A comparative analysis of unsupervised machine-learning methods in PSG-related phenotyping.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1111/jsr.14349
Mohammadreza Ghorvei, Tuomas Karhu, Salla Hietakoste, Daniela Ferreira-Santos, Harald Hrubos-Strøm, Anna Sigridur Islind, Luka Biedebach, Sami Nikkonen, Timo Leppänen, Matias Rusanen
{"title":"A comparative analysis of unsupervised machine-learning methods in PSG-related phenotyping.","authors":"Mohammadreza Ghorvei, Tuomas Karhu, Salla Hietakoste, Daniela Ferreira-Santos, Harald Hrubos-Strøm, Anna Sigridur Islind, Luka Biedebach, Sami Nikkonen, Timo Leppänen, Matias Rusanen","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obstructive sleep apnea is a heterogeneous sleep disorder with varying phenotypes. Several studies have already performed cluster analyses to discover various obstructive sleep apnea phenotypic clusters. However, the selection of the clustering method might affect the outputs. Consequently, it is unclear whether similar obstructive sleep apnea clusters can be reproduced using different clustering methods. In this study, we applied four well-known clustering methods: Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering; K-means; Fuzzy C-means; and Gaussian Mixture Model to a population of 865 suspected obstructive sleep apnea patients. By creating five clusters with each method, we examined the effect of clustering methods on forming obstructive sleep apnea clusters and the differences in their physiological characteristics. We utilized a visualization technique to indicate the cluster formations, Cohen's kappa statistics to find the similarity and agreement between clustering methods, and performance evaluation to compare the clustering performance. As a result, two out of five clusters were distinctly different with all four methods, while three other clusters exhibited overlapping features across all methods. In terms of agreement, Fuzzy C-means and K-means had the strongest (κ = 0.87), and Agglomerative hierarchical clustering and Gaussian Mixture Model had the weakest agreement (κ = 0.51) between each other. The K-means showed the best clustering performance, followed by the Fuzzy C-means in most evaluation criteria. Moreover, Fuzzy C-means showed the greatest potential in handling overlapping clusters compared with other methods. In conclusion, we revealed a direct impact of clustering method selection on the formation and physiological characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea clusters. In addition, we highlighted the capability of soft clustering methods, particularly Fuzzy C-means, in the application of obstructive sleep apnea phenotyping.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea is a heterogeneous sleep disorder with varying phenotypes. Several studies have already performed cluster analyses to discover various obstructive sleep apnea phenotypic clusters. However, the selection of the clustering method might affect the outputs. Consequently, it is unclear whether similar obstructive sleep apnea clusters can be reproduced using different clustering methods. In this study, we applied four well-known clustering methods: Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering; K-means; Fuzzy C-means; and Gaussian Mixture Model to a population of 865 suspected obstructive sleep apnea patients. By creating five clusters with each method, we examined the effect of clustering methods on forming obstructive sleep apnea clusters and the differences in their physiological characteristics. We utilized a visualization technique to indicate the cluster formations, Cohen's kappa statistics to find the similarity and agreement between clustering methods, and performance evaluation to compare the clustering performance. As a result, two out of five clusters were distinctly different with all four methods, while three other clusters exhibited overlapping features across all methods. In terms of agreement, Fuzzy C-means and K-means had the strongest (κ = 0.87), and Agglomerative hierarchical clustering and Gaussian Mixture Model had the weakest agreement (κ = 0.51) between each other. The K-means showed the best clustering performance, followed by the Fuzzy C-means in most evaluation criteria. Moreover, Fuzzy C-means showed the greatest potential in handling overlapping clusters compared with other methods. In conclusion, we revealed a direct impact of clustering method selection on the formation and physiological characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea clusters. In addition, we highlighted the capability of soft clustering methods, particularly Fuzzy C-means, in the application of obstructive sleep apnea phenotyping.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PSG 相关表型中无监督机器学习方法的比较分析。
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停是一种表型各异的睡眠障碍。已有多项研究通过聚类分析发现了各种阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的表型聚类。然而,聚类方法的选择可能会影响结果。因此,目前还不清楚使用不同的聚类方法能否再现类似的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停群。在本研究中,我们采用了四种著名的聚类方法:聚合分层聚类、K-均值聚类、模糊 C-均值聚类和高斯混合模型。通过使用每种方法创建五个聚类,我们研究了聚类方法对形成阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停聚类的影响及其生理特征的差异。我们利用可视化技术来显示聚类的形成,利用科恩卡帕统计来发现聚类方法之间的相似性和一致性,并利用性能评估来比较聚类的性能。结果显示,在所有四种方法中,五个聚类中有两个聚类的特征明显不同,而另外三个聚类则在所有方法中表现出重叠特征。就一致性而言,模糊 C 均值聚类和 K 均值聚类的一致性最强(κ = 0.87),聚合分层聚类和高斯混合模型的一致性最弱(κ = 0.51)。在大多数评价标准中,K-均值聚类的聚类性能最好,其次是模糊 C-均值聚类。此外,与其他方法相比,模糊 C-means 在处理重叠聚类方面表现出最大的潜力。总之,我们发现聚类方法的选择对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停聚类的形成和生理特征有直接影响。此外,我们还强调了软聚类方法,尤其是模糊均值法在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停表型分析中的应用能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
期刊最新文献
Poor sleep quality is a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection: A prospective cohort study. Pilot analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-based contributors to patient-centred optimization of mandibular advancement devices in obstructive sleep apnea. Differential effects of sleep position and sleep stage on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Sex-specific changes in sleep quality with aging: Insights from wearable device analysis. The efficacy and safety of dual orexin receptor antagonists in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1