[Compensation for National Socialist Persecution as a Catalyst for a Paradigm Shift - A Contribution to the History of Psychiatry in the Early Federal Republic of Germany].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1055/a-2407-7941
Peter Theiss-Abendroth
{"title":"[Compensation for National Socialist Persecution as a Catalyst for a Paradigm Shift - A Contribution to the History of Psychiatry in the Early Federal Republic of Germany].","authors":"Peter Theiss-Abendroth","doi":"10.1055/a-2407-7941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After WW II, Holocaust survivors often faced negative assessments by German psychiatrists when claiming compensation for psychological damage, a fact that was met with criticism. This study examines how as a result the prevailing doctrine on trauma sequelae underwent a transformation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Academic contributions in German language from 1946 to 1969 are analyzed for their para-digmatic views on the etiology of mental disorders after war and Nazi persecution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only a new generation of psychiatrists was able to develop more adequate psychotraumatological concepts by using anthropological and occasionally psychoanalytic theoretical elements. At the same time this also questioned the medically oriented concept of illness in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Less the persistence of anti-Semitic sentiments but rather internal scientific reasons such as an unevidenced dogmatism obstructed the the advancement of science.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2407-7941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: After WW II, Holocaust survivors often faced negative assessments by German psychiatrists when claiming compensation for psychological damage, a fact that was met with criticism. This study examines how as a result the prevailing doctrine on trauma sequelae underwent a transformation.

Methods: Academic contributions in German language from 1946 to 1969 are analyzed for their para-digmatic views on the etiology of mental disorders after war and Nazi persecution.

Results: Only a new generation of psychiatrists was able to develop more adequate psychotraumatological concepts by using anthropological and occasionally psychoanalytic theoretical elements. At the same time this also questioned the medically oriented concept of illness in psychiatry.

Conclusion: Less the persistence of anti-Semitic sentiments but rather internal scientific reasons such as an unevidenced dogmatism obstructed the the advancement of science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[对国家社会主义迫害的赔偿是范式转变的催化剂--对德意志联邦共和国早期精神病学史的贡献]。
目的:二战结束后,大屠杀幸存者在申请心理损害赔偿时经常会面临德国精神科医生的负面评估,这一事实遭到了批评。本研究探讨了有关创伤后遗症的主流理论是如何因此而发生转变的:方法:分析 1946 年至 1969 年德语学术著作中关于战争和纳粹迫害后精神障碍病因的准理论观点:结果:只有新一代精神病学家能够通过使用人类学理论元素,偶尔也使用精神分析理论元素,发展出更为适当的精神创伤学概念。同时,这也对精神病学中以医学为导向的疾病概念提出了质疑:结论:与其说是反犹情绪的持续存在,不如说是科学内部的原因,如未经证实的教条主义阻碍了科学的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
期刊最新文献
[Institutionalised Pre-School Childcare and Reported Maltreatment: A Survey in East Germany]. [What does an Ideal Day Centre Look Like? The User Perspective on Day-Structuring Programmes for People with Mental Illness]. [Compensation for National Socialist Persecution as a Catalyst for a Paradigm Shift - A Contribution to the History of Psychiatry in the Early Federal Republic of Germany]. [IEHT vs. Regular Treatment - Are there Differences between the Two forms of Treatment in the Retrospective Course with regard to Individual Objective and Subjective Outcome Variables?] [Occupational Stressors and Resources of Peer Workers in Social Psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1