearing-loss and normal-hearing groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The social isolation subscale and Social Media Attitude Scale total score differed between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.048, respectively). Internet Use Purposes Scale education subscale differences were statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.042). Negative consequences (<i>p</i> = 0.007), excessive use (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and Problematic Internet Use Scale total score (<i>p</i> = 0.005) differed significantly. The University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale had a moderate negative connection with the Problematic Internet Use Scale's social benefit/comfort subscale and total score (<i>r</i> = 0.369, <i>p</i> = 0.006 and <i>r</i> = -0.309, <i>p</i> = 0.023, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While adolescents with hearing loss have limited online educational resources, problematic internet use is a concern. When overused, the internet can reduce loneliness, but it can also have harmful consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":16293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","volume":" ","pages":"217-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002221512400149X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the internet and social media use of teenagers with hearing loss with that of their normal hearing peers.

Methods: The study included 27 hearing-impaired and 27 normal-hearing peers (12-18 years). The Social Media Attitude Scale, the Internet Use Purposes Scale, University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale and the Problematic Internet Use Scale were used to compare hearing-loss and normal-hearing groups.

Results: The social isolation subscale and Social Media Attitude Scale total score differed between groups (p = 0.001 and p = 0.048, respectively). Internet Use Purposes Scale education subscale differences were statistically significant (p = 0.042). Negative consequences (p = 0.007), excessive use (p = 0.021) and Problematic Internet Use Scale total score (p = 0.005) differed significantly. The University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale had a moderate negative connection with the Problematic Internet Use Scale's social benefit/comfort subscale and total score (r = 0.369, p = 0.006 and r = -0.309, p = 0.023, respectively).

Conclusion: While adolescents with hearing loss have limited online educational resources, problematic internet use is a concern. When overused, the internet can reduce loneliness, but it can also have harmful consequences.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有听力损失的青少年在使用社交媒体和互联网时是否与听力正常的同龄人有所不同?
目的:本研究的目的是比较听力损失青少年与听力正常同龄人的互联网和社交媒体使用情况。方法:选取听力受损者27例,正常听力者27例,年龄12 ~ 18岁。使用社交媒体态度量表、网络使用目的量表、加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表和问题网络使用量表对听力损失组和听力正常组进行比较。结果:社交隔离子量表和社交媒体态度量表总分组间差异显著(p = 0.001和p = 0.048)。互联网使用目的量表教育子量表差异有统计学意义(p = 0.042)。不良后果(p = 0.007)、过度使用(p = 0.021)和问题网络使用量表总分(p = 0.005)差异显著。加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表与问题网络使用量表的社会效益/舒适子量表和总分呈中度负相关(r = 0.369, p = 0.006和r = -0.309, p = 0.023)。结论:虽然听力损失青少年的在线教育资源有限,但有问题的互联网使用是一个问题。如果过度使用,互联网可以减少孤独感,但它也会产生有害的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laryngology and Otology
Journal of Laryngology and Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
593
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (JLO) is a leading, monthly journal containing original scientific articles and clinical records in otology, rhinology, laryngology and related specialties. Founded in 1887, JLO is absorbing reading for ENT specialists and trainees. The journal has an international outlook with contributions from around the world, relevant to all specialists in this area regardless of the country in which they practise. JLO contains main articles (original, review and historical), case reports and short reports as well as radiology, pathology or oncology in focus, a selection of abstracts, book reviews, letters to the editor, general notes and calendar, operative surgery techniques, and occasional supplements. It is fully illustrated and has become a definitive reference source in this fast-moving subject area. Published monthly an annual subscription is excellent value for money. Included in the subscription is access to the JLO interactive web site with searchable abstract database of the journal archive back to 1887.
期刊最新文献
Otitis externa: what is the problem with getting it right? A mixed-methods study in primary and secondary care - ERRATUM. Efficacy of Diced Cartilage With or Without Platelet-Rich Fibrin in an Animal Nasal Septal Perforation Model. Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes Do Not Predict Survival in Human Papillomavirus Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single Institution Retrospective Review. Low accuracy of 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in identification of the bony defect in patients with superior semi-circular canal dehiscence syndrome: case-control study - ERRATUM. Surgical closure of nasal septal perforation using mucosal flaps and interposed graft: a case series of 154 patients and literature review - ERRATUM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1