A Retrospective Closed Cohort Study on Distribution of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and its Impact on Patient Outcome.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1177/08850666241290468
Tushar Mantri, Jyoti Burad, Safiya Al Hashmi, Said Salim Abood Al Jaadi, Badriya Aladawi, Wijdan Abdullah Said Balushi
{"title":"A Retrospective Closed Cohort Study on Distribution of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and its Impact on Patient Outcome.","authors":"Tushar Mantri, Jyoti Burad, Safiya Al Hashmi, Said Salim Abood Al Jaadi, Badriya Aladawi, Wijdan Abdullah Said Balushi","doi":"10.1177/08850666241290468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and serious nosocomial infection affecting critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. This study investigated the prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms in VAP, the VAP rate, and the outcomes associated with MDR-VAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study, conducted in 2022, included adult ICU cases from April 2021 to March 2022, receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h. Patient data were analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, empirical antibiotic use, and outcomes. MDR organisms were identified in respiratory cultures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 447 patients, 133 developed VAP, with 96 cases being MDR-VAP. The mean age of the overall VAP population was 52 years, 70% of which were males. The incidence of VAP was 30.0% (95% CI: 25.7%-34.5%), while that of MDR-VAP was 21.6% (95% CI: 17.9%-25.8%). The most prevalent MDR organisms were Acinetobacter species (50%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (46.9%). Empirical antibiotics were administered in 96% of VAP cases. The overall VAP rate was 38.03/1000 ventilator days. No single antimicrobial agent seemed to offer an empirical cover, as the susceptibility rate for most tested antimicrobials was less than 85%. Patients with MDR-VAP had a low survival rate (64.6%) and were less likely to be extubated at 13.5% compared to non-MDR-VAP (survival rate of 62.2%). COVID-19 patients had a high incidence of MDR VAP, especially with Acinetobacter. Overall, VAP mortality was 57.1%. The median ventilator days were 16 for VAP and only four for non-VAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gram-negative organisms, particularly Klebsiella and Acinetobacter, were the main MDR VAP culprits. MDR-VAP exhibited higher morbidity and mortality. A study focused on developing resistance by microorganisms is warranted for further understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241290468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and serious nosocomial infection affecting critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. This study investigated the prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms in VAP, the VAP rate, and the outcomes associated with MDR-VAP.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study, conducted in 2022, included adult ICU cases from April 2021 to March 2022, receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h. Patient data were analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, empirical antibiotic use, and outcomes. MDR organisms were identified in respiratory cultures.

Results: Among 447 patients, 133 developed VAP, with 96 cases being MDR-VAP. The mean age of the overall VAP population was 52 years, 70% of which were males. The incidence of VAP was 30.0% (95% CI: 25.7%-34.5%), while that of MDR-VAP was 21.6% (95% CI: 17.9%-25.8%). The most prevalent MDR organisms were Acinetobacter species (50%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (46.9%). Empirical antibiotics were administered in 96% of VAP cases. The overall VAP rate was 38.03/1000 ventilator days. No single antimicrobial agent seemed to offer an empirical cover, as the susceptibility rate for most tested antimicrobials was less than 85%. Patients with MDR-VAP had a low survival rate (64.6%) and were less likely to be extubated at 13.5% compared to non-MDR-VAP (survival rate of 62.2%). COVID-19 patients had a high incidence of MDR VAP, especially with Acinetobacter. Overall, VAP mortality was 57.1%. The median ventilator days were 16 for VAP and only four for non-VAP.

Conclusion: Gram-negative organisms, particularly Klebsiella and Acinetobacter, were the main MDR VAP culprits. MDR-VAP exhibited higher morbidity and mortality. A study focused on developing resistance by microorganisms is warranted for further understanding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于呼吸机相关肺炎耐多药细菌分布及其对患者预后影响的回顾性封闭队列研究
目的:呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)是影响接受机械通气的重症患者的一种常见且严重的院内感染。本研究调查了耐多药(MDR)菌在 VAP 中的流行率、VAP 发生率以及与 MDR-VAP 相关的结果:这项回顾性单中心研究于 2022 年开展,纳入了 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月期间接受机械通气超过 48 小时的成人 ICU 病例。研究分析了患者的人口统计学特征、并发症、经验性抗生素使用情况和结果。在呼吸道培养物中发现了 MDR 微生物:结果:在 447 名患者中,133 人出现 VAP,其中 96 例为 MDR-VAP。VAP 患者的平均年龄为 52 岁,其中 70% 为男性。VAP 的发病率为 30.0%(95% CI:25.7%-34.5%),而 MDR-VAP 的发病率为 21.6%(95% CI:17.9%-25.8%)。最常见的 MDR 微生物是醋杆菌(50%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(46.9%)。96%的 VAP 病例使用了经验性抗生素。VAP 总发生率为每千个呼吸机日 38.03 例。没有一种抗菌药物似乎能提供经验性保护,因为大多数测试抗菌药物的药敏率低于 85%。与非 MDR-VAP 患者(存活率为 62.2%)相比,MDR-VAP 患者的存活率较低(64.6%),拔管率为 13.5%。COVID-19 患者的 MDR VAP 发生率很高,尤其是感染醋酸嗜多菌的患者。总体而言,VAP 死亡率为 57.1%。VAP患者的中位呼吸机天数为16天,而非VAP患者的中位呼吸机天数仅为4天:结论:革兰氏阴性菌,尤其是克雷伯氏菌和不动杆菌,是引起 MDR VAP 的罪魁祸首。MDR-VAP表现出更高的发病率和死亡率。有必要对微生物产生耐药性的情况进行重点研究,以进一步了解情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
Adult Code Sepsis: A Narrative Review of its Implementation and Impact. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies to Severe Hyponatremia in the Intensive Care Unit. Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Blood RNA Biomarkers Identify Bacterial and Biofilm Coinfections in COVID-19 Intensive Care Patients. Vitamin K Prescribing Trends Among Critically Ill Children Hospitalized for Sepsis: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1