Convergence insufficiency prevalence in attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder children depends on the diagnosis criteria.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1111/opo.13411
Laura Clavé, Aurora Torrents
{"title":"Convergence insufficiency prevalence in attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder children depends on the diagnosis criteria.","authors":"Laura Clavé, Aurora Torrents","doi":"10.1111/opo.13411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental condition commonly seen in children and adolescents, characterised by an increase in distractibility or inattention. Several studies have noted a higher rate of visual problems in this group, especially convergence insufficiency (CI), but when using different diagnostic criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate visual function in ADHD children and non-ADHD controls to compare the different signs for diagnosis of CI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this prospective case-control study, a group of children aged 7-17 years, diagnosed with ADHD before the start of pharmacological treatment and matched for age and gender with non-ADHD controls were examined. Visual acuity (VA), objective and subjective refraction, accommodative amplitude and facility, heterophoria, positive and negative fusional vergences (PFV and NFV) and stereopsis were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants (30 ADHD and 30 non-ADHD controls) were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the two groups for VA, refraction and accommodative abilities. There were significant differences in PFV and NFV: PFV break/recovery values for the ADHD and control groups were 18.9/16.2∆ and 26.9/22.1∆, respectively. Respective values for NFV were 15.7/13∆ and 19.3/15.9∆. Using the three signs of receded near point of convergence (NPC), decreased PFV and exophoria 4∆ greater at near than distance, the prevalence of CI was equivalent for the ADHD and controls (p = 0.34) If only two signs were considered for the CI diagnosis, (i.e., receded NPC and decreased PFV), then prevalence was significantly greater for the ADHD group (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results show a higher prevalence of binocular vision problems in the ADHD group. This suggests a relationship between vergence problems and ADHD, but the direction of this link remains unclear. Further studies with specific samples may be needed to understand fully the association between binocular vision disorders and ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental condition commonly seen in children and adolescents, characterised by an increase in distractibility or inattention. Several studies have noted a higher rate of visual problems in this group, especially convergence insufficiency (CI), but when using different diagnostic criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate visual function in ADHD children and non-ADHD controls to compare the different signs for diagnosis of CI.

Method: In this prospective case-control study, a group of children aged 7-17 years, diagnosed with ADHD before the start of pharmacological treatment and matched for age and gender with non-ADHD controls were examined. Visual acuity (VA), objective and subjective refraction, accommodative amplitude and facility, heterophoria, positive and negative fusional vergences (PFV and NFV) and stereopsis were assessed.

Results: Sixty participants (30 ADHD and 30 non-ADHD controls) were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the two groups for VA, refraction and accommodative abilities. There were significant differences in PFV and NFV: PFV break/recovery values for the ADHD and control groups were 18.9/16.2∆ and 26.9/22.1∆, respectively. Respective values for NFV were 15.7/13∆ and 19.3/15.9∆. Using the three signs of receded near point of convergence (NPC), decreased PFV and exophoria 4∆ greater at near than distance, the prevalence of CI was equivalent for the ADHD and controls (p = 0.34) If only two signs were considered for the CI diagnosis, (i.e., receded NPC and decreased PFV), then prevalence was significantly greater for the ADHD group (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: These results show a higher prevalence of binocular vision problems in the ADHD group. This suggests a relationship between vergence problems and ADHD, but the direction of this link remains unclear. Further studies with specific samples may be needed to understand fully the association between binocular vision disorders and ADHD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意力缺陷和多动症儿童的会聚功能障碍患病率取决于诊断标准。
目的:注意力缺陷和多动症(ADHD)是一种常见于儿童和青少年的神经发育疾病,其特点是注意力容易分散或不集中。有几项研究指出,在这一群体中,视觉问题的发生率较高,尤其是辐辏不全(CI),但使用的诊断标准不同。本研究的目的是评估多动症儿童和非多动症对照组的视觉功能,比较诊断 CI 的不同体征:在这项前瞻性病例对照研究中,一组 7-17 岁的儿童在开始接受药物治疗前被诊断为多动症,其年龄和性别与非多动症对照组相匹配。研究评估了视力(VA)、客观和主观屈光度、容纳幅度和容纳能力、异视症、正视和负视融合度(PFV 和 NFV)以及立体视:对 60 名参与者(30 名多动症患者和 30 名非多动症对照组患者)进行了评估。两组在视力、屈光和适应能力方面没有明显差异。PFV和NFV存在明显差异:ADHD组和对照组的PFV断裂/恢复值分别为18.9/16.2∆和26.9/22.1∆。NFV 的相应值分别为 15.7/13∆ 和 19.3/15.9∆。如果只考虑两个征象(即近聚点后退和远聚点后退)来诊断 CI,那么 ADHD 组的患病率明显高于对照组(p 结论:CI 的患病率高于对照组):这些结果表明,多动症组的双眼视力问题发生率更高。这表明远视问题与多动症之间存在联系,但这种联系的方向仍不明确。要全面了解双眼视力障碍与多动症之间的关系,可能需要对特定样本进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with myopia in the Portuguese child population: An epidemiological study. Mechanism of optical treatments for myopia: Are lenslets joining the DOTs? Uptake of eye care services in South India: Retrospective mapping of self-reported barriers using the Theoretical Domains Framework. One hundred years and counting. Extracting full information from OCT scans-signs of early age-related macular degeneration within inner retinal layers by local neighbourhood statistics. Part I: Methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1