Investigation of scatter energy window width and count levels for deep learning-based attenuation map estimation in cardiac SPECT/CT imaging.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Physics in medicine and biology Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ad8b09
Yuan Chen, P Hendrik Pretorius, Yongyi Yang, Michael A King, Clifford Lindsay
{"title":"Investigation of scatter energy window width and count levels for deep learning-based attenuation map estimation in cardiac SPECT/CT imaging.","authors":"Yuan Chen, P Hendrik Pretorius, Yongyi Yang, Michael A King, Clifford Lindsay","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8b09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Deep learning (DL) is becoming increasingly important in generating attenuation maps for accurate attenuation correction (AC) in cardiac perfusion SPECT imaging. Typically, DL models take inputs from initial reconstructed SPECT images, which are performed on the photopeak window and often also on scatter windows. While prior studies have demonstrated improvements in DL performance when scatter window images are incorporated into the DL input, the comprehensive analysis of the impact of employing different scatter windows remains unassessed. Additionally, existing research mainly focuses on applying DL to SPECT scans obtained at clinical standard count levels. This study aimed to assess utilities of DL from two aspects: (1) investigating the impact when different scatter windows were used as input to DL, and (2) evaluating the performance of DL when applied on SPECT scans acquired at a reduced count level.<i>Approach.</i>We utilized 1517 subjects, with 386 subjects for testing and the remaining 1131 for training and validation.<i>Main results.</i>The results showed that as scatter window width increased from 4% to 30%, a slight improvement was observed in DL estimated attenuation maps. The application of DL models to quarter-count (¼-count) SPECT scans, compared to full-count scans, showed a slight reduction in performance. Nonetheless, discrepancies across different scatter window configurations and between count levels were minimal, with all normalized mean square error (NMSE) values remaining within 2.1% when comparing the different DL attenuation maps to the reference CT maps. For attenuation corrected SPECT slices using DL estimated maps, NMSE values were within 0.5% when compared to CT correction.<i>Significance.</i>This study, leveraging an extensive clinical dataset, showed that the performance of DL seemed to be consistent across the use of varied scatter window settings. Moreover, our investigation into reduced count studies indicated that DL could provide accurate AC even at a ¼-count level.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8b09","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Deep learning (DL) is becoming increasingly important in generating attenuation maps for accurate attenuation correction (AC) in cardiac perfusion SPECT imaging. Typically, DL models take inputs from initial reconstructed SPECT images, which are performed on the photopeak window and often also on scatter windows. While prior studies have demonstrated improvements in DL performance when scatter window images are incorporated into the DL input, the comprehensive analysis of the impact of employing different scatter windows remains unassessed. Additionally, existing research mainly focuses on applying DL to SPECT scans obtained at clinical standard count levels. This study aimed to assess utilities of DL from two aspects: (1) investigating the impact when different scatter windows were used as input to DL, and (2) evaluating the performance of DL when applied on SPECT scans acquired at a reduced count level.Approach.We utilized 1517 subjects, with 386 subjects for testing and the remaining 1131 for training and validation.Main results.The results showed that as scatter window width increased from 4% to 30%, a slight improvement was observed in DL estimated attenuation maps. The application of DL models to quarter-count (¼-count) SPECT scans, compared to full-count scans, showed a slight reduction in performance. Nonetheless, discrepancies across different scatter window configurations and between count levels were minimal, with all normalized mean square error (NMSE) values remaining within 2.1% when comparing the different DL attenuation maps to the reference CT maps. For attenuation corrected SPECT slices using DL estimated maps, NMSE values were within 0.5% when compared to CT correction.Significance.This study, leveraging an extensive clinical dataset, showed that the performance of DL seemed to be consistent across the use of varied scatter window settings. Moreover, our investigation into reduced count studies indicated that DL could provide accurate AC even at a ¼-count level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究基于深度学习的心脏 SPECT/CT 成像衰减图估算的散射能量窗口宽度和计数水平。
目的:深度学习(DL)在生成衰减图以对心脏灌注 SPECT 成像进行精确衰减校正方面正变得越来越重要。通常情况下,深度学习模型的输入来自初始重建的 SPECT 图像,这些图像是在光峰窗上执行的,通常也在散射窗上执行。虽然之前的研究表明,将散射窗图像纳入 DL 输入时,DL 性能会有所改善,但对采用不同散射窗的影响的全面分析仍有待评估。此外,现有研究主要侧重于将 DL 应用于以临床标准计数水平获得的 SPECT 扫描。本研究旨在从两个方面评估 DL 的实用性:1)调查不同散射窗作为 DL 输入时的影响;2)评估 DL 应用于以较低计数水平获取的 SPECT 扫描时的性能:主要结果:结果显示,随着散射窗宽度从 4% 增加到 30%,DL 估算的衰减图略有改善。与全计数扫描相比,将 DL 模型应用于四分之一计数(¼-计数)SPECT 扫描的性能略有下降。不过,不同散射窗配置和不同计数水平之间的差异很小,将不同的DL衰减图与参考CT图进行比较时,所有归一化均方误差(NMSE)值都保持在2.1%以内。对于使用 DL 估算图进行衰减校正的 SPECT 切片,与 CT 校正相比,归一化均方误差值在 0.5%以内:本研究利用广泛的临床数据集显示,在使用不同的散射窗设置时,DL 的性能似乎是一致的。此外,我们对减少计数研究的调查表明,即使是在¼计数水平,DL也能提供准确的衰减校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
期刊最新文献
Automated planning of curved needle channels in 3D printed patient-tailored applicators for cervical cancer brachytherapy. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging (CEUS) and super-resolution ultrasound (SRU) for the quantification of ischaemia flow redistribution: a theoretical study. Novel frequency selective B1focusing passive Lenz resonators for substantial MRI signal-to-noise ratio amplification. On the microdosimetric characterisation of the radiation quality of a carbon-ion beam and the effect of the target volume thickness. Automated treatment planning with deep reinforcement learning for head-and-neck (HN) cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1