Three-dimensional-printed guide plate for direct percutaneous pedicle screw implantation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 162 patients.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05135-7
Xin-Cheng Fan, Da-Wang Zhao, Yi-Xiang Zhao, Feng Liu, Lei Cheng
{"title":"Three-dimensional-printed guide plate for direct percutaneous pedicle screw implantation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 162 patients.","authors":"Xin-Cheng Fan, Da-Wang Zhao, Yi-Xiang Zhao, Feng Liu, Lei Cheng","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05135-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of three-dimensional (3D)-printed guide plate-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 162 patients who underwent MIS-TLIF at Tai'an City Central Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The studied variables included operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, postoperative drainage volume, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability Index (ODI) score (preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery), and intervertebral fusion rate at 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conventional group included 99 patients who underwent a conventional procedure, while the 3D printing group included 63 patients who underwent 3D-printed guide plate-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation. The conventional group required more times of positioning needle punctures than the 3D printing group (22.2 ± 5.9 vs. 16.1 ± 4.9). The operation and fluoroscopy time were also longer in the former group (183.5 ± 51.1 min vs. 148.8 ± 40.3 min and 30.2 ± 5.9 s vs. 24.1 ± 4.9 s, respectively). In 3D printing group, lower back pain VAS scores and ODI scores at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery were observed. There were no significant differences in terms of the volumes of intraoperative blood loss; postoperative lower limb pain VAS scores; and interbody fusion rate (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel 3D-printed guide plate-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation can achieve better amelioration of back pain and recovery of function. It also reduced the times of positioning needle puncture and fluoroscopy time during percutaneous screw placement surgery and reduced the duration of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05135-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the impact of three-dimensional (3D)-printed guide plate-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery.

Methods: Overall, 162 patients who underwent MIS-TLIF at Tai'an City Central Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The studied variables included operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy time, postoperative drainage volume, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability Index (ODI) score (preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery), and intervertebral fusion rate at 6 months after surgery.

Results: The conventional group included 99 patients who underwent a conventional procedure, while the 3D printing group included 63 patients who underwent 3D-printed guide plate-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation. The conventional group required more times of positioning needle punctures than the 3D printing group (22.2 ± 5.9 vs. 16.1 ± 4.9). The operation and fluoroscopy time were also longer in the former group (183.5 ± 51.1 min vs. 148.8 ± 40.3 min and 30.2 ± 5.9 s vs. 24.1 ± 4.9 s, respectively). In 3D printing group, lower back pain VAS scores and ODI scores at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery were observed. There were no significant differences in terms of the volumes of intraoperative blood loss; postoperative lower limb pain VAS scores; and interbody fusion rate (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The novel 3D-printed guide plate-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw implantation can achieve better amelioration of back pain and recovery of function. It also reduced the times of positioning needle puncture and fluoroscopy time during percutaneous screw placement surgery and reduced the duration of surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创经椎间孔腰椎融合手术中直接经皮椎弓根螺钉植入的三维打印导板:对162例患者的回顾性研究。
背景:本研究旨在探讨三维(3D)打印导板辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉植入术对微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术(MIS-TLIF)的影响:方法:对泰安市中心医院162例接受MIS-TLIF手术的患者进行回顾性研究。研究变量包括手术时间、术中失血量、透视时间、术后引流量、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分(术前、术后2周、3个月、6个月和12个月)以及术后6个月的椎间融合率:传统组包括99名接受传统手术的患者,而3D打印组包括63名接受3D打印导板辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉植入术的患者。传统组所需的定位针穿刺次数(22.2 ± 5.9 对 16.1 ± 4.9)多于 3D 打印组。前者的手术时间和透视时间也更长(分别为 183.5 ± 51.1 分钟对 148.8 ± 40.3 分钟和 30.2 ± 5.9 秒对 24.1 ± 4.9 秒)。在 3D 打印组中,术后 2 周和 3 个月的下背痛 VAS 评分和 ODI 评分均有观察。术中失血量、术后下肢疼痛VAS评分和椎间融合率无明显差异(P>0.05):结论:新型三维打印导板辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉植入术能更好地改善背部疼痛并恢复功能。结论:新型三维打印导板辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉植入术能更好地改善背痛和恢复功能,还能减少经皮螺钉植入手术中的定位针穿刺时间和透视时间,缩短手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Learning curve for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clinical and mechanical outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of 163,516 patients. Effect of reduced orbital rotation on image quality and intra-articular screw detection in intraoperative 3D imaging of proximal humerus plate fixation: a cadaveric study. MEX3B aggravates osteoarthritis progression by post-transcriptionally activating TLR4-NF-κB signaling axis. Comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes in men and women following total hip replacement surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1