Low-value interventions to deimplement: A secondary analysis of a systematic review of low back pain clinical practice guidelines.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13270
Daniel Tai, Eunyeop Kim, Prateek Grover, Alejandro Rodriguez, Timothy J Olivier, Thiru M Annaswamy
{"title":"Low-value interventions to deimplement: A secondary analysis of a systematic review of low back pain clinical practice guidelines.","authors":"Daniel Tai, Eunyeop Kim, Prateek Grover, Alejandro Rodriguez, Timothy J Olivier, Thiru M Annaswamy","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a secondary review of low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) identified in a recently conducted systematic review and to synthesize and summarize low-value recommendations as practices that may be candidates for deimplementation.</p><p><strong>Literature survey: </strong>LBP (subacute or chronic) CPGs in English (symptom based, created by a governmental or professional society, published between January 1990 and May 2020) were previously identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Ortho Guidelines, CPG Infobase, Emergency Care Research Institute, Guidelines International Network, National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, and Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Twenty-one CPGs were reviewed from a systematic review (previously published). Full-text review of all 21 CPGs was conducted, and three recommendation categories indicative of low value (recommend strongly against, recommend weakly against, inconclusive/insufficient evidence) were identified using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) language and approach.</p><p><strong>Synthesis: </strong>One hundred thirty-five low-value recommendations were identified and classified under eight intervention categories: orthotics/support, traction, physical modalities, pharmacological interventions, injections, surgery, bed rest, and miscellaneous. Traction, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic ultrasound (TUS), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) had the most CPGs recommend strongly against their usage. Opioids were recommended strongly against by four CPGs. No significant difference (p > .05) was found between CPG quality and a specific deimplementation recommendation or between CPG quality and the number of strongly against, weakly against, and inconclusive/insufficient evidence recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians managing patients with chronic LBP should consider deimplementing these low-value interventions (traction, TENS, TUS, and SSRI).</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To perform a secondary review of low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG) identified in a recently conducted systematic review and to synthesize and summarize low-value recommendations as practices that may be candidates for deimplementation.

Literature survey: LBP (subacute or chronic) CPGs in English (symptom based, created by a governmental or professional society, published between January 1990 and May 2020) were previously identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Ortho Guidelines, CPG Infobase, Emergency Care Research Institute, Guidelines International Network, National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, and Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network.

Methodology: Twenty-one CPGs were reviewed from a systematic review (previously published). Full-text review of all 21 CPGs was conducted, and three recommendation categories indicative of low value (recommend strongly against, recommend weakly against, inconclusive/insufficient evidence) were identified using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) language and approach.

Synthesis: One hundred thirty-five low-value recommendations were identified and classified under eight intervention categories: orthotics/support, traction, physical modalities, pharmacological interventions, injections, surgery, bed rest, and miscellaneous. Traction, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic ultrasound (TUS), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) had the most CPGs recommend strongly against their usage. Opioids were recommended strongly against by four CPGs. No significant difference (p > .05) was found between CPG quality and a specific deimplementation recommendation or between CPG quality and the number of strongly against, weakly against, and inconclusive/insufficient evidence recommendations.

Conclusions: Clinicians managing patients with chronic LBP should consider deimplementing these low-value interventions (traction, TENS, TUS, and SSRI).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
取消低价值干预措施:对腰背痛临床实践指南系统回顾的二次分析。
目的对最近进行的一项系统综述中确定的腰背痛(LBP)临床实践指南(CPG)进行二次综述,并对低价值建议进行归纳和总结,将其作为可能被取消实施的做法:文献调查:使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Ortho Guidelines、CPG Infobase、急救护理研究所、国际指南网络、国家健康与护理卓越研究所和苏格兰校际指南网络,对英文版枸杞多糖症(亚急性或慢性)CPG(基于症状、由政府或专业协会制定、1990 年 1 月至 2020 年 5 月间出版)进行了识别:从系统综述(先前已发表)中审查了 21 份 CPG。对所有 21 份 CPG 进行了全文审阅,并使用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)语言和方法确定了三个表明低价值的建议类别(强烈建议反对、建议弱反对、不确定/证据不足):确定了 135 项低价值建议,并将其归入八个干预类别:矫形器/支撑、牵引、物理模式、药物干预、注射、手术、卧床休息和其他。强烈反对使用牵引、经皮神经电刺激(TENS)、治疗性超声波(TUS)和选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)的 CPG 最多。有四项 CPG 强烈反对使用阿片类药物。在 CPG 质量与具体的不执行建议之间,或 CPG 质量与强烈反对、弱反对和不确定/证据不足建议的数量之间,均未发现明显差异(p > .05):结论:管理慢性腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床医生应考虑停止实施这些低价值干预措施(牵引、TENS、TUS 和 SSRI)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release utilizing a modified 20-gauge spinal needle. Self-perceived preparedness for practice among graduating physical medicine & rehabilitation residents. Knee joint mechanics during gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a partial or full thickness quadriceps tendon autograft at 2 years after surgery. Test Smart, Treat Smart-using clinician feedback to adapt a catheter-associated urinary tract infection intervention for spinal cord injury. Racial disparities in prosthesis use, satisfaction, and physical function in upper limb amputation and the impact of veteran status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1