Can Video Annotation Software With Minimal Standardization Be Used as a Back-Up for a Marker-Free Motion Tracking System when Monitoring Barbell Thruster Velocity During a Repeated Circuit?

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004971
Gerald T Mangine, Ashley Hines, Jacob Grazer, Tiffany A Esmat, John McLester
{"title":"Can Video Annotation Software With Minimal Standardization Be Used as a Back-Up for a Marker-Free Motion Tracking System when Monitoring Barbell Thruster Velocity During a Repeated Circuit?","authors":"Gerald T Mangine, Ashley Hines, Jacob Grazer, Tiffany A Esmat, John McLester","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Mangine, GT, Hines, A, Grazer, J, Esmat, TA, and McLester, J. Can video annotation software with minimal standardization be used as a back-up for a marker-free motion tracking system when monitoring barbell thruster velocity during a repeated circuit? J Strength Cond Res 39(2): 147-155, 2025-This study examined the agreement between a marker-free motion tracking system (PERCH) and a free video annotation software (KINOVEA) for measuring barbell thruster velocity using minimal standardization. For a larger placebo-controlled supplement intervention, 10 men (28.7 ± 8.0 years, 175 ± 8 cm, 91.0 ± 12.0 kg) and 10 women (31.3 ± 5.2 years, 167 ± 4 cm, 70 ± 13 kg) completed a circuit of rowing, 6 barbell thrusters (men: 43.1 kg, women: 29.5 kg), and 3 box jumps for \"as many repetitions as possible\" (AMRAP) in either 5 or 15 minutes. Barbell velocity (m × second -1 ) was monitored by PERCH from the frontal plane, whereas all sessions were video recorded from the same view and subsequently analyzed by KINOVEA using natural barbell landmarks. Fifty repetitions were randomly and equally drawn from each participant ( n = 1,000 repetitions) across all workout and supplement conditions. Although Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed no differences (mean difference = 0.03 m × second -1 , p = 0.332), KINOVEA only explained 2.6% of PERCH variance, and Spearman's correlation analysis of Bland-Altman plots suggested that differences between technologies were exacerbated by the magnitude of velocity ( ρ = -0.62, p < 0.001). Cross-validated, regression analysis using KINOVEA and readily available participant demographics (arm reach and biological sex) improved prediction by 13.4% but agreement remained inconsistent ( ρ = 0.73, p < 0.001). Neither KINOVEA nor KINOVEA combined with participant demographics are interchangeable with PERCH for monitoring barbell velocity during an AMRAP. Still, researchers and athletes might use this free and accessible software as back-up for whenever PERCH fails to detect repetitions, as some information is better than none.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"147-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Mangine, GT, Hines, A, Grazer, J, Esmat, TA, and McLester, J. Can video annotation software with minimal standardization be used as a back-up for a marker-free motion tracking system when monitoring barbell thruster velocity during a repeated circuit? J Strength Cond Res 39(2): 147-155, 2025-This study examined the agreement between a marker-free motion tracking system (PERCH) and a free video annotation software (KINOVEA) for measuring barbell thruster velocity using minimal standardization. For a larger placebo-controlled supplement intervention, 10 men (28.7 ± 8.0 years, 175 ± 8 cm, 91.0 ± 12.0 kg) and 10 women (31.3 ± 5.2 years, 167 ± 4 cm, 70 ± 13 kg) completed a circuit of rowing, 6 barbell thrusters (men: 43.1 kg, women: 29.5 kg), and 3 box jumps for "as many repetitions as possible" (AMRAP) in either 5 or 15 minutes. Barbell velocity (m × second -1 ) was monitored by PERCH from the frontal plane, whereas all sessions were video recorded from the same view and subsequently analyzed by KINOVEA using natural barbell landmarks. Fifty repetitions were randomly and equally drawn from each participant ( n = 1,000 repetitions) across all workout and supplement conditions. Although Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed no differences (mean difference = 0.03 m × second -1 , p = 0.332), KINOVEA only explained 2.6% of PERCH variance, and Spearman's correlation analysis of Bland-Altman plots suggested that differences between technologies were exacerbated by the magnitude of velocity ( ρ = -0.62, p < 0.001). Cross-validated, regression analysis using KINOVEA and readily available participant demographics (arm reach and biological sex) improved prediction by 13.4% but agreement remained inconsistent ( ρ = 0.73, p < 0.001). Neither KINOVEA nor KINOVEA combined with participant demographics are interchangeable with PERCH for monitoring barbell velocity during an AMRAP. Still, researchers and athletes might use this free and accessible software as back-up for whenever PERCH fails to detect repetitions, as some information is better than none.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在监测重复循环过程中的杠铃推举速度时,标准化程度最低的视频注释软件能否作为无标记运动跟踪系统的备用软件?
摘要:Mangine,GT,Hines,A,Grazer,J,Esmat,TA 和 McLester,J.在重复循环过程中监测杠铃推举速度时,标准化程度最低的视频注释软件能否用作无标记运动跟踪系统的后备系统?J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-本研究考察了无标记运动跟踪系统(PERCH)和免费视频注释软件(KINOVEA)在使用最小标准化测量杠铃推举速度时的一致性。在一项更大规模的安慰剂对照补充干预中,10 名男性(28.7 ± 8.0 岁,175 ± 8 厘米,91.0 ± 12.0 千克)和 10 名女性(31.3 ± 5.2 岁,167 ± 4 厘米,70 ± 13 千克)在 5 或 15 分钟内完成了划船、6 次杠铃推举(男性:43.1 千克,女性:29.5 千克)和 3 次 "尽可能多重复"(AMRAP)的箱形跳。杠铃速度(米×秒-1)由 PERCH 从正面进行监测,所有训练均从同一视角进行录像,随后由 KINOVEA 利用自然杠铃地标进行分析。在所有训练和补充条件下,从每位参与者中随机平均抽取 50 次重复训练(n = 1,000 次重复训练)。尽管 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验显示没有差异(平均差异 = 0.03 米 × 秒 -1,p = 0.332),但 KINOVEA 只解释了 PERCH 变异的 2.6%,对 Bland-Altman 图进行的斯皮尔曼相关分析表明,速度的大小加剧了不同技术之间的差异 ( ρ = -0.62,p < 0.001)。使用 KINOVEA 和现成的参与者人口统计数据(臂力和生理性别)进行交叉验证、回归分析后,预测结果提高了 13.4%,但一致性仍不一致 ( ρ = 0.73,p < 0.001)。无论是 KINOVEA 还是 KINOVEA 与参与者人口统计数据相结合,都不能与 PERCH 互换,用于监测 AMRAP 期间的杠铃速度。不过,当 PERCH 无法检测到重复次数时,研究人员和运动员还是可以使用这款免费且易于使用的软件作为备用,因为有信息总比没有信息好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Position-Specific Differences in Speed Profiles Among National Football League Scouting Combine Participants. Examining the Influence of Season Phase, Age, and Anthropometrics on Body Composition Trends in National Basketball Association Athletes. Impedance Spectroscopy Measures of Whole and Segmental Skeletal Muscle Quantity Associated With Strength and Power in Collegiate Ice Hockey Players. Peak Lower-Extremity Power Unadjusted for Body Mass Predicts Fastball Velocity in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers. Soft Tissue Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit Revealed Detailed Musculoskeletal Factors of Baseball Players.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1