What Military Applicants Value When Choosing a Residency in Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usae472
Judith Makenzie Mathess, Kristina Karlson, Lindsay Chatfield, Katerina Shvartsman
{"title":"What Military Applicants Value When Choosing a Residency in Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics.","authors":"Judith Makenzie Mathess, Kristina Karlson, Lindsay Chatfield, Katerina Shvartsman","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military medical students participate in a separate residency match program, distinct from their civilian counterparts. There is limited information regarding factors that applicants find important when selecting a residency program in Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics (GSO). We aimed to identify factors that influence applicant program selection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A voluntary, anonymous, 45-question survey was distributed to military candidates pursuing GSO residency training in the fall of 2023. Participants were asked to rate the factors they considered most important when ranking residency programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven of the sixty (61.7%) applicants completed the survey. The culture of the residency program was deemed \"important\" by most participants (94.6%), followed by surgical volume (70.3%) and obstetric volume (70.3%). When asked to rank selection factors, the culture of the residency program, geographic location, and surgical volume were among the top 5 influential factors for the majority of applicants. Participants considered the following factors \"not important\": Salary (military pay versus civilian salary) (43.2%), research opportunities (32.4%), and availability of abortion training (21.6%). Most military applicants (62.2%) stated that abortion restrictions would not affect program selection, while 37.8% reported that this would affect their rankings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics military applicants deemed the residency program's culture, surgical volume, and obstetrical volume to be the most important factors impacting residency program selection. Residency programs can use these findings to promote program strengths, improve program shortfalls, and guide applicant recruitment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e823-e829"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Military medical students participate in a separate residency match program, distinct from their civilian counterparts. There is limited information regarding factors that applicants find important when selecting a residency program in Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics (GSO). We aimed to identify factors that influence applicant program selection.

Materials and methods: A voluntary, anonymous, 45-question survey was distributed to military candidates pursuing GSO residency training in the fall of 2023. Participants were asked to rate the factors they considered most important when ranking residency programs.

Results: Thirty-seven of the sixty (61.7%) applicants completed the survey. The culture of the residency program was deemed "important" by most participants (94.6%), followed by surgical volume (70.3%) and obstetric volume (70.3%). When asked to rank selection factors, the culture of the residency program, geographic location, and surgical volume were among the top 5 influential factors for the majority of applicants. Participants considered the following factors "not important": Salary (military pay versus civilian salary) (43.2%), research opportunities (32.4%), and availability of abortion training (21.6%). Most military applicants (62.2%) stated that abortion restrictions would not affect program selection, while 37.8% reported that this would affect their rankings.

Conclusions: Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics military applicants deemed the residency program's culture, surgical volume, and obstetrical volume to be the most important factors impacting residency program selection. Residency programs can use these findings to promote program strengths, improve program shortfalls, and guide applicant recruitment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军人申请者在选择妇科手术和产科住院医师时看重的是什么?
导言:军医学生参加的住院医师配对计划与平民学生不同。有关申请者在选择妇科手术和产科(GSO)住院医师培训项目时认为重要的因素的信息很有限。我们旨在找出影响申请人选择项目的因素:我们向希望在 2023 年秋季接受妇产科住院医师培训的军人候选人发放了一份自愿、匿名、包含 45 个问题的调查问卷。调查要求参与者在对住院医师培训项目进行排名时对他们认为最重要的因素进行评分:六十名申请人中有三十七人(61.7%)完成了调查。大多数参与者(94.6%)认为住院医师培训项目的文化 "重要",其次是外科手术量(70.3%)和产科手术量(70.3%)。当被要求对选择因素进行排序时,住院医师培训项目的文化、地理位置和手术量是对大多数申请人影响最大的 5 个因素。参与者认为以下因素 "不重要":薪资(军人薪资与平民薪资的比较)(43.2%)、研究机会(32.4%)和是否有流产培训(21.6%)。大多数军方申请者(62.2%)表示,堕胎限制不会影响课程选择,而 37.8% 的申请者表示这会影响他们的排名:妇科手术和产科的军方申请者认为住院医师培训项目的文化、手术量和产科手术量是影响住院医师培训项目选择的最重要因素。住院医师培训项目可以利用这些发现来提升项目的优势、改善项目的不足并指导申请人的招募工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
Mitigating Impostor Phenomenon of Onboarding Military Medical Students: A Workshop Utilizing Situated Learning Theory. Behavioral Health Outcomes in the 12 Months Following Major Limb Loss Among Active Duty Service Members Treated in the Military Health System, 2001-2017. Characteristics of the Course of Anemia as a Consequence of Combat Injuries in Military Servicemen Participating in High-Intensity Combat Actions. Impact of Low-Level Blast Exposure From Military Training and Career Cumulation on Hearing Outcomes. Optimizing Austere Surgical Team Efficiency: An Evaluation of Team Composition During U.S. Air Force Ground Surgical Team Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1