Pediatric Burn Care for Burn Injury: Outcomes by Timing of Referral Using a U.S. Single-Center Retrospective Cohort, 2005-2019.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003623
Hannah L Gale, Steven J Staffa, Matthew A DePamphilis, Sarah Tsay, Jeffrey Burns, Robert Sheridan
{"title":"Pediatric Burn Care for Burn Injury: Outcomes by Timing of Referral Using a U.S. Single-Center Retrospective Cohort, 2005-2019.","authors":"Hannah L Gale, Steven J Staffa, Matthew A DePamphilis, Sarah Tsay, Jeffrey Burns, Robert Sheridan","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Burn centers offer specialized care to pediatric patients with burn injuries. However, data about outcome in relation to timing of transfer are limited. We examined these timings and outcomes among burn-injured pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective cohort study of U.S. national and international practice.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Shriners ESO Trauma Burn Registry, 2005-2019.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients 0-17 years old admitted to a pediatric burn center with 10-80% total body surface area (TBSA) burn between 2005 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The cohort of 761 patients was subcategorized according to timing of referral: early presentation (EP) (0-7 d), delayed presentation (DP) (8-60 d), and very delayed presentation (VDP) (> 60 d). Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, percent TBSA (%TBSA)/LOS ratio, mortality, and disposition. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and continuous outcomes were compared using median regression, both utilizing multivariable analysis adjusting for a priori confounders and presented as adjusted coefficients (ACs) with 95% CI. Delayed referral (DP and VDP) was associated with higher %TBSA burn and with fewer referrals from high-income countries. Compared with EP, VDP was associated with higher LOS/%TBSA (AC, 0.2 [0.01-0.4]). On univariate analysis, in comparison with EP, DP and VDP were associated with higher ICU (DP 16 [6-29]; VDP 8 [0-18]) and hospital LOS (DP 34 [21-55]; VDP 32 [18-58]). Overall, ten of 761 patients died (1.3%), and we found no association between timing of referral and mortality. Also, in 751 survivors, 635 patients (84.6%) were discharged home without home health, and we found no association with timing of referral on multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this report, we have reviewed our single-center, international burn-injured pediatric cohort, operating in the United States (2005-2019). We find that referral with VDP as opposed to EP was associated with increased LOS/%TBSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Burn centers offer specialized care to pediatric patients with burn injuries. However, data about outcome in relation to timing of transfer are limited. We examined these timings and outcomes among burn-injured pediatric patients.

Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of U.S. national and international practice.

Setting: Shriners ESO Trauma Burn Registry, 2005-2019.

Patients: Patients 0-17 years old admitted to a pediatric burn center with 10-80% total body surface area (TBSA) burn between 2005 and 2019.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The cohort of 761 patients was subcategorized according to timing of referral: early presentation (EP) (0-7 d), delayed presentation (DP) (8-60 d), and very delayed presentation (VDP) (> 60 d). Primary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, percent TBSA (%TBSA)/LOS ratio, mortality, and disposition. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and continuous outcomes were compared using median regression, both utilizing multivariable analysis adjusting for a priori confounders and presented as adjusted coefficients (ACs) with 95% CI. Delayed referral (DP and VDP) was associated with higher %TBSA burn and with fewer referrals from high-income countries. Compared with EP, VDP was associated with higher LOS/%TBSA (AC, 0.2 [0.01-0.4]). On univariate analysis, in comparison with EP, DP and VDP were associated with higher ICU (DP 16 [6-29]; VDP 8 [0-18]) and hospital LOS (DP 34 [21-55]; VDP 32 [18-58]). Overall, ten of 761 patients died (1.3%), and we found no association between timing of referral and mortality. Also, in 751 survivors, 635 patients (84.6%) were discharged home without home health, and we found no association with timing of referral on multivariable analysis.

Conclusions: In this report, we have reviewed our single-center, international burn-injured pediatric cohort, operating in the United States (2005-2019). We find that referral with VDP as opposed to EP was associated with increased LOS/%TBSA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿烧伤的烧伤护理:2005-2019年美国单中心回顾性队列转诊时间的结果。
目标:烧伤中心为儿科烧伤患者提供专业护理。然而,与转院时机相关的治疗效果数据却很有限。我们对烧伤儿科患者的转院时间和转院效果进行了研究:设计:对美国国内和国际惯例的单中心回顾性队列研究:背景:2005-2019年Shriners ESO创伤烧伤登记处:2005年至2019年期间儿科烧伤中心收治的烧伤总体表面积(TBSA)为10%-80%的0-17岁患者:测量和主要结果根据转诊时间对761名患者进行了分类:早期转诊(EP)(0-7 d)、延迟转诊(DP)(8-60 d)和非常延迟转诊(VDP)(> 60 d)。主要结果包括住院时间(LOS)、ICU LOS、TBSA 百分比(%TBSA)/LOS 比率、死亡率和处置。二分结果采用逻辑回归进行分析,连续结果采用中位回归进行比较,二者均采用多变量分析,对先验混杂因素进行调整,并以调整系数(AC)和 95% CI 表示。延迟转诊(DP 和 VDP)与烧伤的 TBSA 百分比较高和来自高收入国家的转诊较少有关。与 EP 相比,VDP 与较高的 LOS/%TBSA 相关(AC,0.2 [0.01-0.4])。单变量分析显示,与 EP 相比,DP 和 VDP 与较高的 ICU(DP 16 [6-29];VDP 8 [0-18])和住院时间(DP 34 [21-55];VDP 32 [18-58])相关。总体而言,761 名患者中有 10 人死亡(1.3%),我们发现转诊时间与死亡率之间没有关联。此外,在 751 名幸存者中,有 635 名患者(84.6%)在没有家庭医疗服务的情况下出院回家,我们在多变量分析中没有发现转诊时间与死亡率之间的关系:在这份报告中,我们回顾了在美国开展业务的单中心国际烧伤儿科队列(2005-2019 年)。我们发现,与 EP 相比,VDP 的转诊与 LOS/%TBSA 的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
期刊最新文献
The 2024 Pediatric Sepsis Challenge: Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Children With Suspected Sepsis in Uganda. The Power of Goodbyes. Evolution and Impact of a Diagnostic Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program in a PICU. Evaluation of a Comprehensive Algorithm for PICU Patients With New Fever or Instability: Association of Clinical Decision Support With Testing Practices. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Outcomes in a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort, 2009-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1