Automated coordinate system estimation: A preliminary step toward computer-assisted radial head arthroplasty planning.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1002/jor.25996
Ausberto Velasquez Garcia, Jennifer M Oettinger, Adam J Wentworth, Hiroki Nishikawa, Grace K Chaney, James S Fitzsimmons, Jonathan M Morris, Shawn W O'Driscoll
{"title":"Automated coordinate system estimation: A preliminary step toward computer-assisted radial head arthroplasty planning.","authors":"Ausberto Velasquez Garcia, Jennifer M Oettinger, Adam J Wentworth, Hiroki Nishikawa, Grace K Chaney, James S Fitzsimmons, Jonathan M Morris, Shawn W O'Driscoll","doi":"10.1002/jor.25996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The success of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) relies on the design of the implant and precision of the surgical technique, with preoperative planning potentially playing a crucial role. The accurate establishment of a patient-specific anatomical coordinate system (ACS) is essential for this planning process. This study tested the hypothesis that an innovative automated method would be an accurate, reliable, and efficient framework to determine the ACS of the proximal radius, which would be a step toward improving the precision of RHA planning. We used advanced computational techniques to analyze 50 forearm CT scans, comparing the accuracy, reproducibility, reliability, and efficiency of the automated method with manually derived ACS using expert observers as benchmarks. The results showed that the automated approach was more accurate in identifying anatomical landmarks, with smaller mean distance discrepancies (0.6 mm) than manual observers (1 mm). Its reproducibility was also superior, with narrower reproducibility limits, particularly for ulnar notch landmarks (0.6 to 0.8 mm compared to manual selection 1.2 to 1.4 mm) (p = .01). In addition, the limits of agreement and the mean absolute rotational and translational differences of the axes were narrower for the automated method, which also reduced the construction time to an average of 46 s compared to 150 s manually (p < .001). These findings suggest that the automated method has the potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of preoperative and postoperative computer-assisted procedures for RHA. Further research is needed to fully understand the utility of this automated system for enhancing RHA computer-assisted surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The success of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) relies on the design of the implant and precision of the surgical technique, with preoperative planning potentially playing a crucial role. The accurate establishment of a patient-specific anatomical coordinate system (ACS) is essential for this planning process. This study tested the hypothesis that an innovative automated method would be an accurate, reliable, and efficient framework to determine the ACS of the proximal radius, which would be a step toward improving the precision of RHA planning. We used advanced computational techniques to analyze 50 forearm CT scans, comparing the accuracy, reproducibility, reliability, and efficiency of the automated method with manually derived ACS using expert observers as benchmarks. The results showed that the automated approach was more accurate in identifying anatomical landmarks, with smaller mean distance discrepancies (0.6 mm) than manual observers (1 mm). Its reproducibility was also superior, with narrower reproducibility limits, particularly for ulnar notch landmarks (0.6 to 0.8 mm compared to manual selection 1.2 to 1.4 mm) (p = .01). In addition, the limits of agreement and the mean absolute rotational and translational differences of the axes were narrower for the automated method, which also reduced the construction time to an average of 46 s compared to 150 s manually (p < .001). These findings suggest that the automated method has the potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of preoperative and postoperative computer-assisted procedures for RHA. Further research is needed to fully understand the utility of this automated system for enhancing RHA computer-assisted surgical planning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动坐标系估算:计算机辅助桡骨头关节成形术规划的第一步。
桡骨头关节置换术(RHA)的成功取决于植入物的设计和手术技术的精确性,而术前规划可能起到至关重要的作用。准确建立患者特异性解剖坐标系(ACS)对这一规划过程至关重要。本研究测试了一种假设,即一种创新的自动化方法将是确定桡骨近端 ACS 的准确、可靠和高效的框架,这将是提高 RHA 规划精确度的一步。我们使用先进的计算技术分析了 50 张前臂 CT 扫描图像,比较了自动方法与以专家观察者为基准手动得出的 ACS 的准确性、再现性、可靠性和效率。结果表明,自动方法在识别解剖地标方面更加准确,平均距离差异(0.6 毫米)小于人工观察者(1 毫米)。其重现性也更优越,重现极限更窄,尤其是尺骨切迹地标(0.6 至 0.8 毫米,而人工选择为 1.2 至 1.4 毫米)(p = .01)。此外,自动方法的一致性限值以及轴的旋转和平移绝对差值的平均值也更小,而且与手动方法的 150 秒相比,自动方法还将构建时间缩短至平均 46 秒(p = 0.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Synovial fluid dual-biomarker algorithm accurately differentiates osteoarthritis from inflammatory arthritis. Correction to "Optical Spectroscopic Determination of Human Meniscus Composition". Bilateral waveform analysis of gait biomechanics presurgery to 12 months following ACL reconstruction compared to controls. Issue Information - Cover Issue Information - Editorial Board and TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1