Molecular Tumor Testing on Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Specimens in a Large Community-Based Healthcare System.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.2074
David H Kruchko, Sareena Ali, Mahbubul Hasan, Madeline Sesselmann, Imad Almanaseer, Eli D Ehrenpreis
{"title":"Molecular Tumor Testing on Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Specimens in a Large Community-Based Healthcare System.","authors":"David H Kruchko, Sareena Ali, Mahbubul Hasan, Madeline Sesselmann, Imad Almanaseer, Eli D Ehrenpreis","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to describe the adherence of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines to perform genetic screening for all colorectal cancer (CRC) specimens with molecular tumor testing, eg, immunohistochemical (IHC) testing, in a large community-based healthcare setting. The study also identified trends involving characteristics of CRC, individual reporting physician, and physician location and examined the potential impact of these trends on the performance of molecular tumor testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, multi-center study using a centralized pathology database to assess molecular testing on CRC specimens. The primary endpoint was whether tumor testing of a CRC specimen was performed. Secondary endpoints included tumor location within the colon (ie, the right or left side), year of CRC diagnosis, and location of the pathologist within the Advocate Aurora Health (AAH) system. The data were collected from 2016 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2469 CRC cases, reviewed by 47 pathologists practicing in five separate hospitals, were identified within the AAH system for the selected five-year time period. IHC testing was performed in 1666 of these specimens (67.5%). There was no statistical difference between CRC sidedness and IHC testing performed (p = 0.9). There were no discernible features or trends for the ordering of IHC testing among different pathologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Molecular tumor testing for CRC specimens in this large community-based healthcare setting was inconsistent and below the ideal adherence rate of 100%. Secondary findings offered neither explanation nor trends in likelihood to send samples for IHC testing. Education would be beneficial for pathologists and all physicians who care for patients with CRC in community-based health care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"11 3","pages":"215-221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the adherence of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines to perform genetic screening for all colorectal cancer (CRC) specimens with molecular tumor testing, eg, immunohistochemical (IHC) testing, in a large community-based healthcare setting. The study also identified trends involving characteristics of CRC, individual reporting physician, and physician location and examined the potential impact of these trends on the performance of molecular tumor testing.

Methods: This was a retrospective, multi-center study using a centralized pathology database to assess molecular testing on CRC specimens. The primary endpoint was whether tumor testing of a CRC specimen was performed. Secondary endpoints included tumor location within the colon (ie, the right or left side), year of CRC diagnosis, and location of the pathologist within the Advocate Aurora Health (AAH) system. The data were collected from 2016 to 2020.

Results: A total of 2469 CRC cases, reviewed by 47 pathologists practicing in five separate hospitals, were identified within the AAH system for the selected five-year time period. IHC testing was performed in 1666 of these specimens (67.5%). There was no statistical difference between CRC sidedness and IHC testing performed (p = 0.9). There were no discernible features or trends for the ordering of IHC testing among different pathologists.

Conclusions: Molecular tumor testing for CRC specimens in this large community-based healthcare setting was inconsistent and below the ideal adherence rate of 100%. Secondary findings offered neither explanation nor trends in likelihood to send samples for IHC testing. Education would be beneficial for pathologists and all physicians who care for patients with CRC in community-based health care settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型社区医疗系统中的结直肠腺癌标本分子肿瘤检测。
目的:本研究旨在描述美国国家综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network)指南在大型社区医疗机构对所有结直肠癌(CRC)标本进行分子肿瘤检测(如免疫组化(IHC)检测)基因筛查时的遵守情况。该研究还确定了涉及 CRC 特征、报告医生个人和医生所在地的趋势,并研究了这些趋势对分子肿瘤检测性能的潜在影响:这是一项回顾性多中心研究,使用集中病理数据库评估 CRC 标本的分子检测。主要终点是是否对 CRC 标本进行了肿瘤检测。次要终点包括结肠内的肿瘤位置(即右侧或左侧)、CRC 诊断年份以及病理学家在 Advocate Aurora Health(AAH)系统中的位置。数据收集时间为2016年至2020年:在所选的五年时间内,AAH 系统内共确定了 2469 例 CRC 病例,分别由五家医院的 47 位病理学家进行了审查。其中1666份标本(67.5%)进行了IHC检测。CRC片面性与所进行的IHC检测之间没有统计学差异(P = 0.9)。不同病理学家的 IHC 检测订单没有明显的特征或趋势:结论:在这一大型社区医疗机构中,对 CRC 标本进行肿瘤分子检测的情况并不一致,也未达到 100% 的理想依从率。次要研究结果既没有解释送检样本进行 IHC 检测的可能性,也没有提供相关趋势。对病理学家和所有在社区医疗机构护理 CRC 患者的医生进行教育是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
"It Is What It Is" - The Lived Experience of Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Dissection. "Ups and Downs, Joys and Sorrows" - Assessment and Clinical Relevance of Patient Priorities in an Interdisciplinary Parkinson's Disease Clinic. Assessing the Climate Readiness of Physician Education Leaders in Graduate Medical Education. Determining the Prognostic Value of Complete Blood Count Subgroup Parameters in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Factors Influencing Self-Wound Care Adoption in Singaporean Communities: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1