Aging Processes of Working Memory in Different Modalities.

IF 3.2 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology International Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.3390/neurolint16050084
Ohad Levi, Eyal Heled
{"title":"Aging Processes of Working Memory in Different Modalities.","authors":"Ohad Levi, Eyal Heled","doi":"10.3390/neurolint16050084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Working memory (WM) involves temporarily storing and manipulating information. Research on the impact of aging on WM has shown inconsistent results regarding the decline in visual and verbal WM, with a lack of studies on tactile WM. This study aimed to assess the effects of aging on WM across verbal, visuospatial, and tactile modalities using span tasks of forward (storage) and backward (manipulation) stages. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 130 participants, divided into four age groups of 20-29, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89, completed the Digit, Visuospatial, and Tactual Spans. Performance was analyzed using a 3 (Task) × 4 (Group) × 2 (Stage) mixed design repeated measures ANOVA. <b>Results</b>: The analysis revealed significant main effects for modality (<i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.15), age (<i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.48), and stage (<i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.30). Digit Span outperformed the other modalities, while Tactual Span showed the worst performance. Additionally, task performance declined with age, and the forward stage was superior to the backward stage. Interaction effects indicated that Digit Span was less affected by aging compared to the Visuospatial and Tactual Spans (<i>p</i> = 0.004, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.07). Post hoc analyses further revealed that the Digit Span consistently outperformed the other modalities in both stages, with more pronounced differences observed in the forward stage. <b>Conclusions</b>: Verbal WM is more resilient to aging compared to the other modalities while tactile WM declines with age in a manner similar to verbal and visuospatial WM, suggesting a modality-specific impact of aging on WM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"16 5","pages":"1122-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint16050084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Working memory (WM) involves temporarily storing and manipulating information. Research on the impact of aging on WM has shown inconsistent results regarding the decline in visual and verbal WM, with a lack of studies on tactile WM. This study aimed to assess the effects of aging on WM across verbal, visuospatial, and tactile modalities using span tasks of forward (storage) and backward (manipulation) stages. Methods: A total of 130 participants, divided into four age groups of 20-29, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89, completed the Digit, Visuospatial, and Tactual Spans. Performance was analyzed using a 3 (Task) × 4 (Group) × 2 (Stage) mixed design repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The analysis revealed significant main effects for modality (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.15), age (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.48), and stage (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.30). Digit Span outperformed the other modalities, while Tactual Span showed the worst performance. Additionally, task performance declined with age, and the forward stage was superior to the backward stage. Interaction effects indicated that Digit Span was less affected by aging compared to the Visuospatial and Tactual Spans (p = 0.004, ηp2 = 0.07). Post hoc analyses further revealed that the Digit Span consistently outperformed the other modalities in both stages, with more pronounced differences observed in the forward stage. Conclusions: Verbal WM is more resilient to aging compared to the other modalities while tactile WM declines with age in a manner similar to verbal and visuospatial WM, suggesting a modality-specific impact of aging on WM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同模式下工作记忆的衰老过程
背景:工作记忆(WM工作记忆(WM)包括临时存储和处理信息。有关衰老对工作记忆影响的研究表明,视觉和言语工作记忆下降的结果并不一致,而对触觉工作记忆的研究则比较缺乏。本研究旨在使用前向(存储)和后向(操作)阶段的跨度任务,评估衰老对言语、视觉空间和触觉模式的 WM 的影响。研究方法共有 130 名参与者(分为 20-29 岁、60-69 岁、70-79 岁和 80-89 岁四个年龄组)完成了数字跨度、视觉空间跨度和触觉跨度任务。采用 3(任务)×4(组别)×2(阶段)混合设计重复测量方差分析法对成绩进行分析。结果显示分析结果显示,模式(p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.15)、年龄(p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.48)和阶段(p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.30)的主效应明显。数字跨度的表现优于其他模式,而触觉跨度的表现最差。此外,任务成绩随年龄增长而下降,前向阶段优于后向阶段。交互效应表明,与视觉空间跨度和触觉跨度相比,数字跨度受年龄影响较小(p = 0.004,ηp2 = 0.07)。事后分析进一步表明,数字跨度在两个阶段的表现均优于其他模式,在前向阶段观察到的差异更为明显。结论与其他模式相比,言语记忆力对衰老的抵抗力更强,而触觉记忆力则随着年龄的增长而下降,其下降方式与言语和视觉空间记忆力相似,这表明衰老对记忆力的影响具有模式特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sensitization and Habituation of Hyper-Excitation to Constant Presentation of Pattern-Glare Stimuli. Evolution of Cognitive Disorders in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) After Ischemic Stroke: Secondary Data Analysis from the Improved Health Care in Neurology and Psychiatry-Longer Life (IHCNP) Study. Macamides as Potential Therapeutic Agents in Neurological Disorders. Slow Subcutaneous Release of Glatiramer Acetate or CD40-Targeting Peptide KGYY6 Is More Advantageous in Treating Ongoing Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis. Mindfulness-Based Interventions and the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1