A Comparative Analysis of Neurocognitive Function in Community- and Hospital-Based Patients With Schizophrenia.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry Investigation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI:10.30773/pi.2024.0077
Seri Maeng, Hee Seon Kim, Tae Joo Lee, Hoon Jung Koo, Won-Hyoung Kim
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Neurocognitive Function in Community- and Hospital-Based Patients With Schizophrenia.","authors":"Seri Maeng, Hee Seon Kim, Tae Joo Lee, Hoon Jung Koo, Won-Hyoung Kim","doi":"10.30773/pi.2024.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study compared differences in various neurocognitive characteristics across treatment modalities among schizophrenia patients recruited in one city between July 2020 and June 2023 who were on regular medication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 151 participants, 113 were included in the analysis. Participants were divided into community-based and hospital-based groups, and their demographics and clinical characteristics, including insight, quality of life, positive and negative symptoms, and personal and social functioning, were examined. In addition, several aspects of cognition were assessed using neurocognitive assessments such as the Trail Making Test (TMT), Stroop test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). After adjusting for age differences between groups, the final analysis included data from 42 participants in the community-based group and 33 participants in the hospital-based group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital-based group participants completed Stroop-W more rapidly, excelled in Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test recall and recognition, and incurred fewer TMT Part B (TMT-B) and Stroop-C errors. Additionally, they outperformed in WCST total, non-persistent errors, and categories completed. Contrastingly, community-based group participants showed superior outcomes in WCST persistent responses and errors, suggesting specific neurocognitive strengths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found differences in neurocognitive characteristics between the two groups. These differences were consistent across a range of cognitive domains, including attention, visual discrimination, memory, and executive functioning. Further large-scale study is needed to generalize cognitive characteristics across treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21164,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Investigation","volume":"21 10","pages":"1110-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2024.0077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study compared differences in various neurocognitive characteristics across treatment modalities among schizophrenia patients recruited in one city between July 2020 and June 2023 who were on regular medication.

Methods: Of the 151 participants, 113 were included in the analysis. Participants were divided into community-based and hospital-based groups, and their demographics and clinical characteristics, including insight, quality of life, positive and negative symptoms, and personal and social functioning, were examined. In addition, several aspects of cognition were assessed using neurocognitive assessments such as the Trail Making Test (TMT), Stroop test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). After adjusting for age differences between groups, the final analysis included data from 42 participants in the community-based group and 33 participants in the hospital-based group.

Results: Hospital-based group participants completed Stroop-W more rapidly, excelled in Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test recall and recognition, and incurred fewer TMT Part B (TMT-B) and Stroop-C errors. Additionally, they outperformed in WCST total, non-persistent errors, and categories completed. Contrastingly, community-based group participants showed superior outcomes in WCST persistent responses and errors, suggesting specific neurocognitive strengths.

Conclusion: We found differences in neurocognitive characteristics between the two groups. These differences were consistent across a range of cognitive domains, including attention, visual discrimination, memory, and executive functioning. Further large-scale study is needed to generalize cognitive characteristics across treatment modalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区和医院精神分裂症患者神经认知功能的比较分析。
研究目的该研究比较了 2020 年 7 月至 2023 年 6 月期间在某市招募的接受常规药物治疗的精神分裂症患者在不同治疗方式下的各种神经认知特征的差异:在 151 名参与者中,113 人被纳入分析。参与者被分为社区组和医院组,研究了他们的人口统计学特征和临床特征,包括洞察力、生活质量、阳性和阴性症状以及个人和社会功能。此外,还使用神经认知评估方法(如追踪测试(TMT)、斯特罗普测试和威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST))对认知的几个方面进行了评估。在对组间年龄差异进行调整后,最终分析包括了社区组 42 名参与者和医院组 33 名参与者的数据:结果:医院组的参与者完成 Stroop-W 测试的速度更快,在 Rey-Osterrieth 复杂图形测试的回忆和识别能力方面表现出色,出现 TMT B 部分(TMT-B)和 Stroop-C 错误的人数更少。此外,他们在 WCST 总分、非持续性错误和完成类别方面的表现也更出色。与此相反,社区小组参与者在 WCST 持续反应和错误方面表现优异,这表明他们具有特定的神经认知优势:结论:我们发现两组参与者的神经认知特征存在差异。结论:我们发现了两组人在神经认知特征方面的差异,这些差异在一系列认知领域都是一致的,包括注意力、视觉辨别力、记忆力和执行功能。我们需要进一步开展大规模研究,以归纳不同治疗模式下的认知特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Psychiatry Investigation is published on the 25th day of every month in English by the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA). The Journal covers the whole range of psychiatry and neuroscience. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and management of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms, as well as researches related to cross cultural psychiatry and ethnic issues in psychiatry. The Journal publishes editorials, review articles, original articles, brief reports, viewpoints and correspondences. All research articles are peer reviewed. Contributions are accepted for publication on the condition that their substance has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors submitting papers to the Journal (serially or otherwise) with a common theme or using data derived from the same sample (or a subset thereof) must send details of all relevant previous publications and simultaneous submissions. The Journal is not responsible for statements made by contributors. Material in the Journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or of the KNPA. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited to improve readability and to ensure conformity with house style.
期刊最新文献
Forbearance Coping, Community Resilience, Family Resilience and Mental Health During the Post-Pandemic in China: A Moderated Mediation Model. Development and Validation of the COVID-19 Infection Fear Scale in a Collectivist Cultural Context: A Study From South Korea. Effect of the Interaction Between Depression and Sleep Disorders on Stroke Occurrence: A 17-Year Prospective Cohort Study in Korea. Is the Current Lights-Off Time in General Hospitals Too Early, Given People's Usual Bedtimes? Abdominal Obesity Increases the Risk for Depression by Sex: A Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1