Perspectives on managing patients with Down's syndrome among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia: A vignette and a COM-B analysis study.

Q2 Dentistry Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_14_24
Hassan Abed, Waleed Taju
{"title":"Perspectives on managing patients with Down's syndrome among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia: A vignette and a COM-B analysis study.","authors":"Hassan Abed, Waleed Taju","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_14_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore perspectives on managing patients with Down's syndrome among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia using a vignette study and COM-B model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study for orthodontists working in Saudi Arabia. Participants were asked about their demographic data. Vignette (clinical scenarios) and COM-B model (C: capability, O: opportunity, M: motivation, and B: behavior) were used to assess orthodontists' perspectives regarding the management of patients with Down's syndrome. A model of Alpha (Cronbach) was used to study the properties of measurement scales. A Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to correlate variables represented by means. An independent <i>t</i>-test and one-way ANOVA, with least significant difference (LSD) as a <i>post hoc</i> test, were used to compare two group means and more than two groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (n = 70, 85.4%) reported that they had no training/exposure to dealing with Down's syndrome patients during their orthodontic clinical training. Participants reported an average of 3.82 (SD = 1.1) when treating moderate Down's syndrome and 2.48 (SD = 1.4) when treating severe Down's syndrome with mild occlusion discrepancies. Participants also showed that their behavior and attitude are significantly related to their capability, opportunity, and motivation regarding the management of patients with Down's syndrome. The average reported agreement ranges from 2.46 (SD = 1) for the hypoplasia of the mandible to 4.38 (SD = 0.8) for the congenitally missing teeth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that orthodontists in Saudi Arabia showed low confidence levels to manage Down's syndrome patients with moderate and severe challenging behavior. Despite this, the likelihood of increasing their confidence levels and attitude regarding the management of patients with Down's syndrome increased by increasing their capability, opportunity, motivation, and knowledge in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_14_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to explore perspectives on managing patients with Down's syndrome among orthodontists in Saudi Arabia using a vignette study and COM-B model.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study for orthodontists working in Saudi Arabia. Participants were asked about their demographic data. Vignette (clinical scenarios) and COM-B model (C: capability, O: opportunity, M: motivation, and B: behavior) were used to assess orthodontists' perspectives regarding the management of patients with Down's syndrome. A model of Alpha (Cronbach) was used to study the properties of measurement scales. A Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to correlate variables represented by means. An independent t-test and one-way ANOVA, with least significant difference (LSD) as a post hoc test, were used to compare two group means and more than two groups, respectively.

Results: Most participants (n = 70, 85.4%) reported that they had no training/exposure to dealing with Down's syndrome patients during their orthodontic clinical training. Participants reported an average of 3.82 (SD = 1.1) when treating moderate Down's syndrome and 2.48 (SD = 1.4) when treating severe Down's syndrome with mild occlusion discrepancies. Participants also showed that their behavior and attitude are significantly related to their capability, opportunity, and motivation regarding the management of patients with Down's syndrome. The average reported agreement ranges from 2.46 (SD = 1) for the hypoplasia of the mandible to 4.38 (SD = 0.8) for the congenitally missing teeth.

Conclusion: This study found that orthodontists in Saudi Arabia showed low confidence levels to manage Down's syndrome patients with moderate and severe challenging behavior. Despite this, the likelihood of increasing their confidence levels and attitude regarding the management of patients with Down's syndrome increased by increasing their capability, opportunity, motivation, and knowledge in this field.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯正畸医生管理唐氏综合征患者的视角:小故事和 COM-B 分析研究。
目的本研究旨在通过小故事研究和 COM-B 模型,探讨沙特阿拉伯正畸医生对管理唐氏综合征患者的看法:这是一项针对在沙特阿拉伯工作的正畸医生的横断面研究。研究人员询问了参与者的人口统计学数据。小故事(临床情景)和 COM-B 模型(C:能力;O:机会;M:动机;B:行为)用于评估正畸医生对唐氏综合征患者管理的看法。阿尔法(克朗巴赫)模型用于研究测量量表的特性。采用皮尔逊相关系数对以均值表示的变量进行相关性分析。在比较两组平均值和两组以上平均值时,分别采用了独立 t 检验和单因素方差分析,并以最小显著性差异(LSD)作为事后检验:大多数参与者(n = 70,85.4%)表示,他们在接受口腔正畸临床培训期间没有接受过处理唐氏综合征患者的培训/接触。在治疗中度唐氏综合征患者时,参与者的平均治疗量为 3.82(SD = 1.1);在治疗重度唐氏综合征和轻度咬合不齐患者时,参与者的平均治疗量为 2.48(SD = 1.4)。受试者还表明,他们的行为和态度与他们管理唐氏综合征患者的能力、机会和动机有很大关系。对于下颌骨发育不全,报告的平均同意率为 2.46(SD = 1);对于先天性缺失牙,报告的平均同意率为 4.38(SD = 0.8):本研究发现,沙特阿拉伯的正畸医生对管理具有中度和重度挑战行为的唐氏综合征患者信心不足。尽管如此,通过增强他们在这一领域的能力、机会、动力和知识,提高他们管理唐氏综合征患者的信心水平和态度的可能性还是很大的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Differences of enamel surface after bracket debonding and adhesive removal with tungsten carbide, steel bur, and adhesive removing plier. Evaluation of antibacterial efficacy and surface roughness of orthodontic brackets coated with silver-copper hybrid or zinc oxide nanoparticles: An in-vitro study. Facial soft tissue changes following maxillary skeletal expansion and protraction in growing patients with class III malocclusion: A randomized clinical trial. Nanoparticle-based oral rinse in prevention of white spot lesions in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Obstructive sleep apnea risk and predictors among children in Boston and Lebanon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1