Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for Clubfoot Deformity: Cuboid Versus Lateral Cuneiform.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002852
Madison Craft, Gage Calhoon, Thomas R Lewis
{"title":"Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for Clubfoot Deformity: Cuboid Versus Lateral Cuneiform.","authors":"Madison Craft, Gage Calhoon, Thomas R Lewis","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibialis anterior tendon transfer in relapsing clubfoot deformity is a well-known treatment option for dynamic forefoot supination and adduction deformities. The tibialis anterior tendon can be anchored to the lateral cuneiform or the cuboid. A complication of this surgery is overcorrection to a flatfoot deformity or undercorrection that maintains the clubfoot deformity. We compared reoperation rates and clinical outcomes between these 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study performed from 2005 to 2020. The primary outcome was repeat operation. The secondary outcome included clinical appearance scores described by Garceau and Palmer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 114 clubfeet (111 patients) treated in our study. Of them, 67 (58.8%) had a transfer to the lateral cuneiform, whereas 47 (41.2%) had a transfer to the cuboid. Nine patients had reoperations which included 4 (44.4%) in the lateral cuneiform group and 5 (55.6%) in the cuboid group which was not statistically significant (P=0.485). Clinical appearance scores revealed significantly better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group (P=0.0172).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no clinically significant differences in reoperation rates between transfers to the lateral cuneiform versus the cuboid. We did find better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tibialis anterior tendon transfer in relapsing clubfoot deformity is a well-known treatment option for dynamic forefoot supination and adduction deformities. The tibialis anterior tendon can be anchored to the lateral cuneiform or the cuboid. A complication of this surgery is overcorrection to a flatfoot deformity or undercorrection that maintains the clubfoot deformity. We compared reoperation rates and clinical outcomes between these 2 groups.

Methods: This is a retrospective study performed from 2005 to 2020. The primary outcome was repeat operation. The secondary outcome included clinical appearance scores described by Garceau and Palmer.

Results: There were 114 clubfeet (111 patients) treated in our study. Of them, 67 (58.8%) had a transfer to the lateral cuneiform, whereas 47 (41.2%) had a transfer to the cuboid. Nine patients had reoperations which included 4 (44.4%) in the lateral cuneiform group and 5 (55.6%) in the cuboid group which was not statistically significant (P=0.485). Clinical appearance scores revealed significantly better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group (P=0.0172).

Conclusions: There were no clinically significant differences in reoperation rates between transfers to the lateral cuneiform versus the cuboid. We did find better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group.

Level of evidence: Level III retrospective comparative study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胫骨前肌腱转移治疗马蹄内翻足畸形:立方体与外侧楔形。
背景:胫骨前肌腱转移治疗复发性马蹄内翻足畸形是治疗动态前足上翻和内收畸形的一种众所周知的方法。胫骨前肌腱可固定在外侧楔形骨或立方骨上。这种手术的一个并发症是过度矫正成扁平足畸形,或矫正不足而维持马蹄内翻足畸形。我们对这两组患者的再手术率和临床结果进行了比较:这是一项从2005年到2020年进行的回顾性研究。主要结果是再次手术。次要结果包括 Garceau 和 Palmer 所描述的临床外观评分:我们的研究共治疗了 114 例足癣患者(111 例)。其中,67人(58.8%)转至外侧楔形骨,47人(41.2%)转至楔形骨。9名患者进行了再次手术,其中外侧楔形肌组4人(44.4%),立方肌组5人(55.6%),这两组患者的再次手术率无统计学意义(P=0.485)。临床外观评分显示,外侧楔形组术后临床外观明显优于立方体组(P=0.0172):结论:转移到外侧楔形肌与立方肌之间的再手术率没有明显的临床差异。我们确实发现外侧楔形肌组术后的临床表现优于立方肌组:证据等级:III级回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Serial Foot Radiographs to Determine Foot Height Multipliers. Long-term Clinical and Radiographic Results of Posteromedial Lateral Release for Neuromuscular Clubfoot Deformity. Injuries Following COVID-19 Infection in Academy-level Male Youth Soccer Players. What is the Utilization and Impact of Advanced Imaging for Tibial Tubercle Fractures? An Analysis of 598 Patients From the Tibial Tubercle Study (TITUS) Group. Rib-on-Pelvis Deformity and Reported Pain in Neuromuscular Early-Onset Scoliosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1